BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46156High confidence

LoongArch: Fix potential ADE in loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

16 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.88-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-7.0Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32783

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: Fix potential ADE in loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang() The switch case in loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang() may not DC2 or DC3, and readl(crtc_reg) will access with random address, because the "device" is from "base+PCI_DEVICE_ID", "base" is from "pdev->devfn+1". This is wrong when my platform inserts a discrete GPU: lspci -tv -[0000:00]-+-00.0 Loongson Technology LLC Hyper Transport Bridge Controller ... +-06.0 Loongson Technology LLC LG100 GPU +-06.2 Loongson Technology LLC Device 7a37 ... Add a default switch case to fix the panic as below: Kernel ade access[#1]: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.6.136-loong64-desktop-hwe+ #4 pc 90000000017e5534 ra 90000000017e54c0 tp 90000001002f8000 sp 90000001002fb6c0 a0 80000efe00003100 a1 0000000000003100 a2 0000000000000000 a3 0000000000000002 a4 90000001002fb6b4 a5 900000087cdb58fd a6 90000000027af000 a7 0000000000000001 t0 00000000000085b9 t1 000000000000ffff t2 0000000000000000 t3 0000000000000000 t4 fffffffffffffffd t5 00000000fffb6d9c t6 0000000000083b00 t7 00000000000070c0 t8 900000087cdb4d94 u0 900000087cdb58fd s9 90000001002fb826 s0 90000000031c12c8 s1 7fffffffffffff00 s2 90000000031c12d0 s3 0000000000002710 s4 0000000000000000 s5 0000000000000000 s6 9000000100053000 s7 7fffffffffffff00 s8 90000000030d4000 ra: 90000000017e54c0 loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0x40/0x210 ERA: 90000000017e5534 loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0xb4/0x210 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00480000 [ADEM] (IS= ECode=8 EsubCode=1) BADV: 7fffffffffffff00 PRID: 0014d000 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A6000-HV) Modules linked in: Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=(____ptrval____), task=(____ptrval____)) Stack : 0000000000000006 90000001002fb778 90000001002fb704 0000000000000007 0000000016a65700 90000000017e5690 000000000000ffff ffffffffffffffff 900000000209f7c0 9000000100053000 900000000209f7a8 9000000000eebc08 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000006 90000001002fb778 90000001000530b8 90000000027af000 0000000000000000 9000000100054000 9000000100053000 9000000000ebb70c 9000000100004c00 9000000004000001 90000001002fb7e4 bae765461f31cb12 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000006 90000000027af000 0000000000000030 90000000027af000 900000087cd6f800 9000000100053000 0000000000000000 9000000000ebc560 7a2500147cdaf720 bae765461f31cb12 0000000000000001 0000000000000030 ... Call Trace: [<90000000017e5534>] loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0xb4/0x210 [<9000000000eebc08>] pci_fixup_device+0x108/0x280 [<9000000000ebb70c>] pci_setup_device+0x24c/0x690 [<9000000000ebc560>] pci_scan_single_device+0xe0/0x140 [<9000000000ebc684>] pci_scan_slot+0xc4/0x280 [<9000000000ebdd00>] pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x60/0x3f0 [<9000000000f5bc94>] acpi_pci_root_create+0x2b4/0x420 [<90000000017e5e74>] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x2d4/0x440 [<9000000000f5b02c>] acpi_pci_root_add+0x21c/0x3a0 [<9000000000f4ee54>] acpi_bus_attach+0x1a4/0x3c0 [<90000000010e200c>] device_for_each_child+0x6c/0xe0 [<9000000000f4bbf4>] acpi_dev_for_each_child+0x44/0x70 [<9000000000f4ef40>] acpi_bus_attach+0x290/0x3c0 [<90000000010e200c>] device_for_each_child+0x6c/0xe0 [<9000000000f4bbf4>] acpi_dev_for_each_child+0x44/0x70 [<9000000000f4ef40>] acpi_bus_attach+0x290/0x3c0 [<9000000000f5211c>] acpi_bus_scan+0x6c/0x280 [<900000000189c028>] acpi_scan_init+0x194/0x310 [<900000000189bc6c>] acpi_init+0xcc/0x140 [<9000000000220cdc>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x310 [<90000000018618fc>] kernel_init_freeable+0x258/0x2d4 [<900000000184326c>] kernel_init+0x28/0x13c [<9000000000222008>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: Fix potential ADE in loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang() The switch case in loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang() may not DC2 or DC3, and readl(crtc_reg) will access with random address, because the "device" is from "base+PCI_DEVICE_ID", "base" is from "pdev->devfn+1". This is wrong when my platform inserts a discrete GPU: lspci -tv -[0000:00]-+-00.0 Loongson Technology LLC Hyper Transport Bridge Controller ... +-06.0 Loongson Technology LLC LG100 GPU +-06.2 Loongson Technology LLC Device 7a37 ... Add a default switch case to fix the panic as below: Kernel ade access[#1]: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.6.136-loong64-desktop-hwe+ #4 pc 90000000017e5534 ra 90000000017e54c0 tp 90000001002f8000 sp 90000001002fb6c0 a0 80000efe00003100 a1 0000000000003100 a2 0000000000000000 a3 0000000000000002 a4 90000001002fb6b4 a5 900000087cdb58fd a6 90000000027af000 a7 0000000000000001 t0 00000000000085b9 t1 000000000000ffff t2 0000000000000000 t3 0000000000000000 t4 fffffffffffffffd t5 00000000fffb6d9c t6 0000000000083b00 t7 00000000000070c0 t8 900000087cdb4d94 u0 900000087cdb58fd s9 90000001002fb826 s0 90000000031c12c8 s1 7fffffffffffff00 s2 90000000031c12d0 s3 0000000000002710 s4 0000000000000000 s5 0000000000000000 s6 9000000100053000 s7 7fffffffffffff00 s8 90000000030d4000 ra: 90000000017e54c0 loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0x40/0x210 ERA: 90000000017e5534 loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0xb4/0x210 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00480000 [ADEM] (IS= ECode=8 EsubCode=1) BADV: 7fffffffffffff00 PRID: 0014d000 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A6000-HV) Modules linked in: Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=(____ptrval____), task=(____ptrval____)) Stack : 0000000000000006 90000001002fb778 90000001002fb704 0000000000000007 0000000016a65700 90000000017e5690 000000000000ffff ffffffffffffffff 900000000209f7c0 9000000100053000 900000000209f7a8 9000000000eebc08 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000006 90000001002fb778 90000001000530b8 90000000027af000 0000000000000000 9000000100054000 9000000100053000 9000000000ebb70c 9000000100004c00 9000000004000001 90000001002fb7e4 bae765461f31cb12 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000006 90000000027af000 0000000000000030 90000000027af000 900000087cd6f800 9000000100053000 0000000000000000 9000000000ebc560 7a2500147cdaf720 bae765461f31cb12 0000000000000001 0000000000000030 ... Call Trace: [<90000000017e5534>] loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0xb4/0x210 [<9000000000eebc08>] pci_fixup_device+0x108/0x280 [<9000000000ebb70c>] pci_setup_device+0x24c/0x690 [<9000000000ebc560>] pci_scan_single_device+0xe0/0x140 [<9000000000ebc684>] pci_scan_slot+0xc4/0x280 [<9000000000ebdd00>] pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x60/0x3f0 [<9000000000f5bc94>] acpi_pci_root_create+0x2b4/0x420 [<90000000017e5e74>] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x2d4/0x440 [<9000000000f5b02c>] acpi_pci_root_add+0x21c/0x3a0 [<9000000000f4ee54>] acpi_bus_attach+0x1a4/0x3c0 [<90000000010e200c>] device_for_each_child+0x6c/0xe0 [<9000000000f4bbf4>] acpi_dev_for_each_child+0x44/0x70 [<9000000000f4ef40>] acpi_bus_attach+0x290/0x3c0 [<90000000010e200c>] device_for_each_child+0x6c/0xe0 [<9000000000f4bbf4>] acpi_dev_for_each_child+0x44/0x70 [<9000000000f4ef40>] acpi_bus_attach+0x290/0x3c0 [<9000000000f5211c>] acpi_bus_scan+0x6c/0x280 [<900000000189c028>] acpi_scan_init+0x194/0x310 [<900000000189bc6c>] acpi_init+0xcc/0x140 [<9000000000220cdc>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x310 [<90000000018618fc>] kernel_init_freeable+0x258/0x2d4 [<900000000184326c>] kernel_init+0x28/0x13c [<9000000000222008>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: Fix potential ADE in loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang() The switch case in loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang() may not DC2 or DC3, and readl(crtc_reg) will access with random address, because the "device" is from "base+PCI_DEVICE_ID", "base" is from "pdev->devfn+1". This is wrong when my platform inserts a discrete GPU: lspci -tv -[0000:00]-+-00.0 Loongson Technology LLC Hyper Transport Bridge Controller ... +-06.0 Loongson Technology LLC LG100 GPU +-06.2 Loongson Technology LLC Device 7a37 ... Add a default switch case to fix the panic as below: Kernel ade access[#1]: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.6.136-loong64-desktop-hwe+ #4 pc 90000000017e5534 ra 90000000017e54c0 tp 90000001002f8000 sp 90000001002fb6c0 a0 80000efe00003100 a1 0000000000003100 a2 0000000000000000 a3 0000000000000002 a4 90000001002fb6b4 a5 900000087cdb58fd a6 90000000027af000 a7 0000000000000001 t0 00000000000085b9 t1 000000000000ffff t2 0000000000000000 t3 0000000000000000 t4 fffffffffffffffd t5 00000000fffb6d9c t6 0000000000083b00 t7 00000000000070c0 t8 900000087cdb4d94 u0 900000087cdb58fd s9 90000001002fb826 s0 90000000031c12c8 s1 7fffffffffffff00 s2 90000000031c12d0 s3 0000000000002710 s4 0000000000000000 s5 0000000000000000 s6 9000000100053000 s7 7fffffffffffff00 s8 90000000030d4000 ra: 90000000017e54c0 loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0x40/0x210 ERA: 90000000017e5534 loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0xb4/0x210 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00480000 [ADEM] (IS= ECode=8 EsubCode=1) BADV: 7fffffffffffff00 PRID: 0014d000 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A6000-HV) Modules linked in: Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=(____ptrval____), task=(____ptrval____)) Stack : 0000000000000006 90000001002fb778 90000001002fb704 0000000000000007 0000000016a65700 90000000017e5690 000000000000ffff ffffffffffffffff 900000000209f7c0 9000000100053000 900000000209f7a8 9000000000eebc08 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000006 90000001002fb778 90000001000530b8 90000000027af000 0000000000000000 9000000100054000 9000000100053000 9000000000ebb70c 9000000100004c00 9000000004000001 90000001002fb7e4 bae765461f31cb12 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000006 90000000027af000 0000000000000030 90000000027af000 900000087cd6f800 9000000100053000 0000000000000000 9000000000ebc560 7a2500147cdaf720 bae765461f31cb12 0000000000000001 0000000000000030 ... Call Trace: [<90000000017e5534>] loongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang+0xb4/0x210 [<9000000000eebc08>] pci_fixup_device+0x108/0x280 [<9000000000ebb70c>] pci_setup_device+0x24c/0x690 [<9000000000ebc560>] pci_scan_single_device+0xe0/0x140 [<9000000000ebc684>] pci_scan_slot+0xc4/0x280 [<9000000000ebdd00>] pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x60/0x3f0 [<9000000000f5bc94>] acpi_pci_root_create+0x2b4/0x420 [<90000000017e5e74>] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x2d4/0x440 [<9000000000f5b02c>] acpi_pci_root_add+0x21c/0x3a0 [<9000000000f4ee54>] acpi_bus_attach+0x1a4/0x3c0 [<90000000010e200c>] device_for_each_child+0x6c/0xe0 [<9000000000f4bbf4>] acpi_dev_for_each_child+0x44/0x70 [<9000000000f4ef40>] acpi_bus_attach+0x290/0x3c0 [<90000000010e200c>] device_for_each_child+0x6c/0xe0 [<9000000000f4bbf4>] acpi_dev_for_each_child+0x44/0x70 [<9000000000f4ef40>] acpi_bus_attach+0x290/0x3c0 [<9000000000f5211c>] acpi_bus_scan+0x6c/0x280 [<900000000189c028>] acpi_scan_init+0x194/0x310 [<900000000189bc6c>] acpi_init+0xcc/0x140 [<9000000000220cdc>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x310 [<90000000018618fc>] kernel_init_freeable+0x258/0x2d4 [<900000000184326c>] kernel_init+0x28/0x13c [<9000000000222008>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46153 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46153 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46153 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46153 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46153 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46153 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0731Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46138 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46142 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46144 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46145 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46146 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46149 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46150 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46151 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46152 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46155 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46156 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46159 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46160 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46161 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46163 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46164 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46165 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46167 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46168 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46172 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46173 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Mic

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-018994LinuxのLinux Kernelにおけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルのloongson_gpu_fixup_dma_hang()関数内での潜在的な不正メモリアクセスによる問題が修正されました。この脆弱性は、離散GPUを使用する環境で誤ったメモリアドレスにアクセスし、カーネルパニックを引き起こす可能性があります。この修正は、defaultのswitchケースを追加して不正なアクセスを防止し、システムの安定性を向上させました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: a31da4d5d1fc29d92d2410c60e1ca298b02a6528 < bfde8accc3e3260c0ecbb8cc34361739e1e16f31, f458dceaa6a35f89180ebd14484983d8e79ecd10 < 07d190e4ec689d6478f7f5e36099fb9bf457e7c5, 151ba1721ac50765e16d293256389ef14553b46e < 2cb19b06c09983727573bbe7d7430cbad480a714, 70fb63c5d36cc02eaf336b87ac6a82e657f832a4 < 9e1aed63a5552958ef2a9bfd699a3f990e52a77f, 95db0c9f526d583634cddb2e5914718570fbac87 < 81fef1c278436e6bd68ee4ca05a0acb96e256561, 95db0c9f526d583634cddb2e5914718570fbac87 < 8dfa2f8780e486d05b9a0ffce70b8f5fbd62053e, 3446dd359ba9a6ce5a1ca389c0d48c434d3cc915, 6.1.168 < 6.1.175, 6.6.131 < 6.6.140, 6.12.80 < 6.12.88, 6.18.21 < 6.18.30, 6.19.11 < 6.20, 7.0
Fixed
Linux: < 7.0, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 17:58 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32783
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46156 · cve.blacktree.nl