BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46116High confidence

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 15 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.88-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
CVE-2026-46116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 34 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-46116
164 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains. __xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates: if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi); while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev. The defensive change here: - Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst, bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc(). - Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields. Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash. Reproduction: - Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV - syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db - 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal - 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state lifecycle
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2026-46116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete
22 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-rt as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-kvm as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-internal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-partner as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's `xfrm` (IPSec framework) subsystem. This vulnerability, a use-after-free, occurs when the system incorrectly manages memory related to security policies, specifically during the deletion of `xfrm_state` lists. An attacker with local access could exploit this flaw by triggering specific operations, leading to memory corruption. This could cause the system to become unstable, resulting in crashes or a Denial of Service (DoS), and potentially allow for unauthorized access to sensitive information or increased privileges.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains. __xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates: if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi); while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev. The defensive change here: - Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst, bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc(). - Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields. Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash. Reproduction: - Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV - syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db - 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal - 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state lifecycle
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32875

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains. __xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates: if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi); while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev. The defensive change here: - Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst, bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc(). - Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields. Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash. Reproduction: - Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV - syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db - 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal - 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state lifecycle

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains. __xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates: if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi); while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev. The defensive change here: - Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst, bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc(). - Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields. Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash. Reproduction: - Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV - syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db - 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal - 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state lifecycle

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains. __xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates: if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi); while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev. The defensive change here: - Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst, bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc(). - Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields. Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash. Reproduction: - Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV - syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db - 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal - 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state lifecycle

Why

The product attempts to return a memory resource to the system, but it calls the wrong release function or calls the appropriate release function incorrectly.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains. __xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates: if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi); while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev. The defensive change here: - Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst, bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc(). - Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields. Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash. Reproduction: - Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV - syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db - 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal - 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state lifecycle

Why

The product attempts to return a memory resource to the system, but it calls the wrong release function or calls the appropriate release function incorrectly.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-763 ↗

CWE-763: Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference. The product attempts to return a memory resource to the system, but it calls the wrong release function or calls the appropriate release function incorrectly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-763
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32875Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains. __xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates: if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi); while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev. The defensive change here: - Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst, bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc(). - Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields. Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash. Reproduction: - Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV - syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db - 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal - 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state lifecycle

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3623IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, erweiterte Berechtigungen zu erlangen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen oder Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3043IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen und um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45897 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45968 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46127 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46195 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52920 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-45505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45736 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45740 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45822 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0983Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-23199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23415 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31692 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-63807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63807 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-64531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0982Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31610 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31755 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0955Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-31488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31684 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52976 Référence CVE CVE-2026-52993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0928Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-43158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46181 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46131 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0899Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43330 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46173 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46316 Référence CVE CVE-2026-53016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46127 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0863Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-43329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46173 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46181 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46181 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0782Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46169 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46181 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0731Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46106 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46107 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46108 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46109 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46110 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46111 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46112 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46113 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46114 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46115 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46116 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46119 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46120 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46122 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46123 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46124 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46125 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46127 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46128 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46129 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46131 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Mic

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.19, 5.10.261 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 May 2026 · Last source change 15 Sept 2026, 12:04 UTC · CWE-763 · Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32875
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceOther authority
NVD statusNVD enrichment underway

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_283-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_293-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_296-default; and 175 more
    After
    kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_283-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_293-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_296-default; and 134 more
    SUSE Product Security Team ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_275-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_280-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_283-default; and 178 more
    After
    kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_283-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_293-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_296-default; and 175 more
    SUSE Product Security Team ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.0; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2; and 100 more
    After
    kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_275-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_280-default; SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12 SP5:kgraft-patch-4_12_14-122_283-default; and 178 more
    SUSE Product Security Team ↗
  4. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 6b4dc3181b4bfc5f5fc33ab33b1dc6e15759f4b6; 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 3943fcad7694a7d0b15aeabe7d3cc2a2eb8e92e8; 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 2c617848ae6e4f07a3e397f604208c293bbecacc; 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < b4a53add2fa8f1b5aa17d4c5686c320785fab182; 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 26edb0a3c99f9d958c212be68b21f1221614dcf0; 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 4980162de555cb838f1a189ce7d2cbf5d2e7b050; 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < a2e2d08fb070fab4947447171f1c4e3ca5a188e5; 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 14acf9652e5690de3c7486c6db5fb8dafd0a32a3 · Fixed: < 2.6.19; 5.10.261 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*
    After
    Linux: 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 6b4dc3181b4bfc5f5fc33ab33b1dc6e15759f4b6, 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 3943fcad7694a7d0b15aeabe7d3cc2a2eb8e92e8, 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 2c617848ae6e4f07a3e397f604208c293bbecacc, 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < b4a53add2fa8f1b5aa17d4c5686c320785fab182, 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 26edb0a3c99f9d958c212be68b21f1221614dcf0, 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 4980162de555cb838f1a189ce7d2cbf5d2e7b050, 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < a2e2d08fb070fab4947447171f1c4e3ca5a188e5, 7b4dc3600e4877178ba94c7fbf7e520421378aa6 < 14acf9652e5690de3c7486c6db5fb8dafd0a32a3, 2.6.19 · Fixed: Linux: < 2.6.19, 5.10.261 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
  5. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2026:59142; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2026:59143; 5 further removals.
    Before
    patch: git.kernel.org/14acf9652e5690de3c7486c6db5fb8dafd0a32a3 · patch: git.kernel.org/26edb0a3c99f9d958c212be68b21f1221614dcf0 · patch: git.kernel.org/2c617848ae6e4f07a3e397f604208c293bbecacc · 12 more references
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/14acf9652e5690de3c7486c6db5fb8dafd0a32a3 · patch: git.kernel.org/26edb0a3c99f9d958c212be68b21f1221614dcf0 · patch: git.kernel.org/2c617848ae6e4f07a3e397f604208c293bbecacc · 5 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
  6. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2026:59142; added vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2026:59143; 5 further additions.
    Before
    patch: git.kernel.org/14acf9652e5690de3c7486c6db5fb8dafd0a32a3 · patch: git.kernel.org/26edb0a3c99f9d958c212be68b21f1221614dcf0 · patch: git.kernel.org/2c617848ae6e4f07a3e397f604208c293bbecacc · 5 more references
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/14acf9652e5690de3c7486c6db5fb8dafd0a32a3 · patch: git.kernel.org/26edb0a3c99f9d958c212be68b21f1221614dcf0 · patch: git.kernel.org/2c617848ae6e4f07a3e397f604208c293bbecacc · 12 more references
    git.kernel.org ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46116 · cve.blacktree.nl