BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46110High confidence

net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32869

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted The CPU receives frames from the MAC through conventional DMA: the CPU allocates buffers for the MAC, then the MAC fills them and returns ownership to the CPU. For each hardware RX queue, the CPU and MAC coordinate through a shared ring array of DMA descriptors: one descriptor per DMA buffer. Each descriptor includes the buffer's physical address and a status flag ("OWN") indicating which side owns the buffer: OWN=0 for CPU, OWN=1 for MAC. The CPU is only allowed to set the flag and the MAC is only allowed to clear it, and both must move through the ring in sequence: thus the ring is used for both "submissions" and "completions." In the stmmac driver, stmmac_rx() bookmarks its position in the ring with the `cur_rx` index. The main receive loop in that function checks for rx_descs[cur_rx].own=0, gives the corresponding buffer to the network stack (NULLing the pointer), and increments `cur_rx` modulo the ring size. After the loop exits, stmmac_rx_refill(), which bookmarks its position with `dirty_rx`, allocates fresh buffers and rearms the descriptors (setting OWN=1). If it fails any allocation, it simply stops early (leaving OWN=0) and will retry where it left off when next called. This means descriptors have a three-stage lifecycle (terms my own): - `empty` (OWN=1, buffer valid) - `full` (OWN=0, buffer valid and populated) - `dirty` (OWN=0, buffer NULL) But because stmmac_rx() only checks OWN, it confuses `full`/`dirty`. In the past (see 'Fixes:'), there was a bug where the loop could cycle `cur_rx` all the way back to the first descriptor it dirtied, resulting in a NULL dereference when mistaken for `full`. The aforementioned commit resolved that *specific* failure by capping the loop's iteration limit at `dma_rx_size - 1`, but this is only a partial fix: if the previous stmmac_rx_refill() didn't complete, then there are leftover `dirty` descriptors that the loop might encounter without needing to cycle fully around. The current code therefore panics (see 'Closes:') when stmmac_rx_refill() is memory-starved long enough for `cur_rx` to catch up to `dirty_rx`. Fix this by explicitly checking, before advancing `cur_rx`, if the next entry is dirty; exit the loop if so. This prevents processing of the final, used descriptor until stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, but fully prevents the `cur_rx == dirty_rx` ambiguity as the previous bugfix intended: so remove the clamp as well. Since stmmac_rx_zc() is a copy-paste-and-tweak of stmmac_rx() and the code structure is identical, any fix to stmmac_rx() will also need a corresponding fix for stmmac_rx_zc(). Therefore, apply the same check there. In stmmac_rx() (not stmmac_rx_zc()), a related bug remains: after the MAC sets OWN=0 on the final descriptor, it will be unable to send any further DMA-complete IRQs until it's given more `empty` descriptors. Currently, the driver simply *hopes* that the next stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, risking an indefinite stall of the receive process if not. But this is not a regression, so it can be addressed in a future change.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted The CPU receives frames from the MAC through conventional DMA: the CPU allocates buffers for the MAC, then the MAC fills them and returns ownership to the CPU. For each hardware RX queue, the CPU and MAC coordinate through a shared ring array of DMA descriptors: one descriptor per DMA buffer. Each descriptor includes the buffer's physical address and a status flag ("OWN") indicating which side owns the buffer: OWN=0 for CPU, OWN=1 for MAC. The CPU is only allowed to set the flag and the MAC is only allowed to clear it, and both must move through the ring in sequence: thus the ring is used for both "submissions" and "completions." In the stmmac driver, stmmac_rx() bookmarks its position in the ring with the `cur_rx` index. The main receive loop in that function checks for rx_descs[cur_rx].own=0, gives the corresponding buffer to the network stack (NULLing the pointer), and increments `cur_rx` modulo the ring size. After the loop exits, stmmac_rx_refill(), which bookmarks its position with `dirty_rx`, allocates fresh buffers and rearms the descriptors (setting OWN=1). If it fails any allocation, it simply stops early (leaving OWN=0) and will retry where it left off when next called. This means descriptors have a three-stage lifecycle (terms my own): - `empty` (OWN=1, buffer valid) - `full` (OWN=0, buffer valid and populated) - `dirty` (OWN=0, buffer NULL) But because stmmac_rx() only checks OWN, it confuses `full`/`dirty`. In the past (see 'Fixes:'), there was a bug where the loop could cycle `cur_rx` all the way back to the first descriptor it dirtied, resulting in a NULL dereference when mistaken for `full`. The aforementioned commit resolved that *specific* failure by capping the loop's iteration limit at `dma_rx_size - 1`, but this is only a partial fix: if the previous stmmac_rx_refill() didn't complete, then there are leftover `dirty` descriptors that the loop might encounter without needing to cycle fully around. The current code therefore panics (see 'Closes:') when stmmac_rx_refill() is memory-starved long enough for `cur_rx` to catch up to `dirty_rx`. Fix this by explicitly checking, before advancing `cur_rx`, if the next entry is dirty; exit the loop if so. This prevents processing of the final, used descriptor until stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, but fully prevents the `cur_rx == dirty_rx` ambiguity as the previous bugfix intended: so remove the clamp as well. Since stmmac_rx_zc() is a copy-paste-and-tweak of stmmac_rx() and the code structure is identical, any fix to stmmac_rx() will also need a corresponding fix for stmmac_rx_zc(). Therefore, apply the same check there. In stmmac_rx() (not stmmac_rx_zc()), a related bug remains: after the MAC sets OWN=0 on the final descriptor, it will be unable to send any further DMA-complete IRQs until it's given more `empty` descriptors. Currently, the driver simply *hopes* that the next stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, risking an indefinite stall of the receive process if not. But this is not a regression, so it can be addressed in a future change.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: Prevent NULL deref when RX memory exhausted The CPU receives frames from the MAC through conventional DMA: the CPU allocates buffers for the MAC, then the MAC fills them and returns ownership to the CPU. For each hardware RX queue, the CPU and MAC coordinate through a shared ring array of DMA descriptors: one descriptor per DMA buffer. Each descriptor includes the buffer's physical address and a status flag ("OWN") indicating which side owns the buffer: OWN=0 for CPU, OWN=1 for MAC. The CPU is only allowed to set the flag and the MAC is only allowed to clear it, and both must move through the ring in sequence: thus the ring is used for both "submissions" and "completions." In the stmmac driver, stmmac_rx() bookmarks its position in the ring with the `cur_rx` index. The main receive loop in that function checks for rx_descs[cur_rx].own=0, gives the corresponding buffer to the network stack (NULLing the pointer), and increments `cur_rx` modulo the ring size. After the loop exits, stmmac_rx_refill(), which bookmarks its position with `dirty_rx`, allocates fresh buffers and rearms the descriptors (setting OWN=1). If it fails any allocation, it simply stops early (leaving OWN=0) and will retry where it left off when next called. This means descriptors have a three-stage lifecycle (terms my own): - `empty` (OWN=1, buffer valid) - `full` (OWN=0, buffer valid and populated) - `dirty` (OWN=0, buffer NULL) But because stmmac_rx() only checks OWN, it confuses `full`/`dirty`. In the past (see 'Fixes:'), there was a bug where the loop could cycle `cur_rx` all the way back to the first descriptor it dirtied, resulting in a NULL dereference when mistaken for `full`. The aforementioned commit resolved that *specific* failure by capping the loop's iteration limit at `dma_rx_size - 1`, but this is only a partial fix: if the previous stmmac_rx_refill() didn't complete, then there are leftover `dirty` descriptors that the loop might encounter without needing to cycle fully around. The current code therefore panics (see 'Closes:') when stmmac_rx_refill() is memory-starved long enough for `cur_rx` to catch up to `dirty_rx`. Fix this by explicitly checking, before advancing `cur_rx`, if the next entry is dirty; exit the loop if so. This prevents processing of the final, used descriptor until stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, but fully prevents the `cur_rx == dirty_rx` ambiguity as the previous bugfix intended: so remove the clamp as well. Since stmmac_rx_zc() is a copy-paste-and-tweak of stmmac_rx() and the code structure is identical, any fix to stmmac_rx() will also need a corresponding fix for stmmac_rx_zc(). Therefore, apply the same check there. In stmmac_rx() (not stmmac_rx_zc()), a related bug remains: after the MAC sets OWN=0 on the final descriptor, it will be unable to send any further DMA-complete IRQs until it's given more `empty` descriptors. Currently, the driver simply *hopes* that the next stmmac_rx_refill() succeeds, risking an indefinite stall of the receive process if not. But this is not a regression, so it can be addressed in a future change.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0782Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45970 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46300 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46333 Gestion détaillée du document le 12 juin 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.f

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0731Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46098 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46099 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46101 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46102 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46103 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-42496 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46106 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46107 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46108 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46109 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46110 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46111 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46112 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46113 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46114 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46115 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46116 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46119 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46120 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46122 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46123 du 29 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Mic

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
7414a28de1b3b028714859078c00a874f9feff52 < fdeb95b1fc7de25c9362990efb9996a8d761055c; 779334e59850f863bf34665e0ff0b6faf126873b < e1c50b273298c7cd9b08b113e7a7598b531a02f5; b6cb4541853c7ee512111b0e7ddf3cb66c99c137 < 5c910f7708e3c507b037ca91ca5b09f8cfe71e65; b6cb4541853c7ee512111b0e7ddf3cb66c99c137 < 4af2e62cbcda575a174acd230c3f3a208135e16d; b6cb4541853c7ee512111b0e7ddf3cb66c99c137 < 950cb436165aad0f8f2cd49da3cd07677465bcde; b6cb4541853c7ee512111b0e7ddf3cb66c99c137 < 0bb05e6adfa99a2ea1fee1125cc0953409f83ed8; b435b4573240b5530830a1a60e005c6fcfd928a0; 6.1.64 < 6.1.176
Fixed
< 6.7; 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*; 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32869
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enrichment underway

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46110 · cve.blacktree.nl