BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46096High confidence

tpm2-sessions: Fix missing tpm_buf_destroy() in tpm2_read_public()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 12 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 12 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

15 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 12 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-46096 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 8 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-46096
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build
  • SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tpm2-sessions: Fix missing tpm_buf_destroy() in tpm2_read_public() tpm2_read_public() calls tpm_buf_init() but fails to call tpm_buf_destroy() on two exit paths, leaking a page allocation: 1. When name_size() returns an error (unrecognized hash algorithm), the function returns directly without destroying the buffer. 2. On the success path, the buffer is never destroyed before returning. All other error paths in the function correctly call tpm_buf_destroy() before returning. Fix both by adding the missing tpm_buf_destroy() calls.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32479

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 12 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tpm2-sessions: Fix missing tpm_buf_destroy() in tpm2_read_public() tpm2_read_public() calls tpm_buf_init() but fails to call tpm_buf_destroy() on two exit paths, leaking a page allocation: 1. When name_size() returns an error (unrecognized hash algorithm), the function returns directly without destroying the buffer. 2. On the success path, the buffer is never destroyed before returning. All other error paths in the function correctly call tpm_buf_destroy() before returning. Fix both by adding the missing tpm_buf_destroy() calls.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tpm2-sessions: Fix missing tpm_buf_destroy() in tpm2_read_public() tpm2_read_public() calls tpm_buf_init() but fails to call tpm_buf_destroy() on two exit paths, leaking a page allocation: 1. When name_size() returns an error (unrecognized hash algorithm), the function returns directly without destroying the buffer. 2. On the success path, the buffer is never destroyed before returning. All other error paths in the function correctly call tpm_buf_destroy() before returning. Fix both by adding the missing tpm_buf_destroy() calls.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tpm2-sessions: Fix missing tpm_buf_destroy() in tpm2_read_public() tpm2_read_public() calls tpm_buf_init() but fails to call tpm_buf_destroy() on two exit paths, leaking a page allocation: 1. When name_size() returns an error (unrecognized hash algorithm), the function returns directly without destroying the buffer. 2. On the success path, the buffer is never destroyed before returning. All other error paths in the function correctly call tpm_buf_destroy() before returning. Fix both by adding the missing tpm_buf_destroy() calls.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46087 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46087 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46087 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46087 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-021041LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。tpm2-sessionsのtpm2_read_public()関数内部で、tpm_buf_destroy()の呼び出し漏れがありました。tpm2_read_public()はtpm_buf_init()を呼び出しますが、2つの終了パスにおいてtpm_buf_destroy()が呼び出されず、ページ割り当てのリークが発生していました。具体的には、1. name_size()がエラー(未認識のハッシュアルゴリズム)を返した場合、関数はバッファを破壊せずに直接戻っていました。2. 成功パスでも、戻る前にバッファが破壊されていませんでした。その他のエラーパスでは、戻る前に正しくtpm_buf_destroy()が呼び出されていました。これらの問題を修正するために、欠落していたtpm_buf_destroy()の呼び出しを追加しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.19, 6.18.27 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.4 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 17:54 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32479
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46096 · cve.blacktree.nl