BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46079High confidence

rbd: fix null-ptr-deref when device_add_disk() fails

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.86-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-46079 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 21 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-46079
105 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rbd: fix null-ptr-deref when device_add_disk() fails do_rbd_add() publishes the device with device_add() before calling device_add_disk(). If device_add_disk() fails after device_add() succeeds, the error path calls rbd_free_disk() directly and then later falls through to rbd_dev_device_release(), which calls rbd_free_disk() again. This double teardown can leave blk-mq cleanup operating on invalid state and trigger a null-ptr-deref in __blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs(), reached from blk_mq_free_tag_set(). Fix this by following the normal remove ordering: call device_del() before rbd_dev_device_release() when device_add_disk() fails after device_add(). That keeps the teardown sequence consistent and avoids re-entering disk cleanup through the wrong path. The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly available. We reproduced the bug on v7.0 with a real Ceph backend and a QEMU x86_64 guest booted with KASAN and CONFIG_FAILSLAB enabled. The reproducer confines failslab injections to the __add_disk() range and injects fail-nth while mapping an RBD image through /sys/bus/rbd/add_single_major. On the unpatched kernel, fail-nth=4 reliably triggered the fault: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 273 Comm: bash Not tainted 7.0.0-01247-gd60bc1401583 #6 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs+0x8c/0x240 Code: 00 00 48 8b 6b 60 41 89 f4 49 c1 e4 03 4c 01 e5 45 85 ed 0f 85 0a 01 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 e9 48 c1 e9 03 3c 01 00 0f 85 31 01 00 00 4c 8b 6d 00 4d 85 ed 0f 84 e2 00 00 RSP: 0018:ff1100000ab0fac8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ff1100000c4806a0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff1100000c4806f4 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffe21c000189001b R10: ff1100000c4800df R11: ff1100006cf37be0 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ff1100000c480700 R15: ff1100000c480004 FS: 00007f0fbe8fe740(0000) GS:ff110000e5851000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe53473b2e0 CR3: 0000000012eef000 CR4: 00000000007516f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: blk_mq_free_tag_set+0x77/0x460 do_rbd_add+0x1446/0x2b80 ? __pfx_do_rbd_add+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0x18c/0x300 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? sysfs_file_kobj+0xb6/0x1b0 ? __pfx_sysfs_kf_write+0x10/0x10 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2f4/0x4a0 vfs_write+0x98e/0x1000 ? expand_files+0x51f/0x850 ? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0x10 ksys_write+0xf2/0x1d0 ? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x115/0x690 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f0fbea15907 Code: 10 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffe22346ea8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000058 RCX: 00007f0fbea15907 RDX: 0000000000000058 RSI: 0000563ace6c0ef0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000563ace6c0ef0 R08: 0000563ace6c0ef0 R09: 6b6435726d694141 R10: 5250337279762f78 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000058 R13: 00007f0fbeb1c780 R14: ff1100000c480700 R15: ff1100000c480004 With this fix applied, rerunning the reproducer over fail-nth=1..256 yields no KASAN reports. [ idryomov: rename err_out_device_del -> err_out_device ]
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32462

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rbd: fix null-ptr-deref when device_add_disk() fails do_rbd_add() publishes the device with device_add() before calling device_add_disk(). If device_add_disk() fails after device_add() succeeds, the error path calls rbd_free_disk() directly and then later falls through to rbd_dev_device_release(), which calls rbd_free_disk() again. This double teardown can leave blk-mq cleanup operating on invalid state and trigger a null-ptr-deref in __blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs(), reached from blk_mq_free_tag_set(). Fix this by following the normal remove ordering: call device_del() before rbd_dev_device_release() when device_add_disk() fails after device_add(). That keeps the teardown sequence consistent and avoids re-entering disk cleanup through the wrong path. The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly available. We reproduced the bug on v7.0 with a real Ceph backend and a QEMU x86_64 guest booted with KASAN and CONFIG_FAILSLAB enabled. The reproducer confines failslab injections to the __add_disk() range and injects fail-nth while mapping an RBD image through /sys/bus/rbd/add_single_major. On the unpatched kernel, fail-nth=4 reliably triggered the fault: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 273 Comm: bash Not tainted 7.0.0-01247-gd60bc1401583 #6 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs+0x8c/0x240 Code: 00 00 48 8b 6b 60 41 89 f4 49 c1 e4 03 4c 01 e5 45 85 ed 0f 85 0a 01 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 e9 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 01 00 0f 85 31 01 00 00 4c 8b 6d 00 4d 85 ed 0f 84 e2 00 00 RSP: 0018:ff1100000ab0fac8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ff1100000c4806a0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff1100000c4806f4 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffe21c000189001b R10: ff1100000c4800df R11: ff1100006cf37be0 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ff1100000c480700 R15: ff1100000c480004 FS: 00007f0fbe8fe740(0000) GS:ff110000e5851000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe53473b2e0 CR3: 0000000012eef000 CR4: 00000000007516f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> blk_mq_free_tag_set+0x77/0x460 do_rbd_add+0x1446/0x2b80 ? __pfx_do_rbd_add+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0x18c/0x300 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? sysfs_file_kobj+0xb6/0x1b0 ? __pfx_sysfs_kf_write+0x10/0x10 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2f4/0x4a0 vfs_write+0x98e/0x1000 ? expand_files+0x51f/0x850 ? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0x10 ksys_write+0xf2/0x1d0 ? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x115/0x690 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f0fbea15907 Code: 10 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffe22346ea8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000058 RCX: 00007f0fbea15907 RDX: 0000000000000058 RSI: 0000563ace6c0ef0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000563ace6c0ef0 R08: 0000563ace6c0ef0 R09: 6b6435726d694141 R10: 5250337279762f78 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000058 R13: 00007f0fbeb1c780 R14: ff1100000c480700 R15: ff1100000c480004 </TASK> With this fix applied, rerunning the reproducer over fail-nth=1..256 yields no KASAN reports. [ idryomov: rename err_out_device_del -> err_out_device ]

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rbd: fix null-ptr-deref when device_add_disk() fails do_rbd_add() publishes the device with device_add() before calling device_add_disk(). If device_add_disk() fails after device_add() succeeds, the error path calls rbd_free_disk() directly and then later falls through to rbd_dev_device_release(), which calls rbd_free_disk() again. This double teardown can leave blk-mq cleanup operating on invalid state and trigger a null-ptr-deref in __blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs(), reached from blk_mq_free_tag_set(). Fix this by following the normal remove ordering: call device_del() before rbd_dev_device_release() when device_add_disk() fails after device_add(). That keeps the teardown sequence consistent and avoids re-entering disk cleanup through the wrong path. The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly available. We reproduced the bug on v7.0 with a real Ceph backend and a QEMU x86_64 guest booted with KASAN and CONFIG_FAILSLAB enabled. The reproducer confines failslab injections to the __add_disk() range and injects fail-nth while mapping an RBD image through /sys/bus/rbd/add_single_major. On the unpatched kernel, fail-nth=4 reliably triggered the fault: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 273 Comm: bash Not tainted 7.0.0-01247-gd60bc1401583 #6 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs+0x8c/0x240 Code: 00 00 48 8b 6b 60 41 89 f4 49 c1 e4 03 4c 01 e5 45 85 ed 0f 85 0a 01 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 e9 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 01 00 0f 85 31 01 00 00 4c 8b 6d 00 4d 85 ed 0f 84 e2 00 00 RSP: 0018:ff1100000ab0fac8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ff1100000c4806a0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff1100000c4806f4 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffe21c000189001b R10: ff1100000c4800df R11: ff1100006cf37be0 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ff1100000c480700 R15: ff1100000c480004 FS: 00007f0fbe8fe740(0000) GS:ff110000e5851000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe53473b2e0 CR3: 0000000012eef000 CR4: 00000000007516f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> blk_mq_free_tag_set+0x77/0x460 do_rbd_add+0x1446/0x2b80 ? __pfx_do_rbd_add+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0x18c/0x300 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? sysfs_file_kobj+0xb6/0x1b0 ? __pfx_sysfs_kf_write+0x10/0x10 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2f4/0x4a0 vfs_write+0x98e/0x1000 ? expand_files+0x51f/0x850 ? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0x10 ksys_write+0xf2/0x1d0 ? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x115/0x690 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f0fbea15907 Code: 10 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffe22346ea8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000058 RCX: 00007f0fbea15907 RDX: 0000000000000058 RSI: 0000563ace6c0ef0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000563ace6c0ef0 R08: 0000563ace6c0ef0 R09: 6b6435726d694141 R10: 5250337279762f78 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000058 R13: 00007f0fbeb1c780 R14: ff1100000c480700 R15: ff1100000c480004 </TASK> With this fix applied, rerunning the reproducer over fail-nth=1..256 yields no KASAN reports. [ idryomov: rename err_out_device_del -> err_out_device ]

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rbd: fix null-ptr-deref when device_add_disk() fails do_rbd_add() publishes the device with device_add() before calling device_add_disk(). If device_add_disk() fails after device_add() succeeds, the error path calls rbd_free_disk() directly and then later falls through to rbd_dev_device_release(), which calls rbd_free_disk() again. This double teardown can leave blk-mq cleanup operating on invalid state and trigger a null-ptr-deref in __blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs(), reached from blk_mq_free_tag_set(). Fix this by following the normal remove ordering: call device_del() before rbd_dev_device_release() when device_add_disk() fails after device_add(). That keeps the teardown sequence consistent and avoids re-entering disk cleanup through the wrong path. The bug was first flagged by an experimental analysis tool we are developing for kernel memory-management bugs while analyzing v6.13-rc1. The tool is still under development and is not yet publicly available. We reproduced the bug on v7.0 with a real Ceph backend and a QEMU x86_64 guest booted with KASAN and CONFIG_FAILSLAB enabled. The reproducer confines failslab injections to the __add_disk() range and injects fail-nth while mapping an RBD image through /sys/bus/rbd/add_single_major. On the unpatched kernel, fail-nth=4 reliably triggered the fault: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 273 Comm: bash Not tainted 7.0.0-01247-gd60bc1401583 #6 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs+0x8c/0x240 Code: 00 00 48 8b 6b 60 41 89 f4 49 c1 e4 03 4c 01 e5 45 85 ed 0f 85 0a 01 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 e9 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 01 00 0f 85 31 01 00 00 4c 8b 6d 00 4d 85 ed 0f 84 e2 00 00 RSP: 0018:ff1100000ab0fac8 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ff1100000c4806a0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff1100000c4806f4 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffe21c000189001b R10: ff1100000c4800df R11: ff1100006cf37be0 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ff1100000c480700 R15: ff1100000c480004 FS: 00007f0fbe8fe740(0000) GS:ff110000e5851000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe53473b2e0 CR3: 0000000012eef000 CR4: 00000000007516f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> blk_mq_free_tag_set+0x77/0x460 do_rbd_add+0x1446/0x2b80 ? __pfx_do_rbd_add+0x10/0x10 ? lock_acquire+0x18c/0x300 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? sysfs_file_kobj+0xb6/0x1b0 ? __pfx_sysfs_kf_write+0x10/0x10 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2f4/0x4a0 vfs_write+0x98e/0x1000 ? expand_files+0x51f/0x850 ? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0x10 ksys_write+0xf2/0x1d0 ? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x115/0x690 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f0fbea15907 Code: 10 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffe22346ea8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000058 RCX: 00007f0fbea15907 RDX: 0000000000000058 RSI: 0000563ace6c0ef0 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 0000563ace6c0ef0 R08: 0000563ace6c0ef0 R09: 6b6435726d694141 R10: 5250337279762f78 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000058 R13: 00007f0fbeb1c780 R14: ff1100000c480700 R15: ff1100000c480004 </TASK> With this fix applied, rerunning the reproducer over fail-nth=1..256 yields no KASAN reports. [ idryomov: rename err_out_device_del -> err_out_device ]

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-46062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45974 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45983 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45932 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45970 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45983 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0782Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45932 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45970 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45983 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0731Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46063 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46064 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46065 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46068 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46069 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46070 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46072 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46075 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46077 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46078 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46079 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46080 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46082 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46083 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46084 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46085 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46086 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46088 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46089 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46091 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46094 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Mic

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.16, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.86 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.27 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.4 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 17:52 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32462
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enrichment underway

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46079 · cve.blacktree.nl