BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46063High confidence

x86/shstk: Prevent deadlock during shstk sigreturn

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32445

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/shstk: Prevent deadlock during shstk sigreturn During sigreturn the shadow stack signal frame is popped. The kernel does this by reading the shadow stack using normal read accesses. When it can't assume the memory is shadow stack, it takes extra steps to makes sure it is reading actual shadow stack memory and not other normal readable memory. It does this by holding the mmap read lock while doing the access and checking the flags of the VMA. Unfortunately that is not safe. If the read of the shadow stack sigframe hits a page fault, the fault handler will try to recursively grab another mmap read lock. This normally works ok, but if a writer on another CPU is also waiting, the second read lock could fail and cause a deadlock. Fix this by not holding mmap lock during the read access to userspace. Instead use mmap_lock_speculate_...() to watch for changes between dropping mmap lock and the userspace access. Retry if anything grabbed an mmap write lock in between and could have changed the VMA. These mmap_lock_speculate_...() helpers use mm::mm_lock_seq, which is only available when PER_VMA_LOCK is configured. So make X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK depend on it. On x86, PER_VMA_LOCK is a default configuration for SMP kernels. So drop support for the other configs under the assumption that the !SMP shadow stack user base does not exist. Currently there is a check that skips the lookup work when the SSP can be assumed to be on a shadow stack. While reorganizing the function, remove the optimization to make the tricky code flows more common, such that issues like this cannot escape detection for so long.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/shstk: Prevent deadlock during shstk sigreturn During sigreturn the shadow stack signal frame is popped. The kernel does this by reading the shadow stack using normal read accesses. When it can't assume the memory is shadow stack, it takes extra steps to makes sure it is reading actual shadow stack memory and not other normal readable memory. It does this by holding the mmap read lock while doing the access and checking the flags of the VMA. Unfortunately that is not safe. If the read of the shadow stack sigframe hits a page fault, the fault handler will try to recursively grab another mmap read lock. This normally works ok, but if a writer on another CPU is also waiting, the second read lock could fail and cause a deadlock. Fix this by not holding mmap lock during the read access to userspace. Instead use mmap_lock_speculate_...() to watch for changes between dropping mmap lock and the userspace access. Retry if anything grabbed an mmap write lock in between and could have changed the VMA. These mmap_lock_speculate_...() helpers use mm::mm_lock_seq, which is only available when PER_VMA_LOCK is configured. So make X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK depend on it. On x86, PER_VMA_LOCK is a default configuration for SMP kernels. So drop support for the other configs under the assumption that the !SMP shadow stack user base does not exist. Currently there is a check that skips the lookup work when the SSP can be assumed to be on a shadow stack. While reorganizing the function, remove the optimization to make the tricky code flows more common, such that issues like this cannot escape detection for so long.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/shstk: Prevent deadlock during shstk sigreturn During sigreturn the shadow stack signal frame is popped. The kernel does this by reading the shadow stack using normal read accesses. When it can't assume the memory is shadow stack, it takes extra steps to makes sure it is reading actual shadow stack memory and not other normal readable memory. It does this by holding the mmap read lock while doing the access and checking the flags of the VMA. Unfortunately that is not safe. If the read of the shadow stack sigframe hits a page fault, the fault handler will try to recursively grab another mmap read lock. This normally works ok, but if a writer on another CPU is also waiting, the second read lock could fail and cause a deadlock. Fix this by not holding mmap lock during the read access to userspace. Instead use mmap_lock_speculate_...() to watch for changes between dropping mmap lock and the userspace access. Retry if anything grabbed an mmap write lock in between and could have changed the VMA. These mmap_lock_speculate_...() helpers use mm::mm_lock_seq, which is only available when PER_VMA_LOCK is configured. So make X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK depend on it. On x86, PER_VMA_LOCK is a default configuration for SMP kernels. So drop support for the other configs under the assumption that the !SMP shadow stack user base does not exist. Currently there is a check that skips the lookup work when the SSP can be assumed to be on a shadow stack. While reorganizing the function, remove the optimization to make the tricky code flows more common, such that issues like this cannot escape detection for so long.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46067 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0731Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46047 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46048 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46049 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46050 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46051 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46052 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46053 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46056 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46058 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46062 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46063 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46064 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46065 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46068 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46069 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46070 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46072 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46075 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46077 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46078 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46079 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Mic

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
7fad2a432cd35bbf104d2d9d426e74902f22aa95 < e2c2b044458cbf22da05264fa707308e8d4f86f9; 7fad2a432cd35bbf104d2d9d426e74902f22aa95 < d042d69b417515959e49021fef008c9b04a99bd5; 7fad2a432cd35bbf104d2d9d426e74902f22aa95 < 4f3374c990fb2adec06d20fd6d780927811c9aa0; 7fad2a432cd35bbf104d2d9d426e74902f22aa95 < 3d29db827502067626062f5c74dd502d14ab15bc; 7fad2a432cd35bbf104d2d9d426e74902f22aa95 < 9874b2917b9fbc30956fee209d3c4aa47201c64e; 6.6
Fixed
< 6.6; 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.27 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.0.4 ≤ 7.0.*; 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 17:51 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32445
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46063 · cve.blacktree.nl