BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-46052High confidence

ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32434

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed Ceph can call d_add(dentry, NULL) on a negative dentry that is already present in the primary dcache hash. In the current VFS that is not safe. d_add() goes through __d_add() to __d_rehash(), which unconditionally reinserts dentry->d_hash into the hlist_bl bucket. If the dentry is already hashed, reinserting the same node can corrupt the bucket, including creating a self-loop. Once that happens, __d_lookup() can spin forever in the hlist_bl walk, typically looping only on the d_name.hash mismatch check and eventually triggering RCU stall reports like this one: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 87-....: (2100 ticks this GP) idle=3a4c/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=25003319/25003319 fqs=829 rcu: (t=2101 jiffies g=79058445 q=698988 ncpus=192) CPU: 87 UID: 2952868916 PID: 3933303 Comm: php-cgi8.3 Not tainted 6.18.17-i1-amd #950 NONE Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R7615/0G9DHV, BIOS 1.6.6 09/22/2023 RIP: 0010:__d_lookup+0x46/0xb0 Code: c1 e8 07 48 8d 04 c2 48 8b 00 49 89 fc 49 89 f5 48 89 c3 48 83 e3 fe 48 83 f8 01 77 0f eb 2d 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 1b 48 85 db <74> 20 39 6b 18 75 f3 48 8d 7b 78 e8 ba 85 d0 00 4c 39 63 10 74 1f RSP: 0018:ff745a70c8253898 EFLAGS: 00000282 RAX: ff26e470054cb208 RBX: ff26e470054cb208 RCX: 000000006e958966 RDX: ff26e48267340000 RSI: ff745a70c82539b0 RDI: ff26e458f74655c0 RBP: 000000006e958966 R08: 0000000000000180 R09: 9cd08d909b919a89 R10: ff26e458f74655c0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ff26e458f74655c0 R13: ff745a70c82539b0 R14: d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0 R15: 2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f FS: 00007f5770896980(0000) GS:ff26e482c5d88000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f5764de50c0 CR3: 000000a72abb5001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> lookup_fast+0x9f/0x100 walk_component+0x1f/0x150 link_path_walk+0x20e/0x3d0 path_lookupat+0x68/0x180 filename_lookup+0xdc/0x1e0 vfs_statx+0x6c/0x140 vfs_fstatat+0x67/0xa0 __do_sys_newfstatat+0x24/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x230 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e This is reachable with reused cached negative dentries. A Ceph lookup or atomic_open can be handed a negative dentry that is already hashed, and fs/ceph/dir.c then hits one of two paths that incorrectly assume "negative" also means "unhashed": - ceph_finish_lookup(): MDS reply is -ENOENT with no trace -> d_add(dentry, NULL) - ceph_lookup(): local ENOENT fast path for a complete directory with shared caps -> d_add(dentry, NULL) Both paths can therefore re-add an already-hashed negative dentry. Ceph already uses the correct pattern elsewhere: ceph_fill_trace() only calls d_add(dn, NULL) for a negative null-dentry reply when d_unhashed(dn) is true. Fix both fs/ceph/dir.c sites the same way: only call d_add() for a negative dentry when it is actually unhashed. If the negative dentry is already hashed, leave it in place and reuse it as-is. This preserves the existing behavior for unhashed dentries while avoiding d_hash list corruption for reused hashed negatives.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed Ceph can call d_add(dentry, NULL) on a negative dentry that is already present in the primary dcache hash. In the current VFS that is not safe. d_add() goes through __d_add() to __d_rehash(), which unconditionally reinserts dentry->d_hash into the hlist_bl bucket. If the dentry is already hashed, reinserting the same node can corrupt the bucket, including creating a self-loop. Once that happens, __d_lookup() can spin forever in the hlist_bl walk, typically looping only on the d_name.hash mismatch check and eventually triggering RCU stall reports like this one: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 87-....: (2100 ticks this GP) idle=3a4c/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=25003319/25003319 fqs=829 rcu: (t=2101 jiffies g=79058445 q=698988 ncpus=192) CPU: 87 UID: 2952868916 PID: 3933303 Comm: php-cgi8.3 Not tainted 6.18.17-i1-amd #950 NONE Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R7615/0G9DHV, BIOS 1.6.6 09/22/2023 RIP: 0010:__d_lookup+0x46/0xb0 Code: c1 e8 07 48 8d 04 c2 48 8b 00 49 89 fc 49 89 f5 48 89 c3 48 83 e3 fe 48 83 f8 01 77 0f eb 2d 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 1b 48 85 db <74> 20 39 6b 18 75 f3 48 8d 7b 78 e8 ba 85 d0 00 4c 39 63 10 74 1f RSP: 0018:ff745a70c8253898 EFLAGS: 00000282 RAX: ff26e470054cb208 RBX: ff26e470054cb208 RCX: 000000006e958966 RDX: ff26e48267340000 RSI: ff745a70c82539b0 RDI: ff26e458f74655c0 RBP: 000000006e958966 R08: 0000000000000180 R09: 9cd08d909b919a89 R10: ff26e458f74655c0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ff26e458f74655c0 R13: ff745a70c82539b0 R14: d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0 R15: 2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f FS: 00007f5770896980(0000) GS:ff26e482c5d88000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f5764de50c0 CR3: 000000a72abb5001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> lookup_fast+0x9f/0x100 walk_component+0x1f/0x150 link_path_walk+0x20e/0x3d0 path_lookupat+0x68/0x180 filename_lookup+0xdc/0x1e0 vfs_statx+0x6c/0x140 vfs_fstatat+0x67/0xa0 __do_sys_newfstatat+0x24/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x230 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e This is reachable with reused cached negative dentries. A Ceph lookup or atomic_open can be handed a negative dentry that is already hashed, and fs/ceph/dir.c then hits one of two paths that incorrectly assume "negative" also means "unhashed": - ceph_finish_lookup(): MDS reply is -ENOENT with no trace -> d_add(dentry, NULL) - ceph_lookup(): local ENOENT fast path for a complete directory with shared caps -> d_add(dentry, NULL) Both paths can therefore re-add an already-hashed negative dentry. Ceph already uses the correct pattern elsewhere: ceph_fill_trace() only calls d_add(dn, NULL) for a negative null-dentry reply when d_unhashed(dn) is true. Fix both fs/ceph/dir.c sites the same way: only call d_add() for a negative dentry when it is actually unhashed. If the negative dentry is already hashed, leave it in place and reuse it as-is. This preserves the existing behavior for unhashed dentries while avoiding d_hash list corruption for reused hashed negatives.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: only d_add() negative dentries when they are unhashed Ceph can call d_add(dentry, NULL) on a negative dentry that is already present in the primary dcache hash. In the current VFS that is not safe. d_add() goes through __d_add() to __d_rehash(), which unconditionally reinserts dentry->d_hash into the hlist_bl bucket. If the dentry is already hashed, reinserting the same node can corrupt the bucket, including creating a self-loop. Once that happens, __d_lookup() can spin forever in the hlist_bl walk, typically looping only on the d_name.hash mismatch check and eventually triggering RCU stall reports like this one: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: 87-....: (2100 ticks this GP) idle=3a4c/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=25003319/25003319 fqs=829 rcu: (t=2101 jiffies g=79058445 q=698988 ncpus=192) CPU: 87 UID: 2952868916 PID: 3933303 Comm: php-cgi8.3 Not tainted 6.18.17-i1-amd #950 NONE Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R7615/0G9DHV, BIOS 1.6.6 09/22/2023 RIP: 0010:__d_lookup+0x46/0xb0 Code: c1 e8 07 48 8d 04 c2 48 8b 00 49 89 fc 49 89 f5 48 89 c3 48 83 e3 fe 48 83 f8 01 77 0f eb 2d 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 1b 48 85 db <74> 20 39 6b 18 75 f3 48 8d 7b 78 e8 ba 85 d0 00 4c 39 63 10 74 1f RSP: 0018:ff745a70c8253898 EFLAGS: 00000282 RAX: ff26e470054cb208 RBX: ff26e470054cb208 RCX: 000000006e958966 RDX: ff26e48267340000 RSI: ff745a70c82539b0 RDI: ff26e458f74655c0 RBP: 000000006e958966 R08: 0000000000000180 R09: 9cd08d909b919a89 R10: ff26e458f74655c0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ff26e458f74655c0 R13: ff745a70c82539b0 R14: d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0 R15: 2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f FS: 00007f5770896980(0000) GS:ff26e482c5d88000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f5764de50c0 CR3: 000000a72abb5001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> lookup_fast+0x9f/0x100 walk_component+0x1f/0x150 link_path_walk+0x20e/0x3d0 path_lookupat+0x68/0x180 filename_lookup+0xdc/0x1e0 vfs_statx+0x6c/0x140 vfs_fstatat+0x67/0xa0 __do_sys_newfstatat+0x24/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x230 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e This is reachable with reused cached negative dentries. A Ceph lookup or atomic_open can be handed a negative dentry that is already hashed, and fs/ceph/dir.c then hits one of two paths that incorrectly assume "negative" also means "unhashed": - ceph_finish_lookup(): MDS reply is -ENOENT with no trace -> d_add(dentry, NULL) - ceph_lookup(): local ENOENT fast path for a complete directory with shared caps -> d_add(dentry, NULL) Both paths can therefore re-add an already-hashed negative dentry. Ceph already uses the correct pattern elsewhere: ceph_fill_trace() only calls d_add(dn, NULL) for a negative null-dentry reply when d_unhashed(dn) is true. Fix both fs/ceph/dir.c sites the same way: only call d_add() for a negative dentry when it is actually unhashed. If the negative dentry is already hashed, leave it in place and reuse it as-is. This preserves the existing behavior for unhashed dentries while avoiding d_hash list corruption for reused hashed negatives.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1029Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-46027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-46038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-46043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0731Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46037 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46038 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46040 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46043 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46046 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46047 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46048 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46049 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46050 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46051 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46052 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46053 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46056 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46058 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46062 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46063 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46064 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46065 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46068 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46069 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46070 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Mic

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
2817b000b02c5f0c05af67c01fb2684e1381d6ef < 4147ae08824cc8b65d2b2018f79d416af2937108; 2817b000b02c5f0c05af67c01fb2684e1381d6ef < 73b47a1f06dee5e61b00dee5227d75d3f1f6d977; 2817b000b02c5f0c05af67c01fb2684e1381d6ef < 79ffcbeac6bc1dc1bcdb0434acf250f6215ec111; 2817b000b02c5f0c05af67c01fb2684e1381d6ef < 83ce43a21bb7df8dd52228afdd918d2d058eefde; 2817b000b02c5f0c05af67c01fb2684e1381d6ef < 4179cc390dacebc87079419ec92f86f3dc46294d; 2817b000b02c5f0c05af67c01fb2684e1381d6ef < b91e535f208c48a5e7464f1aa38338a30e7912df; 2817b000b02c5f0c05af67c01fb2684e1381d6ef < 2010cb06b9df7d3c816c78358c566bdacbdf38ff; 2817b000b02c5f0c05af67c01fb2684e1381d6ef < 803447f93d75ab6e40c85e6d12b5630d281d70d6
Fixed
< 2.6.34; 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.86 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.27 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.0.4 ≤ 7.0.*
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32434
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-46052 · cve.blacktree.nl