BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-45990High confidence

slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

15 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 11 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32286

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc() Commit 2cd8231796b5 ("mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc") introduced the ability to force a reallocation if the original object does not satisfy new alignment or NUMA node, even when the object is being shrunk. This introduced two bugs in the reallocation fallback path: 1. Data loss during NUMA migration: The jump to 'alloc_new' happens before 'ks' and 'orig_size' are initialized. As a result, the memcpy() in the 'alloc_new' block would copy 0 bytes into the new allocation. 2. Buffer overflow during shrinking: When shrinking an object while forcing a new alignment, 'new_size' is smaller than the old size. However, the memcpy() used the old size ('orig_size ?: ks'), leading to an out-of-bounds write. The same overflow bug exists in the kvrealloc() fallback path, where the old bucket size ksize(p) is copied into the new buffer without being bounded by the new size. A simple reproducer: // e.g. add to lkdtm as KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW while (1) { void *p = kmalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL); p = krealloc_node_align(p, 64, 256, GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE); kfree(p); } demonstrates the issue: ================================================================== BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds write in memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130 Out-of-bounds write at 0xffff8883ad757038 (120B right of kfence-#47): memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130 krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x1c8/0x340 lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm] lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm] ... kfence-#47: 0xffff8883ad756fc0-0xffff8883ad756fff, size=64, cache=kmalloc-64 allocated by task 316 on cpu 7 at 97.680481s (0.021813s ago): krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x19c/0x340 lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm] lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm] ... ================================================================== Fix it by moving the old size calculation to the top of __do_krealloc() and bounding all copy lengths by the new allocation size.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc() Commit 2cd8231796b5 ("mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc") introduced the ability to force a reallocation if the original object does not satisfy new alignment or NUMA node, even when the object is being shrunk. This introduced two bugs in the reallocation fallback path: 1. Data loss during NUMA migration: The jump to 'alloc_new' happens before 'ks' and 'orig_size' are initialized. As a result, the memcpy() in the 'alloc_new' block would copy 0 bytes into the new allocation. 2. Buffer overflow during shrinking: When shrinking an object while forcing a new alignment, 'new_size' is smaller than the old size. However, the memcpy() used the old size ('orig_size ?: ks'), leading to an out-of-bounds write. The same overflow bug exists in the kvrealloc() fallback path, where the old bucket size ksize(p) is copied into the new buffer without being bounded by the new size. A simple reproducer: // e.g. add to lkdtm as KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW while (1) { void *p = kmalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL); p = krealloc_node_align(p, 64, 256, GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE); kfree(p); } demonstrates the issue: ================================================================== BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds write in memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130 Out-of-bounds write at 0xffff8883ad757038 (120B right of kfence-#47): memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130 krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x1c8/0x340 lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm] lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm] ... kfence-#47: 0xffff8883ad756fc0-0xffff8883ad756fff, size=64, cache=kmalloc-64 allocated by task 316 on cpu 7 at 97.680481s (0.021813s ago): krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x19c/0x340 lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm] lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm] ... ================================================================== Fix it by moving the old size calculation to the top of __do_krealloc() and bounding all copy lengths by the new allocation size.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slub: fix data loss and overflow in krealloc() Commit 2cd8231796b5 ("mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc") introduced the ability to force a reallocation if the original object does not satisfy new alignment or NUMA node, even when the object is being shrunk. This introduced two bugs in the reallocation fallback path: 1. Data loss during NUMA migration: The jump to 'alloc_new' happens before 'ks' and 'orig_size' are initialized. As a result, the memcpy() in the 'alloc_new' block would copy 0 bytes into the new allocation. 2. Buffer overflow during shrinking: When shrinking an object while forcing a new alignment, 'new_size' is smaller than the old size. However, the memcpy() used the old size ('orig_size ?: ks'), leading to an out-of-bounds write. The same overflow bug exists in the kvrealloc() fallback path, where the old bucket size ksize(p) is copied into the new buffer without being bounded by the new size. A simple reproducer: // e.g. add to lkdtm as KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW while (1) { void *p = kmalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL); p = krealloc_node_align(p, 64, 256, GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE); kfree(p); } demonstrates the issue: ================================================================== BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds write in memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130 Out-of-bounds write at 0xffff8883ad757038 (120B right of kfence-#47): memcpy_orig+0x68/0x130 krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x1c8/0x340 lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm] lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm] ... kfence-#47: 0xffff8883ad756fc0-0xffff8883ad756fff, size=64, cache=kmalloc-64 allocated by task 316 on cpu 7 at 97.680481s (0.021813s ago): krealloc_node_align_noprof+0x19c/0x340 lkdtm_KREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOW+0x8c/0xc0 [lkdtm] lkdtm_do_action+0x3a/0x60 [lkdtm] ... ================================================================== Fix it by moving the old size calculation to the top of __do_krealloc() and bounding all copy lengths by the new allocation size.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45983 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45995 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45974 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45983 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45995 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45998 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45983 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45995 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45983 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45995 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45998 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-020099LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、次の脆弱性が修正されました。slubのkrealloc()におけるデータ損失およびオーバーフローの問題です。コミット2cd8231796b5("mm/slub: allow to set node and align in k[v]realloc")により、オブジェクトが縮小される場合でも、新しいアライメントやNUMAノードの条件を満たさない場合に再割り当てを強制できる機能が追加されました。しかし、これにより再割り当てのフォールバックパスで2つのバグが発生しました。1つ目はNUMA移行時のデータ損失で、alloc_newへのジャンプがksおよびorig_sizeの初期化前に行われるため、alloc_newブロック内のmemcpy()が新しい割り当てに0バイトをコピーしてしまいます。2つ目は縮小時のバッファオーバーフローで、強制的に新しいアライメントを設定してオブジェクトを縮小する際、新しいサイズ(new_size)は旧サイズより小さいにもかかわらず、memcpy()が旧サイズ(orig_size ?: ks)を使用するため境界外書き込みが発生します。同様のオーバーフローバグはkvrealloc()のフォールバックパスにも存在し、新しいサイズで制限されずに旧バケットサイズksize(p)が新しいバッファにコピーされてしまいます。問題の簡単な再現例はlkdtmにKREALLOC_SHRINK_OVERFLOWとして追加されており、以下のように示されています。while (1) {void *p = kmalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL); p = krealloc_node_align(p, 64, 256, GFP_KERNEL, NUMA_NO_NODE); kfree(p);}これにより、memcpy_origで120バイトの境界外書き込みが発生し、KFENCEがこれを検出します。修正は__do_krealloc()の冒頭で旧サイズの計算を移動し、すべてのコピー長を新しい割り当てサイズで制限することにより実施されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 2cd8231796b5e7133b1c3d66ad7d2a3c42c97258 < 38387ccc0fbe38d14fb4c2ad7ee1d7404e5e59fd, 2cd8231796b5e7133b1c3d66ad7d2a3c42c97258 < 550fa6b5aabb096554536ac1e3ec96b76cbb35fd, 2cd8231796b5e7133b1c3d66ad7d2a3c42c97258 < 082a6d03a2d685a83a332666b500ad3966349588, 6.18
Fixed
Linux: < 6.18, 6.18.27 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.4 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 17:46 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32286
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-45990 · cve.blacktree.nl