BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-45919High confidence

sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32385

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu() CPU0 becomes overloaded when hosting a CPU-bound RT task, a non-CPU-bound RT task, and a CFS task stuck in kernel space. When other CPUs switch from RT to non-RT tasks, RT load balancing (LB) is triggered; with HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled, they send IPIs to CPU0 to drive the execution of rto_push_irq_work_func. During push_rt_task on CPU0, if next_task->prio < rq->donor->prio, resched_curr() sets NEED_RESCHED and after the push operation completes, CPU0 calls rto_next_cpu(). Since only CPU0 is overloaded in this scenario, rto_next_cpu() should ideally return -1 (no further IPI needed). However, multiple CPUs invoking tell_cpu_to_push() during LB increments rd->rto_loop_next. Even when rd->rto_cpu is set to -1, the mismatch between rd->rto_loop and rd->rto_loop_next forces rto_next_cpu() to restart its search from -1. With CPU0 remaining overloaded (satisfying rt_nr_migratory && rt_nr_total > 1), it gets reselected, causing CPU0 to queue irq_work to itself and send self-IPIs repeatedly. As long as CPU0 stays overloaded and other CPUs run pull_rt_tasks(), it falls into an infinite self-IPI loop, which triggers a CPU hardlockup due to continuous self-interrupts. The trigging scenario is as follows: cpu0 cpu1 cpu2 pull_rt_task tell_cpu_to_push <------------irq_work_queue_on rto_push_irq_work_func push_rt_task resched_curr(rq) pull_rt_task rto_next_cpu tell_cpu_to_push <-------------------------- atomic_inc(rto_loop_next) rd->rto_loop != next rto_next_cpu irq_work_queue_on rto_push_irq_work_func Fix redundant self-IPI by filtering the initiating CPU in rto_next_cpu(). This solution has been verified to effectively eliminate spurious self-IPIs and prevent CPU hardlockup scenarios.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu() CPU0 becomes overloaded when hosting a CPU-bound RT task, a non-CPU-bound RT task, and a CFS task stuck in kernel space. When other CPUs switch from RT to non-RT tasks, RT load balancing (LB) is triggered; with HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled, they send IPIs to CPU0 to drive the execution of rto_push_irq_work_func. During push_rt_task on CPU0, if next_task->prio < rq->donor->prio, resched_curr() sets NEED_RESCHED and after the push operation completes, CPU0 calls rto_next_cpu(). Since only CPU0 is overloaded in this scenario, rto_next_cpu() should ideally return -1 (no further IPI needed). However, multiple CPUs invoking tell_cpu_to_push() during LB increments rd->rto_loop_next. Even when rd->rto_cpu is set to -1, the mismatch between rd->rto_loop and rd->rto_loop_next forces rto_next_cpu() to restart its search from -1. With CPU0 remaining overloaded (satisfying rt_nr_migratory && rt_nr_total > 1), it gets reselected, causing CPU0 to queue irq_work to itself and send self-IPIs repeatedly. As long as CPU0 stays overloaded and other CPUs run pull_rt_tasks(), it falls into an infinite self-IPI loop, which triggers a CPU hardlockup due to continuous self-interrupts. The trigging scenario is as follows: cpu0 cpu1 cpu2 pull_rt_task tell_cpu_to_push <------------irq_work_queue_on rto_push_irq_work_func push_rt_task resched_curr(rq) pull_rt_task rto_next_cpu tell_cpu_to_push <-------------------------- atomic_inc(rto_loop_next) rd->rto_loop != next rto_next_cpu irq_work_queue_on rto_push_irq_work_func Fix redundant self-IPI by filtering the initiating CPU in rto_next_cpu(). This solution has been verified to effectively eliminate spurious self-IPIs and prevent CPU hardlockup scenarios.

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu() CPU0 becomes overloaded when hosting a CPU-bound RT task, a non-CPU-bound RT task, and a CFS task stuck in kernel space. When other CPUs switch from RT to non-RT tasks, RT load balancing (LB) is triggered; with HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI enabled, they send IPIs to CPU0 to drive the execution of rto_push_irq_work_func. During push_rt_task on CPU0, if next_task->prio < rq->donor->prio, resched_curr() sets NEED_RESCHED and after the push operation completes, CPU0 calls rto_next_cpu(). Since only CPU0 is overloaded in this scenario, rto_next_cpu() should ideally return -1 (no further IPI needed). However, multiple CPUs invoking tell_cpu_to_push() during LB increments rd->rto_loop_next. Even when rd->rto_cpu is set to -1, the mismatch between rd->rto_loop and rd->rto_loop_next forces rto_next_cpu() to restart its search from -1. With CPU0 remaining overloaded (satisfying rt_nr_migratory && rt_nr_total > 1), it gets reselected, causing CPU0 to queue irq_work to itself and send self-IPIs repeatedly. As long as CPU0 stays overloaded and other CPUs run pull_rt_tasks(), it falls into an infinite self-IPI loop, which triggers a CPU hardlockup due to continuous self-interrupts. The trigging scenario is as follows: cpu0 cpu1 cpu2 pull_rt_task tell_cpu_to_push <------------irq_work_queue_on rto_push_irq_work_func push_rt_task resched_curr(rq) pull_rt_task rto_next_cpu tell_cpu_to_push <-------------------------- atomic_inc(rto_loop_next) rd->rto_loop != next rto_next_cpu irq_work_queue_on rto_push_irq_work_func Fix redundant self-IPI by filtering the initiating CPU in rto_next_cpu(). This solution has been verified to effectively eliminate spurious self-IPIs and prevent CPU hardlockup scenarios.

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-835

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop'). The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-835
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45890 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45924 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45946 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45890 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45924 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45946 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45921 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45924 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45928 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45894 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45901 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45921 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45922 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45928 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45933 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45898 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45924 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45942 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45943 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45921 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45928 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45938 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45921 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45928 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45935 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45938 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-45883 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45885 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45890 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45919 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45936 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45941 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45954 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45956 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 < d57d0746276a88ea43a2cc62b849fd8a95e32e41, 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 < 3b3c672a66db3de3b40f8a7057864bc1f874ede3, 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 < 16ca9f3117e9a294646c897daf08a5ab546c711b, 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 < 8ad5577b2d4acfd83f03d97a0aece2d18aac5f07, 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 < a6a73403733e86748421f2eeaf028c85683ef896, 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 < 52aeb1e07ec223caf212f036817976c98d2aa250, 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 < 9f25edc5a20cb52a5abbf25f0724bb4732b81801, 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 < 94894c9c477e53bcea052e075c53f89df3d2a33e, cb1831a83e54cd3269a2420fce81c4fd8ae6f667, 1c37ff78298a6b6063649123356a312e1cce12ca, f17c786b28a3060a566a170c2cf3bd7441fc30a3, 4.4.103 < 4.5, 4.9.66 < 4.10, 4.14.3 < 4.15, 4.15
Fixed
Linux: < 4.15, 5.10.252 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.202 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.165 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.128 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.75 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.14 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.4 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 May 2026 · Last source change 27 May 2026, 12:17 UTC · CWE-835 · Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32385
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enrichment underway

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-45919 · cve.blacktree.nl