BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-45905High confidence

xfrm: fix ip_rt_bug race in icmp_route_lookup reverse path

Linux · Linux

4.7MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32371

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: fix ip_rt_bug race in icmp_route_lookup reverse path icmp_route_lookup() performs multiple route lookups to find a suitable route for sending ICMP error messages, with special handling for XFRM (IPsec) policies. The lookup sequence is: 1. First, lookup output route for ICMP reply (dst = original src) 2. Pass through xfrm_lookup() for policy check 3. If blocked (-EPERM) or dst is not local, enter "reverse path" 4. In reverse path, call xfrm_decode_session_reverse() to get fl4_dec which reverses the original packet's flow (saddr<->daddr swapped) 5. If fl4_dec.saddr is local (we are the original destination), use __ip_route_output_key() for output route lookup 6. If fl4_dec.saddr is NOT local (we are a forwarding node), use ip_route_input() to simulate the reverse packet's input path 7. Finally, pass rt2 through xfrm_lookup() with XFRM_LOOKUP_ICMP flag The bug occurs in step 6: ip_route_input() is called with fl4_dec.daddr (original packet's source) as destination. If this address becomes local between the initial check and ip_route_input() call (e.g., due to concurrent "ip addr add"), ip_route_input() returns a LOCAL route with dst.output set to ip_rt_bug. This route is then used for ICMP output, causing dst_output() to call ip_rt_bug(), triggering a WARN_ON: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: net/ipv4/route.c:1275 at ip_rt_bug+0x21/0x30, CPU#1 Call Trace: <TASK> ip_push_pending_frames+0x202/0x240 icmp_push_reply+0x30d/0x430 __icmp_send+0x1149/0x24f0 ip_options_compile+0xa2/0xd0 ip_rcv_finish_core+0x829/0x1950 ip_rcv+0x2d7/0x420 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x185/0x1f0 netif_receive_skb+0x90/0x450 tun_get_user+0x3413/0x3fb0 tun_chr_write_iter+0xe4/0x220 ... Fix this by checking rt2->rt_type after ip_route_input(). If it's RTN_LOCAL, the route cannot be used for output, so treat it as an error. The reproducer requires kernel modification to widen the race window, making it unsuitable as a selftest. It is available at: https://gist.github.com/mrpre/eae853b72ac6a750f5d45d64ddac1e81

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: fix ip_rt_bug race in icmp_route_lookup reverse path icmp_route_lookup() performs multiple route lookups to find a suitable route for sending ICMP error messages, with special handling for XFRM (IPsec) policies. The lookup sequence is: 1. First, lookup output route for ICMP reply (dst = original src) 2. Pass through xfrm_lookup() for policy check 3. If blocked (-EPERM) or dst is not local, enter "reverse path" 4. In reverse path, call xfrm_decode_session_reverse() to get fl4_dec which reverses the original packet's flow (saddr<->daddr swapped) 5. If fl4_dec.saddr is local (we are the original destination), use __ip_route_output_key() for output route lookup 6. If fl4_dec.saddr is NOT local (we are a forwarding node), use ip_route_input() to simulate the reverse packet's input path 7. Finally, pass rt2 through xfrm_lookup() with XFRM_LOOKUP_ICMP flag The bug occurs in step 6: ip_route_input() is called with fl4_dec.daddr (original packet's source) as destination. If this address becomes local between the initial check and ip_route_input() call (e.g., due to concurrent "ip addr add"), ip_route_input() returns a LOCAL route with dst.output set to ip_rt_bug. This route is then used for ICMP output, causing dst_output() to call ip_rt_bug(), triggering a WARN_ON: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: net/ipv4/route.c:1275 at ip_rt_bug+0x21/0x30, CPU#1 Call Trace: <TASK> ip_push_pending_frames+0x202/0x240 icmp_push_reply+0x30d/0x430 __icmp_send+0x1149/0x24f0 ip_options_compile+0xa2/0xd0 ip_rcv_finish_core+0x829/0x1950 ip_rcv+0x2d7/0x420 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x185/0x1f0 netif_receive_skb+0x90/0x450 tun_get_user+0x3413/0x3fb0 tun_chr_write_iter+0xe4/0x220 ... Fix this by checking rt2->rt_type after ip_route_input(). If it's RTN_LOCAL, the route cannot be used for output, so treat it as an error. The reproducer requires kernel modification to widen the race window, making it unsuitable as a selftest. It is available at: https://gist.github.com/mrpre/eae853b72ac6a750f5d45d64ddac1e81

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: fix ip_rt_bug race in icmp_route_lookup reverse path icmp_route_lookup() performs multiple route lookups to find a suitable route for sending ICMP error messages, with special handling for XFRM (IPsec) policies. The lookup sequence is: 1. First, lookup output route for ICMP reply (dst = original src) 2. Pass through xfrm_lookup() for policy check 3. If blocked (-EPERM) or dst is not local, enter "reverse path" 4. In reverse path, call xfrm_decode_session_reverse() to get fl4_dec which reverses the original packet's flow (saddr<->daddr swapped) 5. If fl4_dec.saddr is local (we are the original destination), use __ip_route_output_key() for output route lookup 6. If fl4_dec.saddr is NOT local (we are a forwarding node), use ip_route_input() to simulate the reverse packet's input path 7. Finally, pass rt2 through xfrm_lookup() with XFRM_LOOKUP_ICMP flag The bug occurs in step 6: ip_route_input() is called with fl4_dec.daddr (original packet's source) as destination. If this address becomes local between the initial check and ip_route_input() call (e.g., due to concurrent "ip addr add"), ip_route_input() returns a LOCAL route with dst.output set to ip_rt_bug. This route is then used for ICMP output, causing dst_output() to call ip_rt_bug(), triggering a WARN_ON: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: net/ipv4/route.c:1275 at ip_rt_bug+0x21/0x30, CPU#1 Call Trace: <TASK> ip_push_pending_frames+0x202/0x240 icmp_push_reply+0x30d/0x430 __icmp_send+0x1149/0x24f0 ip_options_compile+0xa2/0xd0 ip_rcv_finish_core+0x829/0x1950 ip_rcv+0x2d7/0x420 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x185/0x1f0 netif_receive_skb+0x90/0x450 tun_get_user+0x3413/0x3fb0 tun_chr_write_iter+0xe4/0x220 ... Fix this by checking rt2->rt_type after ip_route_input(). If it's RTN_LOCAL, the route cannot be used for output, so treat it as an error. The reproducer requires kernel modification to widen the race window, making it unsuitable as a selftest. It is available at: https://gist.github.com/mrpre/eae853b72ac6a750f5d45d64ddac1e81

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1700Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1091Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43440 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45860 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45873 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45944 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45973 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46003 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-45880 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45881 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45882 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45883 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45885 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45895 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45900 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45921 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1029Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45857 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45858 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45871 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45877 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45920 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45923 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45886 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45890 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45893 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45895 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45898 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45911 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45885 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45886 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45890 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45893 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45895 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45898 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-45885 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45886 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45890 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45891 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45893 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45895 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45898 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45902 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45905 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45910 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45913 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45914 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45915 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45916 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45917 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 8b7817f3a959ed99d7443afc12f78a7e1fcc2063 < 9a95ec9144eeff1fc6fbcc21b677e322c6f1430b, 8b7817f3a959ed99d7443afc12f78a7e1fcc2063 < 2c1f59005da9dd4b07b26984fd719e36557dc57c, 8b7817f3a959ed99d7443afc12f78a7e1fcc2063 < b04061f89ffc6168e7ec3c71d0086ec3c3797228, 8b7817f3a959ed99d7443afc12f78a7e1fcc2063 < 1c9ef28f643cce34a6a6c36c8f4d6d60a60db7e1, 8b7817f3a959ed99d7443afc12f78a7e1fcc2063 < 423ce12d10b426709489d6b84fdaa6d2f31c5652, 8b7817f3a959ed99d7443afc12f78a7e1fcc2063 < 81b84de32bb27ae1ae2eb9acf0420e9d0d14bf00, 2.6.25
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.25, 6.1.165 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.128 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.75 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.14 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.4 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 May 2026 · Last source change 27 May 2026, 12:17 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32371
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enrichment underway

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-45905 · cve.blacktree.nl