BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-45842High confidence

slip: reject VJ receive packets on instances with no rstate array

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.94-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-32168

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slip: reject VJ receive packets on instances with no rstate array slhc_init() accepts rslots == 0 as a valid configuration, with the documented meaning of 'no receive compression'. In that case the allocation loop in slhc_init() is skipped, so comp->rstate stays NULL and comp->rslot_limit stays 0 (from the kzalloc of struct slcompress). The receive helpers do not defend against that configuration. slhc_uncompress() dereferences comp->rstate[x] when the VJ header carries an explicit connection ID, and slhc_remember() later assigns cs = &comp->rstate[...] after only comparing the packet's slot number to comp->rslot_limit. Because rslot_limit is 0, slot 0 passes the range check, and the code dereferences a NULL rstate. The configuration is reachable in-tree through PPP. PPPIOCSMAXCID stores its argument in a signed int, and (val >> 16) uses arithmetic shift. Passing 0xffff0000 therefore sign-extends to -1, so val2 + 1 is 0 and ppp_generic.c ends up calling slhc_init(0, 1). Because /dev/ppp open is gated by ns_capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN), the whole path is reachable from an unprivileged user namespace. Once the malformed VJ state is installed, any inbound VJ-compressed or VJ-uncompressed frame that selects slot 0 crashes the kernel in softirq context: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] RIP: 0010:slhc_uncompress (drivers/net/slip/slhc.c:519) Call Trace: <TASK> ppp_receive_nonmp_frame (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:2466) ppp_input (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:2359) ppp_async_process (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c:492) tasklet_action_common (kernel/softirq.c:926) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:623) run_ksoftirqd (kernel/softirq.c:1055) smpboot_thread_fn (kernel/smpboot.c:160) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:164) </TASK> Reject the receive side on such instances instead of touching rstate. slhc_uncompress() falls through to its existing 'bad' label, which bumps sls_i_error and enters the toss state. slhc_remember() mirrors that with an explicit sls_i_error increment followed by slhc_toss(); the sls_i_runt counter is not used here because a missing rstate is an internal configuration state, not a runt packet. The transmit path is unaffected: the only in-tree caller that picks rslots from userspace (ppp_generic.c) still supplies tslots >= 1, and slip.c always calls slhc_init(16, 16), so comp->tstate remains valid and slhc_compress() continues to work.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slip: reject VJ receive packets on instances with no rstate array slhc_init() accepts rslots == 0 as a valid configuration, with the documented meaning of 'no receive compression'. In that case the allocation loop in slhc_init() is skipped, so comp->rstate stays NULL and comp->rslot_limit stays 0 (from the kzalloc of struct slcompress). The receive helpers do not defend against that configuration. slhc_uncompress() dereferences comp->rstate[x] when the VJ header carries an explicit connection ID, and slhc_remember() later assigns cs = &comp->rstate[...] after only comparing the packet's slot number to comp->rslot_limit. Because rslot_limit is 0, slot 0 passes the range check, and the code dereferences a NULL rstate. The configuration is reachable in-tree through PPP. PPPIOCSMAXCID stores its argument in a signed int, and (val >> 16) uses arithmetic shift. Passing 0xffff0000 therefore sign-extends to -1, so val2 + 1 is 0 and ppp_generic.c ends up calling slhc_init(0, 1). Because /dev/ppp open is gated by ns_capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN), the whole path is reachable from an unprivileged user namespace. Once the malformed VJ state is installed, any inbound VJ-compressed or VJ-uncompressed frame that selects slot 0 crashes the kernel in softirq context: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] RIP: 0010:slhc_uncompress (drivers/net/slip/slhc.c:519) Call Trace: <TASK> ppp_receive_nonmp_frame (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:2466) ppp_input (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:2359) ppp_async_process (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c:492) tasklet_action_common (kernel/softirq.c:926) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:623) run_ksoftirqd (kernel/softirq.c:1055) smpboot_thread_fn (kernel/smpboot.c:160) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:164) </TASK> Reject the receive side on such instances instead of touching rstate. slhc_uncompress() falls through to its existing 'bad' label, which bumps sls_i_error and enters the toss state. slhc_remember() mirrors that with an explicit sls_i_error increment followed by slhc_toss(); the sls_i_runt counter is not used here because a missing rstate is an internal configuration state, not a runt packet. The transmit path is unaffected: the only in-tree caller that picks rslots from userspace (ppp_generic.c) still supplies tslots >= 1, and slip.c always calls slhc_init(16, 16), so comp->tstate remains valid and slhc_compress() continues to work.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slip: reject VJ receive packets on instances with no rstate array slhc_init() accepts rslots == 0 as a valid configuration, with the documented meaning of 'no receive compression'. In that case the allocation loop in slhc_init() is skipped, so comp->rstate stays NULL and comp->rslot_limit stays 0 (from the kzalloc of struct slcompress). The receive helpers do not defend against that configuration. slhc_uncompress() dereferences comp->rstate[x] when the VJ header carries an explicit connection ID, and slhc_remember() later assigns cs = &comp->rstate[...] after only comparing the packet's slot number to comp->rslot_limit. Because rslot_limit is 0, slot 0 passes the range check, and the code dereferences a NULL rstate. The configuration is reachable in-tree through PPP. PPPIOCSMAXCID stores its argument in a signed int, and (val >> 16) uses arithmetic shift. Passing 0xffff0000 therefore sign-extends to -1, so val2 + 1 is 0 and ppp_generic.c ends up calling slhc_init(0, 1). Because /dev/ppp open is gated by ns_capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN), the whole path is reachable from an unprivileged user namespace. Once the malformed VJ state is installed, any inbound VJ-compressed or VJ-uncompressed frame that selects slot 0 crashes the kernel in softirq context: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] RIP: 0010:slhc_uncompress (drivers/net/slip/slhc.c:519) Call Trace: <TASK> ppp_receive_nonmp_frame (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:2466) ppp_input (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:2359) ppp_async_process (drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c:492) tasklet_action_common (kernel/softirq.c:926) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:623) run_ksoftirqd (kernel/softirq.c:1055) smpboot_thread_fn (kernel/smpboot.c:160) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:164) </TASK> Reject the receive side on such instances instead of touching rstate. slhc_uncompress() falls through to its existing 'bad' label, which bumps sls_i_error and enters the toss state. slhc_remember() mirrors that with an explicit sls_i_error increment followed by slhc_toss(); the sls_i_runt counter is not used here because a missing rstate is an internal configuration state, not a runt packet. The transmit path is unaffected: the only in-tree caller that picks rslots from userspace (ppp_generic.c) still supplies tslots >= 1, and slip.c always calls slhc_init(16, 16), so comp->tstate remains valid and slhc_compress() continues to work.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1691Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand oder andere Auswirkungen herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260603Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 3 Jun 2026, published on 3 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45847 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45848 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45847 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45848 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45856 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45855 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45858 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45899 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45847 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45848 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45856 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45847 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45848 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45849 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45847 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45848 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45848 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45856 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45862 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45870 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45850 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45930 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45856 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45862 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45870 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45878 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0809Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43331 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45850 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45930 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45856 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45878 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45886 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45898 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0782Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45447 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45852 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45856 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45870 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45878 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45886 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0731Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

ource(s) Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-39833 du 27 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-43503 du 27 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-46300 du 27 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45834 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45835 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45836 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45838 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45839 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45840 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45841 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45842 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45843 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45844 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45845 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45846 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45986 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45987 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45988 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45989 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45991 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-45993 du 28 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Mic

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-021335LinuxのLinux KernelにおけるNULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。slipでは、rstate配列が存在しないインスタンスでのVJ受信パケットを拒否します。slhc_init()はrslotsが0の場合を「受信圧縮なし」として有効な構成だと認識します。この場合、slhc_init()内の割り当てループはスキップされ、comp-rstateはNULLのままであり、comp-rslot_limitはstruct slcompressのkzallocによって0のまま保持されます。受信ヘルパーはこの構成に対して防御していません。VJヘッダーが明示的な接続IDを保持する場合、slhc_uncompress()はcomp-rstate[x]を参照し、slhc_remember()はパケットのスロット番号とcomp-rslot_limitを比較した後にcs = &comp-rstate[...]を割り当てます。rslot_limitが0であるため、スロット0は範囲チェックを通過してNULLのrstateをデリファレンスします。この構成はPPPを介してツリー内で到達可能です。PPPIOCSMAXCIDでは引数を符号付きintに格納し、(val 16)は算術シフトを使用しています。そのため、0xffff0000を渡すと符号拡張により-1となり、val2 + 1は0となってppp_generic.cはslhc_init(0, 1)を呼び出します。/dev/pppのオープンはns_capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)で制御されているため、この経路は特権のないユーザ名前空間からも到達可能です。形成不良のVJ状態がインストールされると、任意の受信VJ圧縮または非圧縮フレームがスロット0を選択し、それがsoftirqコンテキストでカーネルクラッシュを引き起こします。これに対しては、rstateを参照する代わりに、そのようなインスタンスの受信側を拒否します。slhc_uncompress()は既存の'bad'ラベルにフォールスルーし、sls_i_errorをインクリメントしてtoss状態に入ります。slhc_remember()も明示的にsls_i_errorをインクリメントし、slhc_toss()を呼び出します。sls_i_runtカウンターはここでは使用されません。送信経路には影響はありません。ユーザ空間からrslotsを選ぶツリー内の唯一の呼び出し(ppp_generic.c)は依然としてtslots = 1を供給しており、slip.cは常にslhc_init(16, 16)を呼び出すため、comp-tstateは有効なままであり、slhc_compress()は引き続き動作します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 4ab42d78e37a294ac7bc56901d563c642e03c4ae < 3d71c961febddd855d3ae9a519eeb96c8023f430, 4ab42d78e37a294ac7bc56901d563c642e03c4ae < 72304fec672e8aac9ee7b9c475db96b37cca8d8d, 4ab42d78e37a294ac7bc56901d563c642e03c4ae < 4aa9eca6fda2919027dfd7a7cc69334982d89586, 4ab42d78e37a294ac7bc56901d563c642e03c4ae < c6980e8b1a86288167f34966fa5219031999b6f1, 4ab42d78e37a294ac7bc56901d563c642e03c4ae < de42f86e2cf5028a97e74c25869d1a962b13c301, 4ab42d78e37a294ac7bc56901d563c642e03c4ae < 9e1ff0eead073c4f46d874ad2526b7dda5465faf, 4ab42d78e37a294ac7bc56901d563c642e03c4ae < 7b0d9e878ec2b21d99ae8051b3dda59cdb66c152, 4ab42d78e37a294ac7bc56901d563c642e03c4ae < e76607442d5b73e1ba6768f501ef815bb58c2c0e, 42fc512469e78939c1e419d3310c47de55bdcbb8, df085f1cb3acd3d75408ff94f366983873bce7d2, a1c3860d3c5fc62bd35f089bcb03f18a37242de9, f82699de104eaf8a7ffc2849a566a94818dd8a3c, 354b254af5c1350de9586af75fe5a821b35bfb33, 5148857f5d4c812cc918cf4627f7880521e987eb, 82185755d90c8047c6f4b589c39998ff3d4ca3ad, a50a93cc99286dc444c7e5ccc7dfb9d58c2d346d, 6b4fa561e26526c62636414d267342c945084f44, 2.6.32.70 < 2.6.33, 3.2.75 < 3.3, 3.4.111 < 3.5, 3.10.96 < 3.11, 3.12.53 < 3.13, 3.14.60 < 3.15, 3.18.27 < 3.19, 4.1.17 < 4.2, 4.3.5 < 4.4, 4.4
Fixed
Linux: < 4.4, 5.10.258 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.141 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.91 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.33 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.10 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Jun 2026, 17:46 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-32168
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-45842 · cve.blacktree.nl