BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43620High confidence

Rsync < 3.4.3 Out-of-Bounds Array Read via recv_files()

RsyncProject · rsync

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-28PW-R563-RXVM ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

6.9MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.46% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs RsyncProject rsync and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

8 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainrsyncVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.4.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainrsyncVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.4.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainrsyncVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.4.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcersyncVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.4.1+ds1-5+deb13u3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcersyncVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.2.7-1+deb12u5Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcersyncVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.4.3+ds1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcersyncVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.4.3+ds1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiversyncVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.3.2.7-1ubuntu1.4Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43620 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityrsync: rsync: Remote Denial of Service via Out-of-bounds Read
17 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • rsync-daemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • rsync-rrsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • rsync-daemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Summary
A flaw was found in rsync. A malicious rsync server can exploit an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the `recv_files()` function. By manipulating compatibility flags and transfer records, the server can cause a connecting client to attempt to read memory outside of allocated bounds. This can lead to a segmentation fault, resulting in a denial of service for the client.
Remediation
To mitigate this issue, rsync clients can be configured to disable incremental recursion when pulling from untrusted sources. This can be achieved by using the `--no-inc-recursive` option. Example: `rsync --no-inc-recursive [OPTIONS] SOURCE DESTINATION` Disabling incremental recursion may affect the efficiency of transfers for large, frequently updated directories.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-31012

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

Rsync version 3.4.2 and prior contain a receiver-side out-of-bounds array read vulnerability in recv_files() in receiver.c that allows a malicious rsync server to crash the rsync client process. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by setting CF_INC_RECURSE in compatibility flags and sending a specially crafted file list where the first sorted entry is not the leading dot directory, followed by a transfer record with ndx=0 and an iflag word without ITEM_TRANSFER, causing the receiver to read 8 bytes before the allocated pointer array and dereference an invalid pointer at an unmapped address, resulting in a deterministic SIGSEGV crash of the rsync client.

What

Rsync version 3.4.2 and prior contain a receiver-side out-of-bounds array read vulnerability in recv_files() in receiver.c that allows a malicious rsync server to crash the rsync client process. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by setting CF_INC_RECURSE in compatibility flags and sending a specially crafted file list where the first sorted entry is not the leading dot directory, followed by a transfer record with ndx=0 and an iflag word without ITEM_TRANSFER, causing the receiver to read 8 bytes before the allocated pointer array and dereference an invalid pointer at an unmapped address, resulting in a deterministic SIGSEGV crash of the rsync client.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

Rsync version 3.4.2 and prior contain a receiver-side out-of-bounds array read vulnerability in recv_files() in receiver.c that allows a malicious rsync server to crash the rsync client process. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by setting CF_INC_RECURSE in compatibility flags and sending a specially crafted file list where the first sorted entry is not the leading dot directory, followed by a transfer record with ndx=0 and an iflag word without ITEM_TRANSFER, causing the receiver to read 8 bytes before the allocated pointer array and dereference an invalid pointer at an unmapped address, resulting in a deterministic SIGSEGV crash of the rsync client.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Read → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Active interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIActiveUser interaction: A user must take a deliberate action for exploitation to succeed.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VAHighVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2817Rsync: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Rsync ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Daten offenzulegen oder zu manipulieren, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2455Oracle Solaris Drittanbieterkomponenten: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in verschiedenen Komponenten von Drittanbietern in Oracle Solaris ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1611Rsync: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Rsync ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, und um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-016847Samba Projectのrsyncにおける境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Rsync バージョン 3.4.2 およびそれ以前には、receiver.c の recv_files() に受信側の境界外配列読み取りの脆弱性が存在し、悪意のある rsync サーバーが rsync クライアントプロセスをクラッシュさせる可能性があります。攻撃者は、互換性フラグで CF_INC_RECURSE を設定し、最初のソートされたエントリが先頭のドットディレクトリでなく、続いて ndx=0 の転送レコードと ITEM_TRANSFER を含まない iflag ワードを持つ特別に細工されたファイルリストを送信することで、この脆弱性を悪用できます。これにより、受信側は割り当てられたポインター配列の8バイト前を読み取り、マップされていないアドレスの無効なポインターを逆参照して、rsync クライアントが決定的な SIGSEGV クラッシュを引き起こします。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
To mitigate this issue, rsync clients can be configured to disable incremental recursion when pulling from untrusted sources. This can be achieved by using the `--no-inc-recursive` option. Example: `rsync --no-inc-recursive [OPTIONS] SOURCE DESTINATION` Disabling incremental recursion may affect the efficiency of transfers for large, frequently updated directories.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-31012
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; rsync-daemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; rsync-rrsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; rsync-daemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; rsync-daemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; rsync-rrsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
    After
    rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; rsync-daemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; rsync-rrsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10; rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; rsync-daemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; rsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; rsync-daemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; rsync-rrsync as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; rsync.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4; openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43620 · cve.blacktree.nl