BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43492High confidence

lib/crypto: mpi: Fix integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.88-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-43492 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 15 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43492
262 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/crypto: mpi: Fix integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() Yiming reports an integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() when subtracting "lzeros" from the unsigned "nbytes". For this to happen, the scatterlist "sgl" needs to occupy more bytes than the "nbytes" parameter and the first "nbytes + 1" bytes of the scatterlist must be zero. Under these conditions, the while loop iterating over the scatterlist will count more zeroes than "nbytes", subtract the number of zeroes from "nbytes" and cause the underflow. When commit 2d4d1eea540b ("lib/mpi: Add mpi sgl helpers") originally introduced the bug, it couldn't be triggered because all callers of mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() passed a scatterlist whose length was equal to "nbytes". However since commit 63ba4d67594a ("KEYS: asymmetric: Use new crypto interface without scatterlists"), the underflow can now actually be triggered. When invoking a KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPT system call with a larger "out_len" than "in_len" and filling the "in" buffer with zeroes, crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() will create an all-zero scatterlist used for both the "src" and "dst" member of struct akcipher_request and thereby fulfil the conditions to trigger the bug: sys_keyctl() keyctl_pkey_e_d_s() asymmetric_key_eds_op() software_key_eds_op() crypto_akcipher_sync_encrypt() crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() crypto_akcipher_encrypt() rsa_enc() mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() To the user this will be visible as a DoS as the kernel spins forever, causing soft lockup splats as a side effect. Fix it.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/crypto: mpi: Fix integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() Yiming reports an integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() when subtracting "lzeros" from the unsigned "nbytes". For this to happen, the scatterlist "sgl" needs to occupy more bytes than the "nbytes" parameter and the first "nbytes + 1" bytes of the scatterlist must be zero. Under these conditions, the while loop iterating over the scatterlist will count more zeroes than "nbytes", subtract the number of zeroes from "nbytes" and cause the underflow. When commit 2d4d1eea540b ("lib/mpi: Add mpi sgl helpers") originally introduced the bug, it couldn't be triggered because all callers of mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() passed a scatterlist whose length was equal to "nbytes". However since commit 63ba4d67594a ("KEYS: asymmetric: Use new crypto interface without scatterlists"), the underflow can now actually be triggered. When invoking a KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPT system call with a larger "out_len" than "in_len" and filling the "in" buffer with zeroes, crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() will create an all-zero scatterlist used for both the "src" and "dst" member of struct akcipher_request and thereby fulfil the conditions to trigger the bug: sys_keyctl() keyctl_pkey_e_d_s() asymmetric_key_eds_op() software_key_eds_op() crypto_akcipher_sync_encrypt() crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() crypto_akcipher_encrypt() rsa_enc() mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() To the user this will be visible as a DoS as the kernel spins forever, causing soft lockup splats as a side effect. Fix it.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-30878

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/crypto: mpi: Fix integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() Yiming reports an integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() when subtracting "lzeros" from the unsigned "nbytes". For this to happen, the scatterlist "sgl" needs to occupy more bytes than the "nbytes" parameter and the first "nbytes + 1" bytes of the scatterlist must be zero. Under these conditions, the while loop iterating over the scatterlist will count more zeroes than "nbytes", subtract the number of zeroes from "nbytes" and cause the underflow. When commit 2d4d1eea540b ("lib/mpi: Add mpi sgl helpers") originally introduced the bug, it couldn't be triggered because all callers of mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() passed a scatterlist whose length was equal to "nbytes". However since commit 63ba4d67594a ("KEYS: asymmetric: Use new crypto interface without scatterlists"), the underflow can now actually be triggered. When invoking a KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPT system call with a larger "out_len" than "in_len" and filling the "in" buffer with zeroes, crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() will create an all-zero scatterlist used for both the "src" and "dst" member of struct akcipher_request and thereby fulfil the conditions to trigger the bug: sys_keyctl() keyctl_pkey_e_d_s() asymmetric_key_eds_op() software_key_eds_op() crypto_akcipher_sync_encrypt() crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() crypto_akcipher_encrypt() rsa_enc() mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() To the user this will be visible as a DoS as the kernel spins forever, causing soft lockup splats as a side effect. Fix it.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/crypto: mpi: Fix integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() Yiming reports an integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() when subtracting "lzeros" from the unsigned "nbytes". For this to happen, the scatterlist "sgl" needs to occupy more bytes than the "nbytes" parameter and the first "nbytes + 1" bytes of the scatterlist must be zero. Under these conditions, the while loop iterating over the scatterlist will count more zeroes than "nbytes", subtract the number of zeroes from "nbytes" and cause the underflow. When commit 2d4d1eea540b ("lib/mpi: Add mpi sgl helpers") originally introduced the bug, it couldn't be triggered because all callers of mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() passed a scatterlist whose length was equal to "nbytes". However since commit 63ba4d67594a ("KEYS: asymmetric: Use new crypto interface without scatterlists"), the underflow can now actually be triggered. When invoking a KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPT system call with a larger "out_len" than "in_len" and filling the "in" buffer with zeroes, crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() will create an all-zero scatterlist used for both the "src" and "dst" member of struct akcipher_request and thereby fulfil the conditions to trigger the bug: sys_keyctl() keyctl_pkey_e_d_s() asymmetric_key_eds_op() software_key_eds_op() crypto_akcipher_sync_encrypt() crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() crypto_akcipher_encrypt() rsa_enc() mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() To the user this will be visible as a DoS as the kernel spins forever, causing soft lockup splats as a side effect. Fix it.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/crypto: mpi: Fix integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() Yiming reports an integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() when subtracting "lzeros" from the unsigned "nbytes". For this to happen, the scatterlist "sgl" needs to occupy more bytes than the "nbytes" parameter and the first "nbytes + 1" bytes of the scatterlist must be zero. Under these conditions, the while loop iterating over the scatterlist will count more zeroes than "nbytes", subtract the number of zeroes from "nbytes" and cause the underflow. When commit 2d4d1eea540b ("lib/mpi: Add mpi sgl helpers") originally introduced the bug, it couldn't be triggered because all callers of mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() passed a scatterlist whose length was equal to "nbytes". However since commit 63ba4d67594a ("KEYS: asymmetric: Use new crypto interface without scatterlists"), the underflow can now actually be triggered. When invoking a KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPT system call with a larger "out_len" than "in_len" and filling the "in" buffer with zeroes, crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() will create an all-zero scatterlist used for both the "src" and "dst" member of struct akcipher_request and thereby fulfil the conditions to trigger the bug: sys_keyctl() keyctl_pkey_e_d_s() asymmetric_key_eds_op() software_key_eds_op() crypto_akcipher_sync_encrypt() crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() crypto_akcipher_encrypt() rsa_enc() mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() To the user this will be visible as a DoS as the kernel spins forever, causing soft lockup splats as a side effect. Fix it.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/crypto: mpi: Fix integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() Yiming reports an integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() when subtracting "lzeros" from the unsigned "nbytes". For this to happen, the scatterlist "sgl" needs to occupy more bytes than the "nbytes" parameter and the first "nbytes + 1" bytes of the scatterlist must be zero. Under these conditions, the while loop iterating over the scatterlist will count more zeroes than "nbytes", subtract the number of zeroes from "nbytes" and cause the underflow. When commit 2d4d1eea540b ("lib/mpi: Add mpi sgl helpers") originally introduced the bug, it couldn't be triggered because all callers of mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() passed a scatterlist whose length was equal to "nbytes". However since commit 63ba4d67594a ("KEYS: asymmetric: Use new crypto interface without scatterlists"), the underflow can now actually be triggered. When invoking a KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPT system call with a larger "out_len" than "in_len" and filling the "in" buffer with zeroes, crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() will create an all-zero scatterlist used for both the "src" and "dst" member of struct akcipher_request and thereby fulfil the conditions to trigger the bug: sys_keyctl() keyctl_pkey_e_d_s() asymmetric_key_eds_op() software_key_eds_op() crypto_akcipher_sync_encrypt() crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() crypto_akcipher_encrypt() rsa_enc() mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() To the user this will be visible as a DoS as the kernel spins forever, causing soft lockup splats as a side effect. Fix it.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-30878Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: lib/crypto: mpi: Fix integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() Yiming reports an integer underflow in mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() when subtracting "lzeros" from the unsigned "nbytes". For this to happen, the scatterlist "sgl" needs to occupy more bytes than the "nbytes" parameter and the first "nbytes + 1" bytes of the scatterlist must be zero. Under these conditions, the while loop iterating over the scatterlist will count more zeroes than "nbytes", subtract the number of zeroes from "nbytes" and cause the underflow. When commit 2d4d1eea540b ("lib/mpi: Add mpi sgl helpers") originally introduced the bug, it couldn't be triggered because all callers of mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() passed a scatterlist whose length was equal to "nbytes". However since commit 63ba4d67594a ("KEYS: asymmetric: Use new crypto interface without scatterlists"), the underflow can now actually be triggered. When invoking a KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPT system call with a larger "out_len" than "in_len" and filling the "in" buffer with zeroes, crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() will create an all-zero scatterlist used for both the "src" and "dst" member of struct akcipher_request and thereby fulfil the conditions to trigger the bug: sys_keyctl() keyctl_pkey_e_d_s() asymmetric_key_eds_op() software_key_eds_op() crypto_akcipher_sync_encrypt() crypto_akcipher_sync_prep() crypto_akcipher_encrypt() rsa_enc() mpi_read_raw_from_sgl() To the user this will be visible as a DoS as the kernel spins forever, causing soft lockup splats as a side effect. Fix it.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1587Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260520Security Bulletin 20 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 20 May 2026, published on 20 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-10263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31486 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43484 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1162Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-10263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31486 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43484 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43465 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43468 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43471 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43484 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43468 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43471 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43475 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43484 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0900Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43437 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43456 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45912 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45948 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45960 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45970 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43456 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43219 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43421 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-021369LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、lib/cryptoのmpi_read_raw_from_sgl()関数に整数アンダーフローの脆弱性が存在していました。この脆弱性は、scatterlistの長さが指定されたバイト数より長く、かつ先頭のバイトがすべてゼロの場合に発生し、不正な減算によってアンダーフローが起こります。これにより、KEYCTL_PKEY_ENCRYPTシステムコールを特定の条件で呼び出すと、カーネル内で無限ループが発生し、サービス拒否（DoS）状態を引き起こす可能性がありました。本問題は修正されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.4, 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-30878
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < a1793a48881ec8d26e9c79b0ee65753f1c6846a4; 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 1abd50fc3cfa16fc2074a3c8c2729c50fd9d7043; 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 6d63615c796c085b4984e3031b9fa77fffb47360; 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 2aa77a18dc7f2670497fe3ee5acbeda0b57659e5; 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 26d3a97ad46c7a9226ec04d4bf35bd4998a97d16; 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 8637dfb4c1d8a7026ef681f2477c6de8b71c4003; 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 30e513e755bb381afce6fb57cdc8694136193f22; 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 8c2f1288250a90a4b5cabed5d888d7e3aeed4035 · Fixed: < 4.4; 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*; 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*
    After
    Linux: 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < a1793a48881ec8d26e9c79b0ee65753f1c6846a4, 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 1abd50fc3cfa16fc2074a3c8c2729c50fd9d7043, 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 6d63615c796c085b4984e3031b9fa77fffb47360, 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 2aa77a18dc7f2670497fe3ee5acbeda0b57659e5, 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 26d3a97ad46c7a9226ec04d4bf35bd4998a97d16, 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 8637dfb4c1d8a7026ef681f2477c6de8b71c4003, 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 30e513e755bb381afce6fb57cdc8694136193f22, 2d4d1eea540b27c72488fd1914674c42473d53df < 8c2f1288250a90a4b5cabed5d888d7e3aeed4035, 4.4 · Fixed: Linux: < 4.4, 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.176 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.140 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.7 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-30878↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43492 · cve.blacktree.nl