BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43455High confidence

mctp: route: hold key->lock in mctp_flow_prepare_output()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-28761

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mctp: route: hold key->lock in mctp_flow_prepare_output() mctp_flow_prepare_output() checks key->dev and may call mctp_dev_set_key(), but it does not hold key->lock while doing so. mctp_dev_set_key() and mctp_dev_release_key() are annotated with __must_hold(&key->lock), so key->dev access is intended to be serialized by key->lock. The mctp_sendmsg() transmit path reaches mctp_flow_prepare_output() via mctp_local_output() -> mctp_dst_output() without holding key->lock, so the check-and-set sequence is racy. Example interleaving: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- mctp_flow_prepare_output(key, devA) if (!key->dev) // sees NULL mctp_flow_prepare_output( key, devB) if (!key->dev) // still NULL mctp_dev_set_key(devB, key) mctp_dev_hold(devB) key->dev = devB mctp_dev_set_key(devA, key) mctp_dev_hold(devA) key->dev = devA // overwrites devB Now both devA and devB references were acquired, but only the final key->dev value is tracked for release. One reference can be lost, causing a resource leak as mctp_dev_release_key() would only decrease the reference on one dev. Fix by taking key->lock around the key->dev check and mctp_dev_set_key() call.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mctp: route: hold key->lock in mctp_flow_prepare_output() mctp_flow_prepare_output() checks key->dev and may call mctp_dev_set_key(), but it does not hold key->lock while doing so. mctp_dev_set_key() and mctp_dev_release_key() are annotated with __must_hold(&key->lock), so key->dev access is intended to be serialized by key->lock. The mctp_sendmsg() transmit path reaches mctp_flow_prepare_output() via mctp_local_output() -> mctp_dst_output() without holding key->lock, so the check-and-set sequence is racy. Example interleaving: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- mctp_flow_prepare_output(key, devA) if (!key->dev) // sees NULL mctp_flow_prepare_output( key, devB) if (!key->dev) // still NULL mctp_dev_set_key(devB, key) mctp_dev_hold(devB) key->dev = devB mctp_dev_set_key(devA, key) mctp_dev_hold(devA) key->dev = devA // overwrites devB Now both devA and devB references were acquired, but only the final key->dev value is tracked for release. One reference can be lost, causing a resource leak as mctp_dev_release_key() would only decrease the reference on one dev. Fix by taking key->lock around the key->dev check and mctp_dev_set_key() call.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mctp: route: hold key->lock in mctp_flow_prepare_output() mctp_flow_prepare_output() checks key->dev and may call mctp_dev_set_key(), but it does not hold key->lock while doing so. mctp_dev_set_key() and mctp_dev_release_key() are annotated with __must_hold(&key->lock), so key->dev access is intended to be serialized by key->lock. The mctp_sendmsg() transmit path reaches mctp_flow_prepare_output() via mctp_local_output() -> mctp_dst_output() without holding key->lock, so the check-and-set sequence is racy. Example interleaving: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- mctp_flow_prepare_output(key, devA) if (!key->dev) // sees NULL mctp_flow_prepare_output( key, devB) if (!key->dev) // still NULL mctp_dev_set_key(devB, key) mctp_dev_hold(devB) key->dev = devB mctp_dev_set_key(devA, key) mctp_dev_hold(devA) key->dev = devA // overwrites devB Now both devA and devB references were acquired, but only the final key->dev value is tracked for release. One reference can be lost, causing a resource leak as mctp_dev_release_key() would only decrease the reference on one dev. Fix by taking key->lock around the key->dev check and mctp_dev_set_key() call.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1454Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43449 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43452 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43453 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43456 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43457 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43465 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43449 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43452 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43453 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43456 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43457 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43468 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43449 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43452 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43453 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43456 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43457 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43459 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43468 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43456 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43472 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0782Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-016673LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。mctp: route: mctp_flow_prepare_output()内でkey-lockを保持していない問題です。mctp_flow_prepare_output()はkey-devをチェックし、場合によってはmctp_dev_set_key()を呼び出しますが、その処理中にkey-lockを保持していません。mctp_dev_set_key()およびmctp_dev_release_key()は__must_hold(&key-lock)で注釈されており、key-devへのアクセスはkey-lockによって直列化されることが意図されています。mctp_sendmsg()の送信パスはmctp_local_output() - mctp_dst_output()を経由してmctp_flow_prepare_output()に達しますが、この間にkey-lockを保持していないため、チェックと設定のシーケンスにレースコンディションがあります。例として、以下のインターリーブが考えられます。CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- mctp_flow_prepare_output(key, devA) if (!key-dev) // NULLと認識 mctp_flow_prepare_output( key, devB) if (!key-dev) // まだNULL mctp_dev_set_key(devB, key) mctp_dev_hold(devB) key-dev = devB mctp_dev_set_key(devA, key) mctp_dev_hold(devA) key-dev = devA // devBを上書きになります。これによりdevAとdevBの参照が両方取得されますが、最終的なkey-devの値だけが解放のために追跡されます。これによって、1つの参照が失われ、mctp_dev_release_key()が1つのdevの参照しか減らさないため、リソースリークが発生する可能性があります。解決策として、key-devのチェックおよびmctp_dev_set_key()の呼び出しの前後でkey-lockを保持するようにしました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 67737c457281dd199ceb9e31b6ba7efd3bfe566d < 47893166bc5611ee9a20de6b8d2933b2320fb772, 67737c457281dd199ceb9e31b6ba7efd3bfe566d < 86f5334fcb48a5b611c33364ab52ca684d0f6d91, 67737c457281dd199ceb9e31b6ba7efd3bfe566d < 0695712f3a6f1a48915f95767cfb42077683dcdc, 67737c457281dd199ceb9e31b6ba7efd3bfe566d < 925a5ffd99cddd7a7e41d5ad120c7a2c6d50260f, 67737c457281dd199ceb9e31b6ba7efd3bfe566d < 8d27d9b260dd19c1b519e1a13de6448f9984e30e, 67737c457281dd199ceb9e31b6ba7efd3bfe566d < 7d86aa41c073c4e7eb75fd2e674f1fd8f289728a, 5.16
Fixed
Linux: < 5.16, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.78 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.19 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.9 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 May 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:24 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-28761
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43455 · cve.blacktree.nl