BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43405High confidence

libceph: Use u32 for non-negative values in ceph_monmap_decode()

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.70% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43405 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 20 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43405
151 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: Use u32 for non-negative values in ceph_monmap_decode() This patch fixes unnecessary implicit conversions that change signedness of blob_len and num_mon in ceph_monmap_decode(). Currently blob_len and num_mon are (signed) int variables. They are used to hold values that are always non-negative and get assigned in ceph_decode_32_safe(), which is meant to assign u32 values. Both variables are subsequently used as unsigned values, and the value of num_mon is further assigned to monmap->num_mon, which is of type u32. Therefore, both variables should be of type u32. This is especially relevant for num_mon. If the value read from the incoming message is very large, it is interpreted as a negative value, and the check for num_mon > CEPH_MAX_MON does not catch it. This leads to the attempt to allocate a very large chunk of memory for monmap, which will most likely fail. In this case, an unnecessary attempt to allocate memory is performed, and -ENOMEM is returned instead of -EINVAL.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-28711

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: Use u32 for non-negative values in ceph_monmap_decode() This patch fixes unnecessary implicit conversions that change signedness of blob_len and num_mon in ceph_monmap_decode(). Currently blob_len and num_mon are (signed) int variables. They are used to hold values that are always non-negative and get assigned in ceph_decode_32_safe(), which is meant to assign u32 values. Both variables are subsequently used as unsigned values, and the value of num_mon is further assigned to monmap->num_mon, which is of type u32. Therefore, both variables should be of type u32. This is especially relevant for num_mon. If the value read from the incoming message is very large, it is interpreted as a negative value, and the check for num_mon > CEPH_MAX_MON does not catch it. This leads to the attempt to allocate a very large chunk of memory for monmap, which will most likely fail. In this case, an unnecessary attempt to allocate memory is performed, and -ENOMEM is returned instead of -EINVAL.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: Use u32 for non-negative values in ceph_monmap_decode() This patch fixes unnecessary implicit conversions that change signedness of blob_len and num_mon in ceph_monmap_decode(). Currently blob_len and num_mon are (signed) int variables. They are used to hold values that are always non-negative and get assigned in ceph_decode_32_safe(), which is meant to assign u32 values. Both variables are subsequently used as unsigned values, and the value of num_mon is further assigned to monmap->num_mon, which is of type u32. Therefore, both variables should be of type u32. This is especially relevant for num_mon. If the value read from the incoming message is very large, it is interpreted as a negative value, and the check for num_mon > CEPH_MAX_MON does not catch it. This leads to the attempt to allocate a very large chunk of memory for monmap, which will most likely fail. In this case, an unnecessary attempt to allocate memory is performed, and -ENOMEM is returned instead of -EINVAL.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: Use u32 for non-negative values in ceph_monmap_decode() This patch fixes unnecessary implicit conversions that change signedness of blob_len and num_mon in ceph_monmap_decode(). Currently blob_len and num_mon are (signed) int variables. They are used to hold values that are always non-negative and get assigned in ceph_decode_32_safe(), which is meant to assign u32 values. Both variables are subsequently used as unsigned values, and the value of num_mon is further assigned to monmap->num_mon, which is of type u32. Therefore, both variables should be of type u32. This is especially relevant for num_mon. If the value read from the incoming message is very large, it is interpreted as a negative value, and the check for num_mon > CEPH_MAX_MON does not catch it. This leads to the attempt to allocate a very large chunk of memory for monmap, which will most likely fail. In this case, an unnecessary attempt to allocate memory is performed, and -ENOMEM is returned instead of -EINVAL.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use of Uninitialized Resource → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-908 ↗

CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource. The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-908
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1454Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43370 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43373 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43380 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43370 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43373 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43379 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43380 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43379 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43380 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43409 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43415 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43370 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43373 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43380 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43373 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43374 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43415 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43437 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43445 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43449 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43409 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43415 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43409 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-016890LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。libcephのceph_monmap_decode()関数内で非負値に対してu32型を使用する問題がありました。このパッチは、ceph_monmap_decode()内でblob_lenおよびnum_monの符号を不必要に変更する暗黙の型変換を修正します。現在、blob_lenとnum_monは符号付きのint型変数ですが、これらは常に非負の値を保持し、u32値を割り当てることを目的としたceph_decode_32_safe()で設定されています。両変数はその後、符号なしの値として使用され、num_monの値はさらにu32型のmonmap-num_monに割り当てられます。したがって、両変数はu32型であるべきです。特にnum_monについては重要です。受信メッセージから読み取られた値が非常に大きい場合、それは負の値として解釈され、num_mon CEPH_MAX_MONのチェックを通過してしまいます。これによりmonmap用に非常に大きなメモリを確保しようとし、通常は失敗します。この場合、不必要なメモリ確保の試みが行われ、-EINVALではなく-ENOMEMが返されます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.11, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.78 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.19 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.9 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC · CWE-908 · Use of Uninitialized Resource

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-28711
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43405 · cve.blacktree.nl