BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43402High confidence

kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.67% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

17 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 13 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-28708

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 13 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free Guillaume reported crashes via corrupted RCU callback function pointers during KUnit testing. The crash was traced back to the pidfs rhashtable conversion which replaced the 24-byte rb_node with an 8-byte rhash_head in struct pid, shrinking it from 160 to 144 bytes. struct kthread (without CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP) is also 144 bytes. With CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT and SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN both round up to 192 bytes and share the same slab cache. struct pid.rcu.func and struct kthread.affinity_node both sit at offset 0x78. When a kthread exits via make_task_dead() it bypasses kthread_exit() and misses the affinity_node cleanup. free_kthread_struct() frees the memory while the node is still linked into the global kthread_affinity_list. A subsequent list_del() by another kthread writes through dangling list pointers into the freed and reused memory, corrupting the pid's rcu.func pointer. Instead of patching free_kthread_struct() to handle the missed cleanup, consolidate all kthread exit paths. Turn kthread_exit() into a macro that calls do_exit() and add kthread_do_exit() which is called from do_exit() for any task with PF_KTHREAD set. This guarantees that kthread-specific cleanup always happens regardless of the exit path - make_task_dead(), direct do_exit(), or kthread_exit(). Replace __to_kthread() with a new tsk_is_kthread() accessor in the public header. Export do_exit() since module code using the kthread_exit() macro now needs it directly.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free Guillaume reported crashes via corrupted RCU callback function pointers during KUnit testing. The crash was traced back to the pidfs rhashtable conversion which replaced the 24-byte rb_node with an 8-byte rhash_head in struct pid, shrinking it from 160 to 144 bytes. struct kthread (without CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP) is also 144 bytes. With CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT and SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN both round up to 192 bytes and share the same slab cache. struct pid.rcu.func and struct kthread.affinity_node both sit at offset 0x78. When a kthread exits via make_task_dead() it bypasses kthread_exit() and misses the affinity_node cleanup. free_kthread_struct() frees the memory while the node is still linked into the global kthread_affinity_list. A subsequent list_del() by another kthread writes through dangling list pointers into the freed and reused memory, corrupting the pid's rcu.func pointer. Instead of patching free_kthread_struct() to handle the missed cleanup, consolidate all kthread exit paths. Turn kthread_exit() into a macro that calls do_exit() and add kthread_do_exit() which is called from do_exit() for any task with PF_KTHREAD set. This guarantees that kthread-specific cleanup always happens regardless of the exit path - make_task_dead(), direct do_exit(), or kthread_exit(). Replace __to_kthread() with a new tsk_is_kthread() accessor in the public header. Export do_exit() since module code using the kthread_exit() macro now needs it directly.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free Guillaume reported crashes via corrupted RCU callback function pointers during KUnit testing. The crash was traced back to the pidfs rhashtable conversion which replaced the 24-byte rb_node with an 8-byte rhash_head in struct pid, shrinking it from 160 to 144 bytes. struct kthread (without CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP) is also 144 bytes. With CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT and SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN both round up to 192 bytes and share the same slab cache. struct pid.rcu.func and struct kthread.affinity_node both sit at offset 0x78. When a kthread exits via make_task_dead() it bypasses kthread_exit() and misses the affinity_node cleanup. free_kthread_struct() frees the memory while the node is still linked into the global kthread_affinity_list. A subsequent list_del() by another kthread writes through dangling list pointers into the freed and reused memory, corrupting the pid's rcu.func pointer. Instead of patching free_kthread_struct() to handle the missed cleanup, consolidate all kthread exit paths. Turn kthread_exit() into a macro that calls do_exit() and add kthread_do_exit() which is called from do_exit() for any task with PF_KTHREAD set. This guarantees that kthread-specific cleanup always happens regardless of the exit path - make_task_dead(), direct do_exit(), or kthread_exit(). Replace __to_kthread() with a new tsk_is_kthread() accessor in the public header. Export do_exit() since module code using the kthread_exit() macro now needs it directly.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1454Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260513Security Bulletin 13 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 May 2026, published on 13 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43380 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43409 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43380 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43409 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0898Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43376 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45898 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43320 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43376 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43320 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43376 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43384 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43491 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-016893LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルでは、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。kthreadに関しては、use-after-freeを防ぐためにkthreadの終了パスを統合しました。Guillaume氏はKUnitテスト中に、破損したRCUコールバック関数ポインタによりクラッシュが発生したことを報告しました。そのクラッシュはpidfsのrhashtable変換に起因しており、24バイトのrb_nodeが構造体pid内で8バイトのrhash_headに置き換えられたため、160バイトから144バイトにサイズが縮小されました。CONFIG_BLK_CGROUPなしのstruct kthreadも144バイトになります。CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULTとSLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGNの設定により、両方とも192バイトに切り上げられ、同じスラブキャッシュを共有しています。struct pid.rcu.funcとstruct kthread.affinity_nodeは共にオフセット0x78に位置しています。kthreadがmake_task_dead()経由で終了するとkthread_exit()をバイパスし、affinity_nodeのクリーンアップを逃します。free_kthread_struct()はメモリを解放しますが、このノードはまだグローバルなkthread_affinity_listにリンクされたままになっています。別のkthreadによる後続のlist_del()が、解放され再利用されたメモリに対してダングリングリストポインタを書き込み、pidのrcu.funcポインタを破損させることがあります。free_kthread_struct()のパッチは未処理のクリーンアップに対応するものではなく、すべてのkthread終了パスを統合しました。kthread_exit()をdo_exit()を呼び出すマクロに変更し、PF_KTHREADフラグが設定されたタスクのdo_exit()から呼び出されるkthread_do_exit()を新たに追加しました。これにより、make_task_dead()、直接do_exit()、kthread_exit()のいずれの終了パスでもkthread固有のクリーンアップが必ず行われます。公開ヘッダでは__to_kthread()を新しいtsk_is_kthread()アクセサに置き換え、kthread_exit()マクロを使用するモジュールコードが必要とするため、do_exit()関数をエクスポートしています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 4d13f4304fa43471bfea101658a11feec7b28ac0 < 4729c7b00a347fd37d0cbc265b85f2884c3e06b6, 4d13f4304fa43471bfea101658a11feec7b28ac0 < 5a591d7a5e48d30100943940a30a6ab41b15c672, 4d13f4304fa43471bfea101658a11feec7b28ac0 < 28aaa9c39945b7925a1cc1d513c8f21ed38f5e4f, 6.14
Fixed
Linux: < 6.14, 6.18.19 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.9 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-28708
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43402 · cve.blacktree.nl