BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43359High confidence

btrfs: fix transaction abort on set received ioctl due to item overflow

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-28665

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix transaction abort on set received ioctl due to item overflow If the set received ioctl fails due to an item overflow when attempting to add the BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL we have to abort the transaction since we did some metadata updates before. This means that if a user calls this ioctl with the same received UUID field for a lot of subvolumes, we will hit the overflow, trigger the transaction abort and turn the filesystem into RO mode. A malicious user could exploit this, and this ioctl does not even requires that a user has admin privileges (CAP_SYS_ADMIN), only that he/she owns the subvolume. Fix this by doing an early check for item overflow before starting a transaction. This is also race safe because we are holding the subvol_sem semaphore in exclusive (write) mode. A test case for fstests will follow soon.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix transaction abort on set received ioctl due to item overflow If the set received ioctl fails due to an item overflow when attempting to add the BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL we have to abort the transaction since we did some metadata updates before. This means that if a user calls this ioctl with the same received UUID field for a lot of subvolumes, we will hit the overflow, trigger the transaction abort and turn the filesystem into RO mode. A malicious user could exploit this, and this ioctl does not even requires that a user has admin privileges (CAP_SYS_ADMIN), only that he/she owns the subvolume. Fix this by doing an early check for item overflow before starting a transaction. This is also race safe because we are holding the subvol_sem semaphore in exclusive (write) mode. A test case for fstests will follow soon.

Why

The product subtracts one value from another, such that the result is less than the minimum allowable integer value, which produces a value that is not equal to the correct result.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix transaction abort on set received ioctl due to item overflow If the set received ioctl fails due to an item overflow when attempting to add the BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL we have to abort the transaction since we did some metadata updates before. This means that if a user calls this ioctl with the same received UUID field for a lot of subvolumes, we will hit the overflow, trigger the transaction abort and turn the filesystem into RO mode. A malicious user could exploit this, and this ioctl does not even requires that a user has admin privileges (CAP_SYS_ADMIN), only that he/she owns the subvolume. Fix this by doing an early check for item overflow before starting a transaction. This is also race safe because we are holding the subvol_sem semaphore in exclusive (write) mode. A test case for fstests will follow soon.

Why

The product subtracts one value from another, such that the result is less than the minimum allowable integer value, which produces a value that is not equal to the correct result.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-191 ↗

CWE-191: Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound). The product subtracts one value from another, such that the result is less than the minimum allowable integer value, which produces a value that is not equal to the correct result.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-191
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1454Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43340 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43342 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43349 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43350 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43355 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43355 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43345 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43249 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0782Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43406 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43333 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43338 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43341 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43437 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-015840LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける整数アンダーフローの脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:btrfsのset received ioctlにおけるアイテムオーバーフローによるトランザクション中断の問題です。BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOLを追加しようとした際にアイテムオーバーフローでset received ioctlが失敗すると、以前にメタデータの更新が行われているためトランザクションを中断する必要がありました。これにより、ユーザーが多数のサブボリュームに対して同じ受信UUIDフィールドを使ってこのioctlを呼び出すと、オーバーフローが発生しトランザクションが中断され、ファイルシステムは読み取り専用モードになります。悪意のあるユーザーはこれを悪用でき、このioctlは管理者権限(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)を必要とせず、サブボリュームの所有権さえあれば実行可能です。この問題は、トランザクション開始前に早期にアイテムオーバーフローを確認することで修正されました。subvol_semセマフォを排他(書き込み)モードで保持しているため、競合状態も防止しています。fstests用のテストケースは近日中に提供予定です。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: dd5f9615fc5c5e8d3751aab3a17b92768fb1ce70 < b9914db13ac15aca3b74544c0bb1a2e0dad1f174, dd5f9615fc5c5e8d3751aab3a17b92768fb1ce70 < b19c0465e4daad5aa8f60552ea0578cf31a11b1e, dd5f9615fc5c5e8d3751aab3a17b92768fb1ce70 < 2e57b8cac2ba0d38aac76c1ecdfd8b899e3581a5, dd5f9615fc5c5e8d3751aab3a17b92768fb1ce70 < d11aefe654a04fc41996d254748d6a38b6b0a7be, dd5f9615fc5c5e8d3751aab3a17b92768fb1ce70 < 41fb97353ff58fa4f31904c343fc8e3df2f7517d, dd5f9615fc5c5e8d3751aab3a17b92768fb1ce70 < 87f2c46003fce4d739138aab4af1942b1afdadac, 3.12
Fixed
Linux: < 3.12, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.78 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.19 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.9 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 May 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:23 UTC · CWE-191 · Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-28665
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43359 · cve.blacktree.nl