BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43278High confidence

dm: clear cloned request bio pointer when last clone bio completes

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43278 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 9 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43278
47 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm: clear cloned request bio pointer when last clone bio completes Stale rq->bio values have been observed to cause double-initialization of cloned bios in request-based device-mapper targets, leading to use-after-free and double-free scenarios. One such case occurs when using dm-multipath on top of a PCIe NVMe namespace, where cloned request bios are freed during blk_complete_request(), but rq->bio is left intact. Subsequent clone teardown then attempts to free the same bios again via blk_rq_unprep_clone(). The resulting double-free path looks like: nvme_pci_complete_batch() nvme_complete_batch() blk_mq_end_request_batch() blk_complete_request() // called on a DM clone request bio_endio() // first free of all clone bios ... rq->end_io() // end_clone_request() dm_complete_request(tio->orig) dm_softirq_done() dm_done() dm_end_request() blk_rq_unprep_clone() // second free of clone bios Fix this by clearing the clone request's bio pointer when the last cloned bio completes, ensuring that later teardown paths do not attempt to free already-released bios.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27674

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm: clear cloned request bio pointer when last clone bio completes Stale rq->bio values have been observed to cause double-initialization of cloned bios in request-based device-mapper targets, leading to use-after-free and double-free scenarios. One such case occurs when using dm-multipath on top of a PCIe NVMe namespace, where cloned request bios are freed during blk_complete_request(), but rq->bio is left intact. Subsequent clone teardown then attempts to free the same bios again via blk_rq_unprep_clone(). The resulting double-free path looks like: nvme_pci_complete_batch() nvme_complete_batch() blk_mq_end_request_batch() blk_complete_request() // called on a DM clone request bio_endio() // first free of all clone bios ... rq->end_io() // end_clone_request() dm_complete_request(tio->orig) dm_softirq_done() dm_done() dm_end_request() blk_rq_unprep_clone() // second free of clone bios Fix this by clearing the clone request's bio pointer when the last cloned bio completes, ensuring that later teardown paths do not attempt to free already-released bios.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm: clear cloned request bio pointer when last clone bio completes Stale rq->bio values have been observed to cause double-initialization of cloned bios in request-based device-mapper targets, leading to use-after-free and double-free scenarios. One such case occurs when using dm-multipath on top of a PCIe NVMe namespace, where cloned request bios are freed during blk_complete_request(), but rq->bio is left intact. Subsequent clone teardown then attempts to free the same bios again via blk_rq_unprep_clone(). The resulting double-free path looks like: nvme_pci_complete_batch() nvme_complete_batch() blk_mq_end_request_batch() blk_complete_request() // called on a DM clone request bio_endio() // first free of all clone bios ... rq->end_io() // end_clone_request() dm_complete_request(tio->orig) dm_softirq_done() dm_done() dm_end_request() blk_rq_unprep_clone() // second free of clone bios Fix this by clearing the clone request's bio pointer when the last cloned bio completes, ensuring that later teardown paths do not attempt to free already-released bios.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm: clear cloned request bio pointer when last clone bio completes Stale rq->bio values have been observed to cause double-initialization of cloned bios in request-based device-mapper targets, leading to use-after-free and double-free scenarios. One such case occurs when using dm-multipath on top of a PCIe NVMe namespace, where cloned request bios are freed during blk_complete_request(), but rq->bio is left intact. Subsequent clone teardown then attempts to free the same bios again via blk_rq_unprep_clone(). The resulting double-free path looks like: nvme_pci_complete_batch() nvme_complete_batch() blk_mq_end_request_batch() blk_complete_request() // called on a DM clone request bio_endio() // first free of all clone bios ... rq->end_io() // end_clone_request() dm_complete_request(tio->orig) dm_softirq_done() dm_done() dm_end_request() blk_rq_unprep_clone() // second free of clone bios Fix this by clearing the clone request's bio pointer when the last cloned bio completes, ensuring that later teardown paths do not attempt to free already-released bios.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Double Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-415 ↗

CWE-415: Double Free. The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-415
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1405Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1202Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43416 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45897 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45968 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1164Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43416 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43416 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45897 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45968 Référence CVE CVE-2026-46037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43293 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43296 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43294 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43295 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43291 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014923LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける二重解放に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました：dmにおいて、最後のクローンされたbioが完了したときにクローンリクエストのbioポインタがクリアされない問題がありました。スタルなrq-bio値が存在すると、リクエストベースのデバイスマッパターゲットでクローンされたbioの二重初期化が発生し、その結果、use-after-freeや二重解放のシナリオが生じていました。例えば、PCIe NVMeネームスペース上でdm-multipathを使用している場合、blk_complete_request()でクローンされたリクエストbioが解放されますが、rq-bioはそのまま残ります。その後のクローンの解体処理がblk_rq_unprep_clone()を介して同じbioを再度解放しようとします。二重解放のパスは以下のとおりです：nvme_pci_complete_batch() → nvme_complete_batch() → blk_mq_end_request_batch() → blk_complete_request()（DMクローンリクエストに対して呼び出される）→ bio_endio()（すべてのクローンbioの最初の解放）→ rq-end_io()（end_clone_request()）→ dm_complete_request(tio-orig) → dm_softirq_done() → dm_done() → dm_end_request() → blk_rq_unprep_clone()（クローンbioの2回目の解放）。この問題は、最後のクローンされたbioが完了した際にクローンリクエストのbioポインタをクリアすることで修正され、後続の解体処理がすでに解放されたbioを再度解放しようとしないようにしています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.1, 6.1.165 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.128 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.75 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.16 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.6 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC · CWE-415 · Double Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27674
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27674↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43278 · cve.blacktree.nl