BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43266High confidence

EFI/CPER: don't go past the ARM processor CPER record buffer

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43266 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43266
230 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: EFI/CPER: don't go past the ARM processor CPER record buffer There's a logic inside GHES/CPER to detect if the section_length is too small, but it doesn't detect if it is too big. Currently, if the firmware receives an ARM processor CPER record stating that a section length is big, kernel will blindly trust section_length, producing a very long dump. For instance, a 67 bytes record with ERR_INFO_NUM set 46198 and section length set to 854918320 would dump a lot of data going a way past the firmware memory-mapped area. Fix it by adding a logic to prevent it to go past the buffer if ERR_INFO_NUM is too big, making it report instead: [Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware Error Source: 1 [Hardware Error]: event severity: recoverable [Hardware Error]: Error 0, type: recoverable [Hardware Error]: section_type: ARM processor error [Hardware Error]: MIDR: 0xff304b2f8476870a [Hardware Error]: section length: 854918320, CPER size: 67 [Hardware Error]: section length is too big [Hardware Error]: firmware-generated error record is incorrect [Hardware Error]: ERR_INFO_NUM is 46198 [ rjw: Subject and changelog tweaks ]
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27665

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: EFI/CPER: don't go past the ARM processor CPER record buffer There's a logic inside GHES/CPER to detect if the section_length is too small, but it doesn't detect if it is too big. Currently, if the firmware receives an ARM processor CPER record stating that a section length is big, kernel will blindly trust section_length, producing a very long dump. For instance, a 67 bytes record with ERR_INFO_NUM set 46198 and section length set to 854918320 would dump a lot of data going a way past the firmware memory-mapped area. Fix it by adding a logic to prevent it to go past the buffer if ERR_INFO_NUM is too big, making it report instead: [Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware Error Source: 1 [Hardware Error]: event severity: recoverable [Hardware Error]: Error 0, type: recoverable [Hardware Error]: section_type: ARM processor error [Hardware Error]: MIDR: 0xff304b2f8476870a [Hardware Error]: section length: 854918320, CPER size: 67 [Hardware Error]: section length is too big [Hardware Error]: firmware-generated error record is incorrect [Hardware Error]: ERR_INFO_NUM is 46198 [ rjw: Subject and changelog tweaks ]

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: EFI/CPER: don't go past the ARM processor CPER record buffer There's a logic inside GHES/CPER to detect if the section_length is too small, but it doesn't detect if it is too big. Currently, if the firmware receives an ARM processor CPER record stating that a section length is big, kernel will blindly trust section_length, producing a very long dump. For instance, a 67 bytes record with ERR_INFO_NUM set 46198 and section length set to 854918320 would dump a lot of data going a way past the firmware memory-mapped area. Fix it by adding a logic to prevent it to go past the buffer if ERR_INFO_NUM is too big, making it report instead: [Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware Error Source: 1 [Hardware Error]: event severity: recoverable [Hardware Error]: Error 0, type: recoverable [Hardware Error]: section_type: ARM processor error [Hardware Error]: MIDR: 0xff304b2f8476870a [Hardware Error]: section length: 854918320, CPER size: 67 [Hardware Error]: section length is too big [Hardware Error]: firmware-generated error record is incorrect [Hardware Error]: ERR_INFO_NUM is 46198 [ rjw: Subject and changelog tweaks ]

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: EFI/CPER: don't go past the ARM processor CPER record buffer There's a logic inside GHES/CPER to detect if the section_length is too small, but it doesn't detect if it is too big. Currently, if the firmware receives an ARM processor CPER record stating that a section length is big, kernel will blindly trust section_length, producing a very long dump. For instance, a 67 bytes record with ERR_INFO_NUM set 46198 and section length set to 854918320 would dump a lot of data going a way past the firmware memory-mapped area. Fix it by adding a logic to prevent it to go past the buffer if ERR_INFO_NUM is too big, making it report instead: [Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware Error Source: 1 [Hardware Error]: event severity: recoverable [Hardware Error]: Error 0, type: recoverable [Hardware Error]: section_type: ARM processor error [Hardware Error]: MIDR: 0xff304b2f8476870a [Hardware Error]: section length: 854918320, CPER size: 67 [Hardware Error]: section length is too big [Hardware Error]: firmware-generated error record is incorrect [Hardware Error]: ERR_INFO_NUM is 46198 [ rjw: Subject and changelog tweaks ]

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1405Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1091Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43170 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43172 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43250 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1029Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43309 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43279 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43287 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014935LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、EFI/CPERでARMプロセッサのCPERレコードバッファを超えないように修正が行われました。GHES/CPER内部にはsection_lengthが小さすぎるかどうかを検出するロジックがありますが、大きすぎるかどうかの検出はありません。ファームウェアがARMプロセッサのCPERレコードでセクション長が大きいと通知した場合、カーネルはsection_lengthを盲目的に信頼し、非常に長いダンプを生成してしまいます。この問題には、ERR_INFO_NUMが大きすぎる場合にバッファを超えないようにするロジックを追加して対応しました。これにより、不正なファームウェアのエラーレコードに対してはセクション長が大きすぎると報告し、安全に処理されます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.13, 5.10.252 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.202 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.165 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.128 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.75 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.16 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.6 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:21 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27665
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43266 · cve.blacktree.nl