BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43265High confidence

KVM: x86: Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events from vcpu_block()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27662

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events from vcpu_block() Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events after exiting a blocking state while L2 is active, as exiting to userspace will generate a spurious userspace exit, usually with KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN, and likely lead to the VM's demise. Continuing with the wakeup isn't perfect either, as *something* has gone sideways if a vCPU is awakened in L2 with an injected event (or worse, a nested run pending), but continuing on gives the VM a decent chance of surviving without any major side effects. As explained in the Fixes commits, it _should_ be impossible for a vCPU to be put into a blocking state with an already-injected event (exception, IRQ, or NMI). Unfortunately, userspace can stuff MP_STATE and/or injected events, and thus put the vCPU into what should be an impossible state. Don't bother trying to preserve the WARN, e.g. with an anti-syzkaller Kconfig, as WARNs can (hopefully) be added in paths where _KVM_ would be violating x86 architecture, e.g. by WARNing if KVM attempts to inject an exception or interrupt while the vCPU isn't running.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events from vcpu_block() Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events after exiting a blocking state while L2 is active, as exiting to userspace will generate a spurious userspace exit, usually with KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN, and likely lead to the VM's demise. Continuing with the wakeup isn't perfect either, as *something* has gone sideways if a vCPU is awakened in L2 with an injected event (or worse, a nested run pending), but continuing on gives the VM a decent chance of surviving without any major side effects. As explained in the Fixes commits, it _should_ be impossible for a vCPU to be put into a blocking state with an already-injected event (exception, IRQ, or NMI). Unfortunately, userspace can stuff MP_STATE and/or injected events, and thus put the vCPU into what should be an impossible state. Don't bother trying to preserve the WARN, e.g. with an anti-syzkaller Kconfig, as WARNs can (hopefully) be added in paths where _KVM_ would be violating x86 architecture, e.g. by WARNing if KVM attempts to inject an exception or interrupt while the vCPU isn't running.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events from vcpu_block() Ignore -EBUSY when checking nested events after exiting a blocking state while L2 is active, as exiting to userspace will generate a spurious userspace exit, usually with KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN, and likely lead to the VM's demise. Continuing with the wakeup isn't perfect either, as *something* has gone sideways if a vCPU is awakened in L2 with an injected event (or worse, a nested run pending), but continuing on gives the VM a decent chance of surviving without any major side effects. As explained in the Fixes commits, it _should_ be impossible for a vCPU to be put into a blocking state with an already-injected event (exception, IRQ, or NMI). Unfortunately, userspace can stuff MP_STATE and/or injected events, and thus put the vCPU into what should be an impossible state. Don't bother trying to preserve the WARN, e.g. with an anti-syzkaller Kconfig, as WARNs can (hopefully) be added in paths where _KVM_ would be violating x86 architecture, e.g. by WARNing if KVM attempts to inject an exception or interrupt while the vCPU isn't running.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1405Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43324 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43328 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43330 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43271 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43275 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43277 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43153 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43329 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43330 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43366 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43437 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014936LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。KVMのx86アーキテクチャにおいて、vcpu_block()からのネストされたイベントをチェックする際に-EBUSYエラーを無視していました。L2がアクティブな間にブロッキング状態から抜けた後のネストされたイベントを確認する際にも同様に-EBUSYを無視していました。この問題は、ユーザースペースへの退出が偽のユーザースペース退出(通常はKVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN)を生成し、VMの異常終了を引き起こす可能性があるため発生します。ウェイクアップ状態を続けることも完全な解決策ではありません。なぜなら、vCPUが注入されたイベント(あるいはさらに悪いことにネストされた実行保留状態)とともにL2でウェイクアップされた場合には問題が発生しますが、それでも続行することでVMは重大な副作用なしに動作を維持する可能性がかなり高まるからです。修正コミットで説明されている通り、vCPUがすでに例外、IRQ、またはNMIなどの注入イベントを持った状態でブロッキング状態に入ることは不可能であるはずです。しかし、ユーザースペースがMP_STATEや注入イベントを不適切に設定することで、本来は不可能な状態にvCPUを置くことがあります。WARNを保持しようとせず、例えばanti-syzkaller Kconfigなどを使用しないことが推奨されます。WARNは、vCPUが実行中でないときに例外や割り込みを注入しようとするなど、x86アーキテクチャに違反するKVMの動作を検出するために追加される可能性があるからです。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 26844fee6adee9b1557d2279b0506285de9ee82b < 78265cd066d73a5cb41c088fcae4a2515e480d97, 26844fee6adee9b1557d2279b0506285de9ee82b < ec3be7dc9391085a2d96700e159d66d1328b7ff6, 26844fee6adee9b1557d2279b0506285de9ee82b < 2657439265d34a911886b916ba8be97ecc117d51, 26844fee6adee9b1557d2279b0506285de9ee82b < 1e88b5f854bdb469424132e0bb44793ad7a7c20a, 26844fee6adee9b1557d2279b0506285de9ee82b < 1c957773063ed3264953597e32990a748381caf6, 26844fee6adee9b1557d2279b0506285de9ee82b < ead63640d4e72e6f6d464f4e31f7fecb79af8869, 6.1
Fixed
Linux: < 6.1, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.77 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.17 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.6 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:21 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27662
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43265 · cve.blacktree.nl