BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43244High confidence

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43244 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43244
266 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error Syzkaller reported a warning in kcm_write_msgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list. When kcm_sendmsg() fills MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments in the current skb, it allocates a new skb (tskb) and links it into the frag_list before copying data. If the copy subsequently fails (e.g. -EFAULT from user memory), tskb remains in the frag_list with zero fragments: head skb (msg being assembled, NOT yet in sk_write_queue) +-----------+ | frags[17] | (MAX_SKB_FRAGS, all filled with data) | frag_list-+--> tskb +-----------+ +----------+ | frags[0] | (empty! copy failed before filling) +----------+ For SOCK_SEQPACKET with partial data already copied, the error path saves this message via partial_message for later completion. For SOCK_SEQPACKET, sock_write_iter() automatically sets MSG_EOR, so a subsequent zero-length write(fd, NULL, 0) completes the message and queues it to sk_write_queue. kcm_write_msgs() then walks the frag_list and hits: WARN_ON(!skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags) TCP has a similar pattern where skbs are enqueued before data copy and cleaned up on failure via tcp_remove_empty_skb(). KCM was missing the equivalent cleanup. Fix this by tracking the predecessor skb (frag_prev) when allocating a new frag_list entry. On error, if the tail skb has zero frags, use frag_prev to unlink and free it in O(1) without walking the singly-linked frag_list. frag_prev is safe to dereference because the entire message chain is only held locally (or in kcm->seq_skb) and is not added to sk_write_queue until MSG_EOR, so the send path cannot free it underneath us. Also change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid flooding the log if the condition is somehow hit repeatedly. There are currently no KCM selftests in the kernel tree; a simple reproducer is available at [1]. [1] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/a94d431c757e8d6f168f4dd1a3749daa
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27807

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error Syzkaller reported a warning in kcm_write_msgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list. When kcm_sendmsg() fills MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments in the current skb, it allocates a new skb (tskb) and links it into the frag_list before copying data. If the copy subsequently fails (e.g. -EFAULT from user memory), tskb remains in the frag_list with zero fragments: head skb (msg being assembled, NOT yet in sk_write_queue) +-----------+ | frags[17] | (MAX_SKB_FRAGS, all filled with data) | frag_list-+--> tskb +-----------+ +----------+ | frags[0] | (empty! copy failed before filling) +----------+ For SOCK_SEQPACKET with partial data already copied, the error path saves this message via partial_message for later completion. For SOCK_SEQPACKET, sock_write_iter() automatically sets MSG_EOR, so a subsequent zero-length write(fd, NULL, 0) completes the message and queues it to sk_write_queue. kcm_write_msgs() then walks the frag_list and hits: WARN_ON(!skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags) TCP has a similar pattern where skbs are enqueued before data copy and cleaned up on failure via tcp_remove_empty_skb(). KCM was missing the equivalent cleanup. Fix this by tracking the predecessor skb (frag_prev) when allocating a new frag_list entry. On error, if the tail skb has zero frags, use frag_prev to unlink and free it in O(1) without walking the singly-linked frag_list. frag_prev is safe to dereference because the entire message chain is only held locally (or in kcm->seq_skb) and is not added to sk_write_queue until MSG_EOR, so the send path cannot free it underneath us. Also change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid flooding the log if the condition is somehow hit repeatedly. There are currently no KCM selftests in the kernel tree; a simple reproducer is available at [1]. [1] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/a94d431c757e8d6f168f4dd1a3749daa

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error Syzkaller reported a warning in kcm_write_msgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list. When kcm_sendmsg() fills MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments in the current skb, it allocates a new skb (tskb) and links it into the frag_list before copying data. If the copy subsequently fails (e.g. -EFAULT from user memory), tskb remains in the frag_list with zero fragments: head skb (msg being assembled, NOT yet in sk_write_queue) +-----------+ | frags[17] | (MAX_SKB_FRAGS, all filled with data) | frag_list-+--> tskb +-----------+ +----------+ | frags[0] | (empty! copy failed before filling) +----------+ For SOCK_SEQPACKET with partial data already copied, the error path saves this message via partial_message for later completion. For SOCK_SEQPACKET, sock_write_iter() automatically sets MSG_EOR, so a subsequent zero-length write(fd, NULL, 0) completes the message and queues it to sk_write_queue. kcm_write_msgs() then walks the frag_list and hits: WARN_ON(!skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags) TCP has a similar pattern where skbs are enqueued before data copy and cleaned up on failure via tcp_remove_empty_skb(). KCM was missing the equivalent cleanup. Fix this by tracking the predecessor skb (frag_prev) when allocating a new frag_list entry. On error, if the tail skb has zero frags, use frag_prev to unlink and free it in O(1) without walking the singly-linked frag_list. frag_prev is safe to dereference because the entire message chain is only held locally (or in kcm->seq_skb) and is not added to sk_write_queue until MSG_EOR, so the send path cannot free it underneath us. Also change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid flooding the log if the condition is somehow hit repeatedly. There are currently no KCM selftests in the kernel tree; a simple reproducer is available at [1]. [1] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/a94d431c757e8d6f168f4dd1a3749daa

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error Syzkaller reported a warning in kcm_write_msgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list. When kcm_sendmsg() fills MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments in the current skb, it allocates a new skb (tskb) and links it into the frag_list before copying data. If the copy subsequently fails (e.g. -EFAULT from user memory), tskb remains in the frag_list with zero fragments: head skb (msg being assembled, NOT yet in sk_write_queue) +-----------+ | frags[17] | (MAX_SKB_FRAGS, all filled with data) | frag_list-+--> tskb +-----------+ +----------+ | frags[0] | (empty! copy failed before filling) +----------+ For SOCK_SEQPACKET with partial data already copied, the error path saves this message via partial_message for later completion. For SOCK_SEQPACKET, sock_write_iter() automatically sets MSG_EOR, so a subsequent zero-length write(fd, NULL, 0) completes the message and queues it to sk_write_queue. kcm_write_msgs() then walks the frag_list and hits: WARN_ON(!skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags) TCP has a similar pattern where skbs are enqueued before data copy and cleaned up on failure via tcp_remove_empty_skb(). KCM was missing the equivalent cleanup. Fix this by tracking the predecessor skb (frag_prev) when allocating a new frag_list entry. On error, if the tail skb has zero frags, use frag_prev to unlink and free it in O(1) without walking the singly-linked frag_list. frag_prev is safe to dereference because the entire message chain is only held locally (or in kcm->seq_skb) and is not added to sk_write_queue until MSG_EOR, so the send path cannot free it underneath us. Also change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid flooding the log if the condition is somehow hit repeatedly. There are currently no KCM selftests in the kernel tree; a simple reproducer is available at [1]. [1] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/a94d431c757e8d6f168f4dd1a3749daa

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1405Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43229 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43249 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43250 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1029Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43248 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43249 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43250 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43248 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43248 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43249 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43250 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43246 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43248 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43249 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43250 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43251 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-015109LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、kcm: 部分的なsendmsgエラー時にfrag_list内のゼロフラグメントskbを修正する脆弱性が修正されました。Syzkallerはfrag_list内にゼロフラグメントskbを含むメッセージを処理する際、kcm_write_msgs()で警告を報告していました。kcm_sendmsg()は現在のskbにMAX_SKB_FRAGSフラグメントを埋めると、新しいskb（tskb）を割り当ててデータコピー前にfrag_listに接続します。コピーが失敗した場合（例：ユーザーメモリからの-EFAULT）には、tskbはゼロフラグメントのままfrag_list内に残ります。SOCK_SEQPACKETでは部分データが既にコピーされている場合、エラー経路はこのメッセージをpartial_messageとして後に保存します。SOCK_SEQPACKETはsock_write_iter()が自動的にMSG_EORを設定するため、続くゼロ長書き込み(fd, NULL, 0)でメッセージを完了させ、sk_write_queueにキューイングします。kcm_write_msgs()はfrag_listを辿る際にWARN_ON(!skb_shinfo(skb)-nr_frags)を発生させました。TCPでは類似のクリーンアップが存在しますが、KCMにはこれが欠如していました。修正では、新規frag_listエントリ割当時に先行skb（frag_prev）を追跡し、エラー発生時に末尾skbがゼロフラグメントであればfrag_prevを使ってfrag_listから高速に解除・解放します。この処理は安定しており、条件が繰り返される場合のログ流出を防ぐためにWARN_ONはWARN_ON_ONCEに変更されました。この修正により問題は解決しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.6, 6.12.75 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.16 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.6 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:20 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27807
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27807↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43244 · cve.blacktree.nl