BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43227High confidence

clocksource/drivers/sh_tmu: Always leave device running after probe

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27788

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: clocksource/drivers/sh_tmu: Always leave device running after probe The TMU device can be used as both a clocksource and a clockevent provider. The driver tries to be smart and power itself on and off, as well as enabling and disabling its clock when it's not in operation. This behavior is slightly altered if the TMU is used as an early platform device in which case the device is left powered on after probe, but the clock is still enabled and disabled at runtime. This has worked for a long time, but recent improvements in PREEMPT_RT and PROVE_LOCKING have highlighted an issue. As the TMU registers itself as a clockevent provider, clockevents_register_device(), it needs to use raw spinlocks internally as this is the context of which the clockevent framework interacts with the TMU driver. However in the context of holding a raw spinlock the TMU driver can't really manage its power state or clock with calls to pm_runtime_*() and clk_*() as these calls end up in other platform drivers using regular spinlocks to control power and clocks. This mix of spinlock contexts trips a lockdep warning. ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 Not tainted ----------------------------- swapper/0/0 is trying to lock: ffff000008c9e180 (&dev->power.lock){-...}-{3:3}, at: __pm_runtime_resume+0x38/0x88 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by swapper/0/0: ccree e6601000.crypto: ARM CryptoCell 630P Driver: HW version 0xAF400001/0xDCC63000, Driver version 5.0 #0: ffff8000817ec298 ccree e6601000.crypto: ARM ccree device initialized (tick_broadcast_lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0xa4/0x3a8 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 PREEMPT Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT) Call trace: show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C) dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90 dump_stack+0x14/0x1c __lock_acquire+0x904/0x1584 lock_acquire+0x220/0x34c _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x80 __pm_runtime_resume+0x38/0x88 sh_tmu_clock_event_set_oneshot+0x84/0xd4 clockevents_switch_state+0xfc/0x13c tick_broadcast_set_event+0x30/0xa4 __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x1e0/0x3a8 tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x30/0x40 cpuidle_enter_state+0x40c/0x680 cpuidle_enter+0x30/0x40 do_idle+0x1f4/0x280 cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40 kernel_init+0x0/0x130 do_one_initcall+0x0/0x230 __primary_switched+0x88/0x90 For non-PREEMPT_RT builds this is not really an issue, but for PREEMPT_RT builds where normal spinlocks can sleep this might be an issue. Be cautious and always leave the power and clock running after probe.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: clocksource/drivers/sh_tmu: Always leave device running after probe The TMU device can be used as both a clocksource and a clockevent provider. The driver tries to be smart and power itself on and off, as well as enabling and disabling its clock when it's not in operation. This behavior is slightly altered if the TMU is used as an early platform device in which case the device is left powered on after probe, but the clock is still enabled and disabled at runtime. This has worked for a long time, but recent improvements in PREEMPT_RT and PROVE_LOCKING have highlighted an issue. As the TMU registers itself as a clockevent provider, clockevents_register_device(), it needs to use raw spinlocks internally as this is the context of which the clockevent framework interacts with the TMU driver. However in the context of holding a raw spinlock the TMU driver can't really manage its power state or clock with calls to pm_runtime_*() and clk_*() as these calls end up in other platform drivers using regular spinlocks to control power and clocks. This mix of spinlock contexts trips a lockdep warning. ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 Not tainted ----------------------------- swapper/0/0 is trying to lock: ffff000008c9e180 (&dev->power.lock){-...}-{3:3}, at: __pm_runtime_resume+0x38/0x88 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by swapper/0/0: ccree e6601000.crypto: ARM CryptoCell 630P Driver: HW version 0xAF400001/0xDCC63000, Driver version 5.0 #0: ffff8000817ec298 ccree e6601000.crypto: ARM ccree device initialized (tick_broadcast_lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0xa4/0x3a8 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 PREEMPT Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT) Call trace: show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C) dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90 dump_stack+0x14/0x1c __lock_acquire+0x904/0x1584 lock_acquire+0x220/0x34c _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x80 __pm_runtime_resume+0x38/0x88 sh_tmu_clock_event_set_oneshot+0x84/0xd4 clockevents_switch_state+0xfc/0x13c tick_broadcast_set_event+0x30/0xa4 __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x1e0/0x3a8 tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x30/0x40 cpuidle_enter_state+0x40c/0x680 cpuidle_enter+0x30/0x40 do_idle+0x1f4/0x280 cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40 kernel_init+0x0/0x130 do_one_initcall+0x0/0x230 __primary_switched+0x88/0x90 For non-PREEMPT_RT builds this is not really an issue, but for PREEMPT_RT builds where normal spinlocks can sleep this might be an issue. Be cautious and always leave the power and clock running after probe.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: clocksource/drivers/sh_tmu: Always leave device running after probe The TMU device can be used as both a clocksource and a clockevent provider. The driver tries to be smart and power itself on and off, as well as enabling and disabling its clock when it's not in operation. This behavior is slightly altered if the TMU is used as an early platform device in which case the device is left powered on after probe, but the clock is still enabled and disabled at runtime. This has worked for a long time, but recent improvements in PREEMPT_RT and PROVE_LOCKING have highlighted an issue. As the TMU registers itself as a clockevent provider, clockevents_register_device(), it needs to use raw spinlocks internally as this is the context of which the clockevent framework interacts with the TMU driver. However in the context of holding a raw spinlock the TMU driver can't really manage its power state or clock with calls to pm_runtime_*() and clk_*() as these calls end up in other platform drivers using regular spinlocks to control power and clocks. This mix of spinlock contexts trips a lockdep warning. ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 Not tainted ----------------------------- swapper/0/0 is trying to lock: ffff000008c9e180 (&dev->power.lock){-...}-{3:3}, at: __pm_runtime_resume+0x38/0x88 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 1 lock held by swapper/0/0: ccree e6601000.crypto: ARM CryptoCell 630P Driver: HW version 0xAF400001/0xDCC63000, Driver version 5.0 #0: ffff8000817ec298 ccree e6601000.crypto: ARM ccree device initialized (tick_broadcast_lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0xa4/0x3a8 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 PREEMPT Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT) Call trace: show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C) dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90 dump_stack+0x14/0x1c __lock_acquire+0x904/0x1584 lock_acquire+0x220/0x34c _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x80 __pm_runtime_resume+0x38/0x88 sh_tmu_clock_event_set_oneshot+0x84/0xd4 clockevents_switch_state+0xfc/0x13c tick_broadcast_set_event+0x30/0xa4 __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x1e0/0x3a8 tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x30/0x40 cpuidle_enter_state+0x40c/0x680 cpuidle_enter+0x30/0x40 do_idle+0x1f4/0x280 cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40 kernel_init+0x0/0x130 do_one_initcall+0x0/0x230 __primary_switched+0x88/0x90 For non-PREEMPT_RT builds this is not really an issue, but for PREEMPT_RT builds where normal spinlocks can sleep this might be an issue. Be cautious and always leave the power and clock running after probe.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1405Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43212 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43212 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43212 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014947LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。clocksource/drivers/sh_tmuにおいて、probe後に常にデバイスを稼働状態に保つ問題です。TMUデバイスはクロックソースおよびクロックイベントプロバイダーの両方として使用されます。ドライバーは正常に動作し、動作していないときは自身の電源をオン・オフし、クロックも有効・無効にします。この動作はTMUが初期プラットフォームデバイスとして使われる場合にわずかに変更され、probe後もデバイスは電源オンのままですが、クロックはランタイムで有効化・無効化されます。この動作は長年にわたり機能してきましたが、最近のPREEMPT_RTおよびPROVE_LOCKINGの改善により問題が顕著になりました。TMUはclockevents_register_device()によってクロックイベントプロバイダーとして登録されるため、クロックイベントフレームワークがTMUドライバーとやり取りする際のコンテキストとして生のスピンロック(raw spinlock)を内部的に使用する必要があります。しかし、生のスピンロックを保持中は、TMUドライバーはpm_runtime_*()やclk_*()呼び出しで電力状態やクロックを管理できません。これらの呼び出しは通常のスピンロックを使う他のプラットフォームドライバーに渡り、電力とクロックを制御するため、このスピンロックコンテキストの混在がlockdep警告を引き起こします。以下のような警告が発生しました。============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.18.0-arm64-renesas-09926-gee959e7c5e34 #1 Taintedなし ----------------------------- swapper/0/0がロックを取得しようとしています。その他のデバッグ情報は省略します。非PREEMPT_RTビルドでは問題になりませんが、PREEMPT_RTビルドで通常スピンロックがスリープ可能な場合に問題となる可能性があります。したがって、probe後は常に電力とクロックを稼働状態のまま維持することが推奨されています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 9570ef20423b549757aa484ad388f9a7d5bdc4d9 < 79d650695773f03de36b99228a090d33d1c18264, 9570ef20423b549757aa484ad388f9a7d5bdc4d9 < f0b31247e7d67a943b3a09d3cef7c0ae788d88e6, 9570ef20423b549757aa484ad388f9a7d5bdc4d9 < 016476afef993d1201a19decc9b5b2ea1e6620f2, 9570ef20423b549757aa484ad388f9a7d5bdc4d9 < 6f113ab549b864c1bc57d4f89846ee335394089a, 9570ef20423b549757aa484ad388f9a7d5bdc4d9 < 88c76792180dffd83f1c5b9dc8fdaeb145cb94e0, 9570ef20423b549757aa484ad388f9a7d5bdc4d9 < bc59d5f3afe41fec5d673c27c703b761ae578d28, 9570ef20423b549757aa484ad388f9a7d5bdc4d9 < 0e513cc6b9cea190fe342cc222b1054e7e8acfc8, 9570ef20423b549757aa484ad388f9a7d5bdc4d9 < b1278972b08e480990e2789bdc6a7c918bc349be, 2.6.31
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.31, 5.10.252 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.202 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.165 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.128 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.75 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.16 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.6 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:20 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27788
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43227 · cve.blacktree.nl