BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43226High confidence

net/rds: No shortcut out of RDS_CONN_ERROR

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.72% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43226 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43226
266 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: No shortcut out of RDS_CONN_ERROR RDS connections carry a state "rds_conn_path::cp_state" and transitions from one state to another and are conditional upon an expected state: "rds_conn_path_transition." There is one exception to this conditionality, which is "RDS_CONN_ERROR" that can be enforced by "rds_conn_path_drop" regardless of what state the condition is currently in. But as soon as a connection enters state "RDS_CONN_ERROR", the connection handling code expects it to go through the shutdown-path. The RDS/TCP multipath changes added a shortcut out of "RDS_CONN_ERROR" straight back to "RDS_CONN_CONNECTING" via "rds_tcp_accept_one_path" (e.g. after "rds_tcp_state_change"). A subsequent "rds_tcp_reset_callbacks" can then transition the state to "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" with a shutdown-worker queued. That'll trip up "rds_conn_init_shutdown", which was never adjusted to handle "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" and subsequently drops the connection with the dreaded "DR_INV_CONN_STATE", which leaves "RDS_SHUTDOWN_WORK_QUEUED" on forever. So we do two things here: a) Don't shortcut "RDS_CONN_ERROR", but take the longer path through the shutdown code. b) Add "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" to the expected states in "rds_conn_init_shutdown" so that we won't error out and get stuck, if we ever hit weird state transitions like this again."
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27789

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: No shortcut out of RDS_CONN_ERROR RDS connections carry a state "rds_conn_path::cp_state" and transitions from one state to another and are conditional upon an expected state: "rds_conn_path_transition." There is one exception to this conditionality, which is "RDS_CONN_ERROR" that can be enforced by "rds_conn_path_drop" regardless of what state the condition is currently in. But as soon as a connection enters state "RDS_CONN_ERROR", the connection handling code expects it to go through the shutdown-path. The RDS/TCP multipath changes added a shortcut out of "RDS_CONN_ERROR" straight back to "RDS_CONN_CONNECTING" via "rds_tcp_accept_one_path" (e.g. after "rds_tcp_state_change"). A subsequent "rds_tcp_reset_callbacks" can then transition the state to "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" with a shutdown-worker queued. That'll trip up "rds_conn_init_shutdown", which was never adjusted to handle "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" and subsequently drops the connection with the dreaded "DR_INV_CONN_STATE", which leaves "RDS_SHUTDOWN_WORK_QUEUED" on forever. So we do two things here: a) Don't shortcut "RDS_CONN_ERROR", but take the longer path through the shutdown code. b) Add "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" to the expected states in "rds_conn_init_shutdown" so that we won't error out and get stuck, if we ever hit weird state transitions like this again."

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: No shortcut out of RDS_CONN_ERROR RDS connections carry a state "rds_conn_path::cp_state" and transitions from one state to another and are conditional upon an expected state: "rds_conn_path_transition." There is one exception to this conditionality, which is "RDS_CONN_ERROR" that can be enforced by "rds_conn_path_drop" regardless of what state the condition is currently in. But as soon as a connection enters state "RDS_CONN_ERROR", the connection handling code expects it to go through the shutdown-path. The RDS/TCP multipath changes added a shortcut out of "RDS_CONN_ERROR" straight back to "RDS_CONN_CONNECTING" via "rds_tcp_accept_one_path" (e.g. after "rds_tcp_state_change"). A subsequent "rds_tcp_reset_callbacks" can then transition the state to "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" with a shutdown-worker queued. That'll trip up "rds_conn_init_shutdown", which was never adjusted to handle "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" and subsequently drops the connection with the dreaded "DR_INV_CONN_STATE", which leaves "RDS_SHUTDOWN_WORK_QUEUED" on forever. So we do two things here: a) Don't shortcut "RDS_CONN_ERROR", but take the longer path through the shutdown code. b) Add "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" to the expected states in "rds_conn_init_shutdown" so that we won't error out and get stuck, if we ever hit weird state transitions like this again."

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: No shortcut out of RDS_CONN_ERROR RDS connections carry a state "rds_conn_path::cp_state" and transitions from one state to another and are conditional upon an expected state: "rds_conn_path_transition." There is one exception to this conditionality, which is "RDS_CONN_ERROR" that can be enforced by "rds_conn_path_drop" regardless of what state the condition is currently in. But as soon as a connection enters state "RDS_CONN_ERROR", the connection handling code expects it to go through the shutdown-path. The RDS/TCP multipath changes added a shortcut out of "RDS_CONN_ERROR" straight back to "RDS_CONN_CONNECTING" via "rds_tcp_accept_one_path" (e.g. after "rds_tcp_state_change"). A subsequent "rds_tcp_reset_callbacks" can then transition the state to "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" with a shutdown-worker queued. That'll trip up "rds_conn_init_shutdown", which was never adjusted to handle "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" and subsequently drops the connection with the dreaded "DR_INV_CONN_STATE", which leaves "RDS_SHUTDOWN_WORK_QUEUED" on forever. So we do two things here: a) Don't shortcut "RDS_CONN_ERROR", but take the longer path through the shutdown code. b) Add "RDS_CONN_RESETTING" to the expected states in "rds_conn_init_shutdown" so that we won't error out and get stuck, if we ever hit weird state transitions like this again."

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1405Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1029Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43248 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43253 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43283 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43212 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43212 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43212 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43215 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43225 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43238 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43218 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43223 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43230 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43232 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43241 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014948LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。net/rdsでは、RDS_CONN_ERRORからのショートカットが存在しません。RDS接続は状態「rds_conn_path::cp_state」を持ち、状態間の遷移は期待される状態「rds_conn_path_transition」に基づいて条件付きで行われます。ただし、この条件には例外があり、「RDS_CONN_ERROR」は現在の状態に関係なく「rds_conn_path_drop」によって強制されます。しかし、接続が「RDS_CONN_ERROR」状態になると、接続処理コードはシャットダウン経路を通ることを期待します。RDS/TCPマルチパスの変更により、「rds_tcp_accept_one_path」(例:「rds_tcp_state_change」の後)を介して「RDS_CONN_ERROR」から直接「RDS_CONN_CONNECTING」へのショートカットが追加されました。その後、「rds_tcp_reset_callbacks」によって状態が「RDS_CONN_RESETTING」に遷移し、シャットダウンワーカーがキューに入れられます。これにより、「rds_conn_init_shutdown」が「RDS_CONN_RESETTING」を処理するよう調整されていなかったため誤動作し、「DR_INV_CONN_STATE」のエラーで接続を切断し、「RDS_SHUTDOWN_WORK_QUEUED」が永続してしまいます。対策として、(a)「RDS_CONN_ERROR」からのショートカットを行わず、シャットダウンコードを通る長い経路を採用しました。(b)「rds_conn_init_shutdown」で期待される状態に「RDS_CONN_RESETTING」を追加し、このような異常な状態遷移が再発してもエラーにならずにハングアップしないようにしました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.8, 5.10.252 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.202 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.165 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.128 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.75 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.16 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.6 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27789
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43226 · cve.blacktree.nl