BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43194High confidence

net: consume xmit errors of GSO frames

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.76% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43194 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 15 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43194
322 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: consume xmit errors of GSO frames udpgro_frglist.sh and udpgro_bench.sh are the flakiest tests currently in NIPA. They fail in the same exact way, TCP GRO test stalls occasionally and the test gets killed after 10min. These tests use veth to simulate GRO. They attach a trivial ("return XDP_PASS;") XDP program to the veth to force TSO off and NAPI on. Digging into the failure mode we can see that the connection is completely stuck after a burst of drops. The sender's snd_nxt is at sequence number N [1], but the receiver claims to have received (rcv_nxt) up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. Last piece of the puzzle is that senders rtx queue is not empty (let's say the block in the rtx queue is at sequence number N - 4 * MSS [3]). In this state, sender sends a retransmission from the rtx queue with a single segment, and sequence numbers N-4*MSS:N-3*MSS [3]. Receiver sees it and responds with an ACK all the way up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. But sender will reject this ack as TCP_ACK_UNSENT_DATA because it has no recollection of ever sending data that far out [1]. And we are stuck. The root cause is the mess of the xmit return codes. veth returns an error when it can't xmit a frame. We end up with a loss event like this: ------------------------------------------------- | GSO super frame 1 | GSO super frame 2 | |-----------------------------------------------| | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ------------------------------------------------- x ok ok | ok ok ok \\ snd_nxt "x" means packet lost by veth, and "ok" means it went thru. Since veth has TSO disabled in this test it sees individual segments. Segment 1 is on the retransmit queue and will be resent. So why did the sender not advance snd_nxt even tho it clearly did send up to seg 8? tcp_write_xmit() interprets the return code from the core to mean that data has not been sent at all. Since TCP deals with GSO super frames, not individual segment the crux of the problem is that loss of a single segment can be interpreted as loss of all. TCP only sees the last return code for the last segment of the GSO frame (in <> brackets in the diagram above). Of course for the problem to occur we need a setup or a device without a Qdisc. Otherwise Qdisc layer disconnects the protocol layer from the device errors completely. We have multiple ways to fix this. 1) make veth not return an error when it lost a packet. While this is what I think we did in the past, the issue keeps reappearing and it's annoying to debug. The game of whack a mole is not great. 2) fix the damn return codes We only talk about NETDEV_TX_OK and NETDEV_TX_BUSY in the documentation, so maybe we should make the return code from ndo_start_xmit() a boolean. I like that the most, but perhaps some ancient, not-really-networking protocol would suffer. 3) make TCP ignore the errors It is not entirely clear to me what benefit TCP gets from interpreting the result of ip_queue_xmit()? Specifically once the connection is established and we're pushing data - packet loss is just packet loss? 4) this fix Ignore the rc in the Qdisc-less+GSO case, since it's unreliable. We already always return OK in the TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS case. In the Qdisc-less case let's be a bit more conservative and only mask the GSO errors. This path is taken by non-IP-"networks" like CAN, MCTP etc, so we could regress some ancient thing. This is the simplest, but also maybe the hackiest fix? Similar fix has been proposed by Eric in the past but never committed because original reporter was working with an OOT driver and wasn't providing feedback (see Link).
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27755

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: consume xmit errors of GSO frames udpgro_frglist.sh and udpgro_bench.sh are the flakiest tests currently in NIPA. They fail in the same exact way, TCP GRO test stalls occasionally and the test gets killed after 10min. These tests use veth to simulate GRO. They attach a trivial ("return XDP_PASS;") XDP program to the veth to force TSO off and NAPI on. Digging into the failure mode we can see that the connection is completely stuck after a burst of drops. The sender's snd_nxt is at sequence number N [1], but the receiver claims to have received (rcv_nxt) up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. Last piece of the puzzle is that senders rtx queue is not empty (let's say the block in the rtx queue is at sequence number N - 4 * MSS [3]). In this state, sender sends a retransmission from the rtx queue with a single segment, and sequence numbers N-4*MSS:N-3*MSS [3]. Receiver sees it and responds with an ACK all the way up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. But sender will reject this ack as TCP_ACK_UNSENT_DATA because it has no recollection of ever sending data that far out [1]. And we are stuck. The root cause is the mess of the xmit return codes. veth returns an error when it can't xmit a frame. We end up with a loss event like this: ------------------------------------------------- | GSO super frame 1 | GSO super frame 2 | |-----------------------------------------------| | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ------------------------------------------------- x ok ok <ok>| ok ok ok <x> \\ snd_nxt "x" means packet lost by veth, and "ok" means it went thru. Since veth has TSO disabled in this test it sees individual segments. Segment 1 is on the retransmit queue and will be resent. So why did the sender not advance snd_nxt even tho it clearly did send up to seg 8? tcp_write_xmit() interprets the return code from the core to mean that data has not been sent at all. Since TCP deals with GSO super frames, not individual segment the crux of the problem is that loss of a single segment can be interpreted as loss of all. TCP only sees the last return code for the last segment of the GSO frame (in <> brackets in the diagram above). Of course for the problem to occur we need a setup or a device without a Qdisc. Otherwise Qdisc layer disconnects the protocol layer from the device errors completely. We have multiple ways to fix this. 1) make veth not return an error when it lost a packet. While this is what I think we did in the past, the issue keeps reappearing and it's annoying to debug. The game of whack a mole is not great. 2) fix the damn return codes We only talk about NETDEV_TX_OK and NETDEV_TX_BUSY in the documentation, so maybe we should make the return code from ndo_start_xmit() a boolean. I like that the most, but perhaps some ancient, not-really-networking protocol would suffer. 3) make TCP ignore the errors It is not entirely clear to me what benefit TCP gets from interpreting the result of ip_queue_xmit()? Specifically once the connection is established and we're pushing data - packet loss is just packet loss? 4) this fix Ignore the rc in the Qdisc-less+GSO case, since it's unreliable. We already always return OK in the TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS case. In the Qdisc-less case let's be a bit more conservative and only mask the GSO errors. This path is taken by non-IP-"networks" like CAN, MCTP etc, so we could regress some ancient thing. This is the simplest, but also maybe the hackiest fix? Similar fix has been proposed by Eric in the past but never committed because original reporter was working with an OOT driver and wasn't providing feedback (see Link).

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: consume xmit errors of GSO frames udpgro_frglist.sh and udpgro_bench.sh are the flakiest tests currently in NIPA. They fail in the same exact way, TCP GRO test stalls occasionally and the test gets killed after 10min. These tests use veth to simulate GRO. They attach a trivial ("return XDP_PASS;") XDP program to the veth to force TSO off and NAPI on. Digging into the failure mode we can see that the connection is completely stuck after a burst of drops. The sender's snd_nxt is at sequence number N [1], but the receiver claims to have received (rcv_nxt) up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. Last piece of the puzzle is that senders rtx queue is not empty (let's say the block in the rtx queue is at sequence number N - 4 * MSS [3]). In this state, sender sends a retransmission from the rtx queue with a single segment, and sequence numbers N-4*MSS:N-3*MSS [3]. Receiver sees it and responds with an ACK all the way up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. But sender will reject this ack as TCP_ACK_UNSENT_DATA because it has no recollection of ever sending data that far out [1]. And we are stuck. The root cause is the mess of the xmit return codes. veth returns an error when it can't xmit a frame. We end up with a loss event like this: ------------------------------------------------- | GSO super frame 1 | GSO super frame 2 | |-----------------------------------------------| | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ------------------------------------------------- x ok ok <ok>| ok ok ok <x> \\ snd_nxt "x" means packet lost by veth, and "ok" means it went thru. Since veth has TSO disabled in this test it sees individual segments. Segment 1 is on the retransmit queue and will be resent. So why did the sender not advance snd_nxt even tho it clearly did send up to seg 8? tcp_write_xmit() interprets the return code from the core to mean that data has not been sent at all. Since TCP deals with GSO super frames, not individual segment the crux of the problem is that loss of a single segment can be interpreted as loss of all. TCP only sees the last return code for the last segment of the GSO frame (in <> brackets in the diagram above). Of course for the problem to occur we need a setup or a device without a Qdisc. Otherwise Qdisc layer disconnects the protocol layer from the device errors completely. We have multiple ways to fix this. 1) make veth not return an error when it lost a packet. While this is what I think we did in the past, the issue keeps reappearing and it's annoying to debug. The game of whack a mole is not great. 2) fix the damn return codes We only talk about NETDEV_TX_OK and NETDEV_TX_BUSY in the documentation, so maybe we should make the return code from ndo_start_xmit() a boolean. I like that the most, but perhaps some ancient, not-really-networking protocol would suffer. 3) make TCP ignore the errors It is not entirely clear to me what benefit TCP gets from interpreting the result of ip_queue_xmit()? Specifically once the connection is established and we're pushing data - packet loss is just packet loss? 4) this fix Ignore the rc in the Qdisc-less+GSO case, since it's unreliable. We already always return OK in the TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS case. In the Qdisc-less case let's be a bit more conservative and only mask the GSO errors. This path is taken by non-IP-"networks" like CAN, MCTP etc, so we could regress some ancient thing. This is the simplest, but also maybe the hackiest fix? Similar fix has been proposed by Eric in the past but never committed because original reporter was working with an OOT driver and wasn't providing feedback (see Link).

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: consume xmit errors of GSO frames udpgro_frglist.sh and udpgro_bench.sh are the flakiest tests currently in NIPA. They fail in the same exact way, TCP GRO test stalls occasionally and the test gets killed after 10min. These tests use veth to simulate GRO. They attach a trivial ("return XDP_PASS;") XDP program to the veth to force TSO off and NAPI on. Digging into the failure mode we can see that the connection is completely stuck after a burst of drops. The sender's snd_nxt is at sequence number N [1], but the receiver claims to have received (rcv_nxt) up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. Last piece of the puzzle is that senders rtx queue is not empty (let's say the block in the rtx queue is at sequence number N - 4 * MSS [3]). In this state, sender sends a retransmission from the rtx queue with a single segment, and sequence numbers N-4*MSS:N-3*MSS [3]. Receiver sees it and responds with an ACK all the way up to N + 3 * MSS [2]. But sender will reject this ack as TCP_ACK_UNSENT_DATA because it has no recollection of ever sending data that far out [1]. And we are stuck. The root cause is the mess of the xmit return codes. veth returns an error when it can't xmit a frame. We end up with a loss event like this: ------------------------------------------------- | GSO super frame 1 | GSO super frame 2 | |-----------------------------------------------| | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | seg | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ------------------------------------------------- x ok ok <ok>| ok ok ok <x> \\ snd_nxt "x" means packet lost by veth, and "ok" means it went thru. Since veth has TSO disabled in this test it sees individual segments. Segment 1 is on the retransmit queue and will be resent. So why did the sender not advance snd_nxt even tho it clearly did send up to seg 8? tcp_write_xmit() interprets the return code from the core to mean that data has not been sent at all. Since TCP deals with GSO super frames, not individual segment the crux of the problem is that loss of a single segment can be interpreted as loss of all. TCP only sees the last return code for the last segment of the GSO frame (in <> brackets in the diagram above). Of course for the problem to occur we need a setup or a device without a Qdisc. Otherwise Qdisc layer disconnects the protocol layer from the device errors completely. We have multiple ways to fix this. 1) make veth not return an error when it lost a packet. While this is what I think we did in the past, the issue keeps reappearing and it's annoying to debug. The game of whack a mole is not great. 2) fix the damn return codes We only talk about NETDEV_TX_OK and NETDEV_TX_BUSY in the documentation, so maybe we should make the return code from ndo_start_xmit() a boolean. I like that the most, but perhaps some ancient, not-really-networking protocol would suffer. 3) make TCP ignore the errors It is not entirely clear to me what benefit TCP gets from interpreting the result of ip_queue_xmit()? Specifically once the connection is established and we're pushing data - packet loss is just packet loss? 4) this fix Ignore the rc in the Qdisc-less+GSO case, since it's unreliable. We already always return OK in the TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS case. In the Qdisc-less case let's be a bit more conservative and only mask the GSO errors. This path is taken by non-IP-"networks" like CAN, MCTP etc, so we could regress some ancient thing. This is the simplest, but also maybe the hackiest fix? Similar fix has been proposed by Eric in the past but never committed because original reporter was working with an OOT driver and wasn't providing feedback (see Link).

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1405Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43167 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43175 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43213 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43233 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43201 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43175 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43177 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43205 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43175 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43201 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43175 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43189 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43199 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43200 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43201 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-43159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43184 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43194 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43196 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43209 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43211 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-015186LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が解決されました。net: GSOフレームの送信(xmit)エラーを適切に処理するようになりました。現在、udpgro_frglist.shとudpgro_bench.shはNIPAで最も不安定なテストであり、両方とも同じ方法で失敗します。また、TCP GROテストは時々停止し、約10分後にテストが終了します。これらのテストはvethを使用してGROをシミュレートし、単純な(「return XDP_PASS;」)XDPプログラムをvethにアタッチしてTSOをオフにし、NAPIをオンにしています。障害モードを調査した結果、接続はパケットドロップの連続後に完全に停止していることが判明しました。送信者のsnd_nxtはシーケンス番号Nですが、受信者はN + 3 * MSSまで受信したと主張しています。問題の最後の部分では、送信者の再送キューが空でなく(キューのブロックはシーケンス番号N - 4 * MSSにあると仮定)、送信者はこの状態で再送キューから単一セグメント(シーケンス番号N-4*MSSからN-3*MSS)を再送します。受信者はそれを受け入れてACKをN + 3 * MSSまで返しますが、送信者はこれをTCP_ACK_UNSENT_DATAとして拒否します。なぜなら、その範囲までデータを送信した記憶がないからです。そして、システムは停止します。根本原因はxmitの戻り値コードの混乱にあります。vethはフレームを送信できない場合にエラーを返しますが、これにより損失イベントが発生します。図ではGSOスーパーフレームの各セグメントのうち1番目と8番目のパケットがvethで失われています。vethはこのテストでTSOを無効にしているため個々のセグメントを見ており、セグメント1は再送キューにあり再送されます。ではなぜ送信者は8番目のセグメントまで送信しているにもかかわらずsnd_nxtを進めないのでしょうか。tcp_write_xmit()はコアからの戻り値をデータが送信されていないと解釈しているからです。TCPはGSOスーパーフレーム単位で処理しているため、単一セグメントの損失を全体の損失と見なしてしまうことが問題の核心です。TCPはGSOフレームの最後のセグメントの戻り値コードのみを参照します。この問題の発生にはQdiscがない環境やデバイスが必要です。通常、Qdiscはプロトコル層をデバイスエラーから切り離しています。修正方法はいくつかあります。1) vethがパケットを失ってもエラーを返さないようにする方法。過去にこの方法を試みましたが問題は繰り返し発生し、デバッグが困難でした。2) 戻り値コードを修正する方法。ドキュメントではNETDEV_TX_OKとNETDEV_TX_BUSYのみが言及されているため、ndo_start_xmit()の戻り値をbooleanにするのが良いかもしれません。ただし古い非ネットワークプロトコルに影響が出る可能性があります。3) TCPがエラーを無視する方法。ip_queue_xmit()の結果をTCPが解釈する利点は不明であり、接続確立後のデータ送信中はパケット損失を単なる損失として扱うべきかもしれません。4) 今回の修正方法。QdiscがなくかつGSOケースで戻り値を無視し、TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASSの場合は常にOKを返しますが、QdiscなしではGSOエラーのみをマスクします。この方法はCANやMCTPなどの非IPネットワークにも影響を及ぼすため古い環境での後退が懸念されます。これが最も単純である反面、最もハッキング的な修正かもしれません。似た修正は以前Ericにより提案されましたが、報告者がアウトオブツリーのドライバを使用しフィードバックがなかったため採用されませんでした(詳細は参照してください)。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.18, 5.10.252 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.202 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.165 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.128 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.75 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.16 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.6 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27755
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43194 · cve.blacktree.nl