BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43119High confidence

Bluetooth: hci_sync: annotate data-races around hdev->req_status

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 24 Jul 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43119 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 22 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43119
201 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: annotate data-races around hdev->req_status __hci_cmd_sync_sk() sets hdev->req_status under hdev->req_lock: hdev->req_status = HCI_REQ_PEND; However, several other functions read or write hdev->req_status without holding any lock: - hci_send_cmd_sync() reads req_status in hci_cmd_work (workqueue) - hci_cmd_sync_complete() reads/writes from HCI event completion - hci_cmd_sync_cancel() / hci_cmd_sync_cancel_sync() read/write - hci_abort_conn() reads in connection abort path Since __hci_cmd_sync_sk() runs on hdev->req_workqueue while hci_send_cmd_sync() runs on hdev->workqueue, these are different workqueues that can execute concurrently on different CPUs. The plain C accesses constitute a data race. Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations on all concurrent accesses to hdev->req_status to prevent potential compiler optimizations that could affect correctness (e.g., load fusing in the wait_event condition or store reordering).
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27647

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: annotate data-races around hdev->req_status __hci_cmd_sync_sk() sets hdev->req_status under hdev->req_lock: hdev->req_status = HCI_REQ_PEND; However, several other functions read or write hdev->req_status without holding any lock: - hci_send_cmd_sync() reads req_status in hci_cmd_work (workqueue) - hci_cmd_sync_complete() reads/writes from HCI event completion - hci_cmd_sync_cancel() / hci_cmd_sync_cancel_sync() read/write - hci_abort_conn() reads in connection abort path Since __hci_cmd_sync_sk() runs on hdev->req_workqueue while hci_send_cmd_sync() runs on hdev->workqueue, these are different workqueues that can execute concurrently on different CPUs. The plain C accesses constitute a data race. Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations on all concurrent accesses to hdev->req_status to prevent potential compiler optimizations that could affect correctness (e.g., load fusing in the wait_event condition or store reordering).

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: annotate data-races around hdev->req_status __hci_cmd_sync_sk() sets hdev->req_status under hdev->req_lock: hdev->req_status = HCI_REQ_PEND; However, several other functions read or write hdev->req_status without holding any lock: - hci_send_cmd_sync() reads req_status in hci_cmd_work (workqueue) - hci_cmd_sync_complete() reads/writes from HCI event completion - hci_cmd_sync_cancel() / hci_cmd_sync_cancel_sync() read/write - hci_abort_conn() reads in connection abort path Since __hci_cmd_sync_sk() runs on hdev->req_workqueue while hci_send_cmd_sync() runs on hdev->workqueue, these are different workqueues that can execute concurrently on different CPUs. The plain C accesses constitute a data race. Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations on all concurrent accesses to hdev->req_status to prevent potential compiler optimizations that could affect correctness (e.g., load fusing in the wait_event condition or store reordering).

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: annotate data-races around hdev->req_status __hci_cmd_sync_sk() sets hdev->req_status under hdev->req_lock: hdev->req_status = HCI_REQ_PEND; However, several other functions read or write hdev->req_status without holding any lock: - hci_send_cmd_sync() reads req_status in hci_cmd_work (workqueue) - hci_cmd_sync_complete() reads/writes from HCI event completion - hci_cmd_sync_cancel() / hci_cmd_sync_cancel_sync() read/write - hci_abort_conn() reads in connection abort path Since __hci_cmd_sync_sk() runs on hdev->req_workqueue while hci_send_cmd_sync() runs on hdev->workqueue, these are different workqueues that can execute concurrently on different CPUs. The plain C accesses constitute a data race. Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations on all concurrent accesses to hdev->req_status to prevent potential compiler optimizations that could affect correctness (e.g., load fusing in the wait_event condition or store reordering).

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1385Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder potentiell beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43132 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-015371LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。Bluetoothのhci_syncにおけるhdev-req_status周辺のデータ競合に関する注釈付けです。__hci_cmd_sync_sk()はhdev-req_lockのもとでhdev-req_statusを設定します：hdev-req_status = HCI_REQ_PEND。しかし、複数の他の関数はロックを保持せずにhdev-req_statusを読み書きしています。具体的には、hci_send_cmd_sync()はhci_cmd_work（ワークキュー）内でreq_statusを読み取り、hci_cmd_sync_complete()はHCIイベント完了から読み書きし、hci_cmd_sync_cancel()およびhci_cmd_sync_cancel_sync()は読み書きを行い、hci_abort_conn()は接続中止パスで読み取っています。__hci_cmd_sync_sk()はhdev-req_workqueueで実行される一方、hci_send_cmd_sync()はhdev-workqueueで実行されます。これにより、これらは異なるワークキューであり異なるCPU上で同時に実行され得ます。単純なCアクセスはデータ競合を構成します。したがって、hdev-req_statusへのすべての同時アクセスにREAD_ONCE()およびWRITE_ONCE()の注釈を追加し、wait_event条件での読み込み融合やストア順序変更など、正確性に影響を与える可能性のあるコンパイラ最適化を防止しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.2, 6.6.145 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.83 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.24 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.14 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 24 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27647
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27647↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43119 · cve.blacktree.nl