BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43088High confidence

net: af_key: zero aligned sockaddr tail in PF_KEY exports

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.88-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27586

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: zero aligned sockaddr tail in PF_KEY exports PF_KEY export paths use `pfkey_sockaddr_size()` when reserving sockaddr payload space, so IPv6 addresses occupy 32 bytes on the wire. However, `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()` initializes only the first 28 bytes of `struct sockaddr_in6`, leaving the final 4 aligned bytes uninitialized. Not every PF_KEY message is affected. The state and policy dump builders already zero the whole message buffer before filling the sockaddr payloads. Keep the fix to the export paths that still append aligned sockaddr payloads with plain `skb_put()`: - `SADB_ACQUIRE` - `SADB_X_NAT_T_NEW_MAPPING` - `SADB_X_MIGRATE` Fix those paths by clearing only the aligned sockaddr tail after `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()`.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: zero aligned sockaddr tail in PF_KEY exports PF_KEY export paths use `pfkey_sockaddr_size()` when reserving sockaddr payload space, so IPv6 addresses occupy 32 bytes on the wire. However, `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()` initializes only the first 28 bytes of `struct sockaddr_in6`, leaving the final 4 aligned bytes uninitialized. Not every PF_KEY message is affected. The state and policy dump builders already zero the whole message buffer before filling the sockaddr payloads. Keep the fix to the export paths that still append aligned sockaddr payloads with plain `skb_put()`: - `SADB_ACQUIRE` - `SADB_X_NAT_T_NEW_MAPPING` - `SADB_X_MIGRATE` Fix those paths by clearing only the aligned sockaddr tail after `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()`.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: zero aligned sockaddr tail in PF_KEY exports PF_KEY export paths use `pfkey_sockaddr_size()` when reserving sockaddr payload space, so IPv6 addresses occupy 32 bytes on the wire. However, `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()` initializes only the first 28 bytes of `struct sockaddr_in6`, leaving the final 4 aligned bytes uninitialized. Not every PF_KEY message is affected. The state and policy dump builders already zero the whole message buffer before filling the sockaddr payloads. Keep the fix to the export paths that still append aligned sockaddr payloads with plain `skb_put()`: - `SADB_ACQUIRE` - `SADB_X_NAT_T_NEW_MAPPING` - `SADB_X_MIGRATE` Fix those paths by clearing only the aligned sockaddr tail after `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()`.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: zero aligned sockaddr tail in PF_KEY exports PF_KEY export paths use `pfkey_sockaddr_size()` when reserving sockaddr payload space, so IPv6 addresses occupy 32 bytes on the wire. However, `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()` initializes only the first 28 bytes of `struct sockaddr_in6`, leaving the final 4 aligned bytes uninitialized. Not every PF_KEY message is affected. The state and policy dump builders already zero the whole message buffer before filling the sockaddr payloads. Keep the fix to the export paths that still append aligned sockaddr payloads with plain `skb_put()`: - `SADB_ACQUIRE` - `SADB_X_NAT_T_NEW_MAPPING` - `SADB_X_MIGRATE` Fix those paths by clearing only the aligned sockaddr tail after `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()`.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27586Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: af_key: zero aligned sockaddr tail in PF_KEY exports PF_KEY export paths use `pfkey_sockaddr_size()` when reserving sockaddr payload space, so IPv6 addresses occupy 32 bytes on the wire. However, `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()` initializes only the first 28 bytes of `struct sockaddr_in6`, leaving the final 4 aligned bytes uninitialized. Not every PF_KEY message is affected. The state and policy dump builders already zero the whole message buffer before filling the sockaddr payloads. Keep the fix to the export paths that still append aligned sockaddr payloads with plain `skb_put()`: - `SADB_ACQUIRE` - `SADB_X_NAT_T_NEW_MAPPING` - `SADB_X_MIGRATE` Fix those paths by clearing only the aligned sockaddr tail after `pfkey_sockaddr_fill()`.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1385Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder potentiell beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43045 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43153 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43214 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43265 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0664Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31681 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31738 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0637Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-017143LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、net: af_keyのPF_KEYエクスポートでゼロ初期化されていないアラインドsockaddrの末尾に関する脆弱性が修正されました。PF_KEYのエクスポート経路はsockaddrペイロード領域確保時にpfkey_sockaddr_size()を使用し、IPv6アドレスがワイヤ上で32バイトを占めるにもかかわらず、pfkey_sockaddr_fill()はstruct sockaddr_in6の最初の28バイトしか初期化せず、最後の4バイトが未初期化のままでした。この問題はすべてのPF_KEYメッセージに影響するわけではなく、特にSADB_ACQUIRE、SADB_X_NAT_T_NEW_MAPPING、およびSADB_X_MIGRATEのエクスポート経路で発生しました。これらの経路では、pfkey_sockaddr_fill()の後に未初期化のアラインドsockaddrの末尾部分をクリアする修正が適用されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 2e74f974359b5382ecbe8536abbb5b837eb6c724, patch: 6.12.88, patch: 6.19.14, patch: 6.1.188, patch: 7.0, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < e357c3cf8a44d4ec1f49ad6981e4ab9704354347, patch: 6.6.143, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < edd446ee7cd3d02cac246168063d5b3e9ea68460, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 3c19cb8a84ef709d57943bd6664cf31cb91ba6ec, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 11cbf294bac623bd57296f231199193087f57b4a, 2.6.12, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 746ee79d9e140f0e9e56f5123eaa88ad9332de7b, patch: 5.10.270, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 6df5f90175fe4c584e9960b6c00131a7bf2b5399, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 426c355742f02cf743b347d9d7dbdc1bfbfa31ef, patch: 0, patch: 5.15.221, patch: 6.18.30
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.12, 5.10.270 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.221 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.188 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.14 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 14 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27586
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 3c19cb8a84ef709d57943bd6664cf31cb91ba6ec; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 11cbf294bac623bd57296f231199193087f57b4a; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < edd446ee7cd3d02cac246168063d5b3e9ea68460; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 2e74f974359b5382ecbe8536abbb5b837eb6c724; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 426c355742f02cf743b347d9d7dbdc1bfbfa31ef; 2.6.12 · Fixed: < 2.6.12; 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19.14 ≤ 6.19.*; 7.0 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 6df5f90175fe4c584e9960b6c00131a7bf2b5399, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 746ee79d9e140f0e9e56f5123eaa88ad9332de7b, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < e357c3cf8a44d4ec1f49ad6981e4ab9704354347, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 3c19cb8a84ef709d57943bd6664cf31cb91ba6ec, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 11cbf294bac623bd57296f231199193087f57b4a, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < edd446ee7cd3d02cac246168063d5b3e9ea68460, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 2e74f974359b5382ecbe8536abbb5b837eb6c724, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 426c355742f02cf743b347d9d7dbdc1bfbfa31ef, 2.6.12 · Fixed: Linux: < 2.6.12, 5.10.270 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.221 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.188 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.88 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.30 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.14 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43088 · cve.blacktree.nl