BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43083High confidence

net: ioam6: fix OOB and missing lock

Linux · Linux

9.1CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.63% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 22 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-43083 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 19 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-43083
47 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ioam6: fix OOB and missing lock When trace->type.bit6 is set: if (trace->type.bit6) { ... queue = skb_get_tx_queue(dev, skb); qdisc = rcu_dereference(queue->qdisc); This code can lead to an out-of-bounds access of the dev->_tx[] array when is_input is true. In such a case, the packet is on the RX path and skb->queue_mapping contains the RX queue index of the ingress device. If the ingress device has more RX queues than the egress device (dev) has TX queues, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) will exceed dev->num_tx_queues. Add a check to avoid this situation since skb_get_tx_queue() does not clamp the index. This issue has also revealed that per queue visibility cannot be accurate and will be replaced later as a new feature. While at it, add missing lock around qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog(). The function __ioam6_fill_trace_data() is called from both softirq and process contexts, hence the use of spin_lock_bh() here.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27576

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ioam6: fix OOB and missing lock When trace->type.bit6 is set: if (trace->type.bit6) { ... queue = skb_get_tx_queue(dev, skb); qdisc = rcu_dereference(queue->qdisc); This code can lead to an out-of-bounds access of the dev->_tx[] array when is_input is true. In such a case, the packet is on the RX path and skb->queue_mapping contains the RX queue index of the ingress device. If the ingress device has more RX queues than the egress device (dev) has TX queues, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) will exceed dev->num_tx_queues. Add a check to avoid this situation since skb_get_tx_queue() does not clamp the index. This issue has also revealed that per queue visibility cannot be accurate and will be replaced later as a new feature. While at it, add missing lock around qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog(). The function __ioam6_fill_trace_data() is called from both softirq and process contexts, hence the use of spin_lock_bh() here.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ioam6: fix OOB and missing lock When trace->type.bit6 is set: if (trace->type.bit6) { ... queue = skb_get_tx_queue(dev, skb); qdisc = rcu_dereference(queue->qdisc); This code can lead to an out-of-bounds access of the dev->_tx[] array when is_input is true. In such a case, the packet is on the RX path and skb->queue_mapping contains the RX queue index of the ingress device. If the ingress device has more RX queues than the egress device (dev) has TX queues, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) will exceed dev->num_tx_queues. Add a check to avoid this situation since skb_get_tx_queue() does not clamp the index. This issue has also revealed that per queue visibility cannot be accurate and will be replaced later as a new feature. While at it, add missing lock around qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog(). The function __ioam6_fill_trace_data() is called from both softirq and process contexts, hence the use of spin_lock_bh() here.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ioam6: fix OOB and missing lock When trace->type.bit6 is set: if (trace->type.bit6) { ... queue = skb_get_tx_queue(dev, skb); qdisc = rcu_dereference(queue->qdisc); This code can lead to an out-of-bounds access of the dev->_tx[] array when is_input is true. In such a case, the packet is on the RX path and skb->queue_mapping contains the RX queue index of the ingress device. If the ingress device has more RX queues than the egress device (dev) has TX queues, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) will exceed dev->num_tx_queues. Add a check to avoid this situation since skb_get_tx_queue() does not clamp the index. This issue has also revealed that per queue visibility cannot be accurate and will be replaced later as a new feature. While at it, add missing lock around qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog(). The function __ioam6_fill_trace_data() is called from both softirq and process contexts, hence the use of spin_lock_bh() here.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1385Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder potentiell beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260513Security Bulletin 13 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 May 2026, published on 13 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1027Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43198 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43379 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43407 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43064 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43069 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43076 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43082 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43084 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43092 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0898Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43185 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43186 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43197 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43080 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43081 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43085 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43073 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43117 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43130 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-017832LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。net: ioam6に関する範囲外アクセス(OOB)および不足していたロックの修正です。trace-type.bit6が設定されている場合、is_inputがtrueのときにdev-_tx[]配列の範囲外アクセスが発生する可能性があります。パケットは受信パス上にあり、skb-queue_mappingはイングレスデバイスの受信キューのインデックスを示します。イングレスデバイスの受信キュー数がエグレスデバイス(dev)の送信キュー数より多い場合、skb_get_queue_mapping(skb)はdev-num_tx_queuesを超えることがあります。skb_get_tx_queue()はインデックスの制限を行わないため、この状況を防ぐためのチェックを追加しました。この問題はキューごとの可視性が正確でないことを明らかにし、将来的に新機能で置き換えられる予定です。また、qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog()の周囲に不足していたロックも追加しました。__ioam6_fill_trace_data()関数はsoftirqとプロセスコンテキストの両方から呼び出されるため、ここでspin_lock_bh()を使用しています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.17, 6.18.24 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.14 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27576
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43083 · cve.blacktree.nl