BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43054High confidence

scsi: target: tcm_loop: Drain commands in target_reset handler

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-26653

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: target: tcm_loop: Drain commands in target_reset handler tcm_loop_target_reset() violates the SCSI EH contract: it returns SUCCESS without draining any in-flight commands. The SCSI EH documentation (scsi_eh.rst) requires that when a reset handler returns SUCCESS the driver has made lower layers "forget about timed out scmds" and is ready for new commands. Every other SCSI LLD (virtio_scsi, mpt3sas, ipr, scsi_debug, mpi3mr) enforces this by draining or completing outstanding commands before returning SUCCESS. Because tcm_loop_target_reset() doesn't drain, the SCSI EH reuses in-flight scsi_cmnd structures for recovery commands (e.g. TUR) while the target core still has async completion work queued for the old se_cmd. The memset in queuecommand zeroes se_lun and lun_ref_active, causing transport_lun_remove_cmd() to skip its percpu_ref_put(). The leaked LUN reference prevents transport_clear_lun_ref() from completing, hanging configfs LUN unlink forever in D-state: INFO: task rm:264 blocked for more than 122 seconds. rm D 0 264 258 0x00004000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x3d0/0x8e0 schedule+0x36/0xf0 transport_clear_lun_ref+0x78/0x90 [target_core_mod] core_tpg_remove_lun+0x28/0xb0 [target_core_mod] target_fabric_port_unlink+0x50/0x60 [target_core_mod] configfs_unlink+0x156/0x1f0 [configfs] vfs_unlink+0x109/0x290 do_unlinkat+0x1d5/0x2d0 Fix this by making tcm_loop_target_reset() actually drain commands: 1. Issue TMR_LUN_RESET via tcm_loop_issue_tmr() to drain all commands that the target core knows about (those not yet CMD_T_COMPLETE). 2. Use blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() to iterate all started requests and flush_work() on each se_cmd — this drains any deferred completion work for commands that already had CMD_T_COMPLETE set before the TMR (which the TMR skips via __target_check_io_state()). This is the same pattern used by mpi3mr, scsi_debug, and libsas to drain outstanding commands during reset.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: target: tcm_loop: Drain commands in target_reset handler tcm_loop_target_reset() violates the SCSI EH contract: it returns SUCCESS without draining any in-flight commands. The SCSI EH documentation (scsi_eh.rst) requires that when a reset handler returns SUCCESS the driver has made lower layers "forget about timed out scmds" and is ready for new commands. Every other SCSI LLD (virtio_scsi, mpt3sas, ipr, scsi_debug, mpi3mr) enforces this by draining or completing outstanding commands before returning SUCCESS. Because tcm_loop_target_reset() doesn't drain, the SCSI EH reuses in-flight scsi_cmnd structures for recovery commands (e.g. TUR) while the target core still has async completion work queued for the old se_cmd. The memset in queuecommand zeroes se_lun and lun_ref_active, causing transport_lun_remove_cmd() to skip its percpu_ref_put(). The leaked LUN reference prevents transport_clear_lun_ref() from completing, hanging configfs LUN unlink forever in D-state: INFO: task rm:264 blocked for more than 122 seconds. rm D 0 264 258 0x00004000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x3d0/0x8e0 schedule+0x36/0xf0 transport_clear_lun_ref+0x78/0x90 [target_core_mod] core_tpg_remove_lun+0x28/0xb0 [target_core_mod] target_fabric_port_unlink+0x50/0x60 [target_core_mod] configfs_unlink+0x156/0x1f0 [configfs] vfs_unlink+0x109/0x290 do_unlinkat+0x1d5/0x2d0 Fix this by making tcm_loop_target_reset() actually drain commands: 1. Issue TMR_LUN_RESET via tcm_loop_issue_tmr() to drain all commands that the target core knows about (those not yet CMD_T_COMPLETE). 2. Use blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() to iterate all started requests and flush_work() on each se_cmd — this drains any deferred completion work for commands that already had CMD_T_COMPLETE set before the TMR (which the TMR skips via __target_check_io_state()). This is the same pattern used by mpi3mr, scsi_debug, and libsas to drain outstanding commands during reset.

Why

The product does not release a resource after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the resource is no longer needed.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: target: tcm_loop: Drain commands in target_reset handler tcm_loop_target_reset() violates the SCSI EH contract: it returns SUCCESS without draining any in-flight commands. The SCSI EH documentation (scsi_eh.rst) requires that when a reset handler returns SUCCESS the driver has made lower layers "forget about timed out scmds" and is ready for new commands. Every other SCSI LLD (virtio_scsi, mpt3sas, ipr, scsi_debug, mpi3mr) enforces this by draining or completing outstanding commands before returning SUCCESS. Because tcm_loop_target_reset() doesn't drain, the SCSI EH reuses in-flight scsi_cmnd structures for recovery commands (e.g. TUR) while the target core still has async completion work queued for the old se_cmd. The memset in queuecommand zeroes se_lun and lun_ref_active, causing transport_lun_remove_cmd() to skip its percpu_ref_put(). The leaked LUN reference prevents transport_clear_lun_ref() from completing, hanging configfs LUN unlink forever in D-state: INFO: task rm:264 blocked for more than 122 seconds. rm D 0 264 258 0x00004000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x3d0/0x8e0 schedule+0x36/0xf0 transport_clear_lun_ref+0x78/0x90 [target_core_mod] core_tpg_remove_lun+0x28/0xb0 [target_core_mod] target_fabric_port_unlink+0x50/0x60 [target_core_mod] configfs_unlink+0x156/0x1f0 [configfs] vfs_unlink+0x109/0x290 do_unlinkat+0x1d5/0x2d0 Fix this by making tcm_loop_target_reset() actually drain commands: 1. Issue TMR_LUN_RESET via tcm_loop_issue_tmr() to drain all commands that the target core knows about (those not yet CMD_T_COMPLETE). 2. Use blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() to iterate all started requests and flush_work() on each se_cmd — this drains any deferred completion work for commands that already had CMD_T_COMPLETE set before the TMR (which the TMR skips via __target_check_io_state()). This is the same pattern used by mpi3mr, scsi_debug, and libsas to drain outstanding commands during reset.

Why

The product does not release a resource after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the resource is no longer needed.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-772 ↗

CWE-772: Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime. The product does not release a resource after its effective lifetime has ended, i.e., after the resource is no longer needed.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-772
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1346Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43044 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43060 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43061 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43062 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43079 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43053 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43083 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31774 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0782Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43063 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43068 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31729 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31736 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43012 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43190 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43206 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43234 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43252 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43057 Gestion détaillée du document le 07 mai 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43043 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43046 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43047 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43057 Gestion détaillée du document le 07 mai 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014754LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける有効なライフタイム後のリソースの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。scsi: target: tcm_loop: target_resetハンドラーでのコマンド排出問題です。tcm_loop_target_reset()はSCSI EHの契約に違反しており、実際にはコマンドを排出せずにSUCCESSを返しています。SCSI EHのドキュメント(scsi_eh.rst)によると、リセットハンドラーがSUCCESSを返す場合、ドライバーは下位層の「タイムアウトしたscmdを忘れておらず」、新しいコマンドの準備ができている必要があると規定されています。他のすべてのSCSI LLD(virtio_scsi、mpt3sas、ipr、scsi_debug、mpi3mr)は、SUCCESSを返す前に保留中のコマンドを排出または完了させることでこれを保証しています。tcm_loop_target_reset()がコマンドを排出しないため、SCSI EHはターゲットコアがまだ古いse_cmdの非同期完了作業を保持している間に回復コマンド(例:TUR)に対してin-flightのscsi_cmnd構造を再利用してしまいます。queuecommand内のmemsetがse_lunとlun_ref_activeをゼロクリアし、transport_lun_remove_cmd()がpercpu_ref_put()の呼び出しをスキップします。このリークしたLUN参照によりtransport_clear_lun_ref()が完了せず、configfsのLUN解除はD状態で永久にハングします。INFO: task rm:264 が122秒以上ブロックされています。rm D 0 264 258 0x00004000 Call Trace: __schedule+0x3d0/0x8e0、schedule+0x36/0xf0、transport_clear_lun_ref+0x78/0x90 [target_core_mod]、core_tpg_remove_lun+0x28/0xb0 [target_core_mod]、target_fabric_port_unlink+0x50/0x60 [target_core_mod]、configfs_unlink+0x156/0x1f0 [configfs]、vfs_unlink+0x109/0x290、do_unlinkat+0x1d5/0x2d0。修正内容は、tcm_loop_target_reset()で実際にコマンドを排出することです。1. tcm_loop_issue_tmr()を介してTMR_LUN_RESETを発行し、ターゲットコアが知っているすべてのコマンド(まだCMD_T_COMPLETEでないもの)を排出します。2. blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter()を用いて開始されたすべてのリクエストを反復処理し、各se_cmdに対してflush_work()を行います。これはTMRの前にすでにCMD_T_COMPLETEがセットされていたコマンドの保留中完了作業を排出するためのものであり(TMRは__target_check_io_state()でこれらをスキップします)、mpi3mr、scsi_debug、libsasがリセット時に未完了コマンドを排出するために使用しているパターンと同様です。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e0eb5d38b732b011cd9ed5b1bf9f59b83c2500d3 < 757c43c692294cdfad31390accc0e90429b2ef8a, e0eb5d38b732b011cd9ed5b1bf9f59b83c2500d3 < 103f79e4949513247d763c6e7f3cbbf62017afdf, e0eb5d38b732b011cd9ed5b1bf9f59b83c2500d3 < 15f5241d5a52364a7e7867b49128b0442dbcad9d, e0eb5d38b732b011cd9ed5b1bf9f59b83c2500d3 < 7cbd69aaa507b1245240a28022bf5da0f07c68d9, e0eb5d38b732b011cd9ed5b1bf9f59b83c2500d3 < a836054ea81014117ec6b73529a21626a9e1f829, e0eb5d38b732b011cd9ed5b1bf9f59b83c2500d3 < 05ac3754467363558a0a54ae4bb7c89b2c9574cf, e0eb5d38b732b011cd9ed5b1bf9f59b83c2500d3 < 1333eee56cdf3f0cf67c6ab4114c2c9e0a952026, 5.13
Fixed
Linux: < 5.13, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.134 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.81 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.22 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.12 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:16 UTC · CWE-772 · Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26653
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43054 · cve.blacktree.nl