BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-43026High confidence

netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-26625

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26625Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1346Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31773 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31778 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43019 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31773 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43041 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43019 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43019 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

26-31452, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31504, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31533, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-40355, CVE-2026-41989, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43033, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46300 et CVE-2026-46333. SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2026-54429 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Doc

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43010 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43022 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43034 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31752 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31774 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43059 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43065 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0782Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-34180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-34182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-42766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42766 Référence CVE CVE-2026-42770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42770 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43012 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43054 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31786 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43017 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43020 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43032 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014989LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。netfilterのctnetlinkにおいて、CTA_EXPECT_NATが存在しない場合にNATフィールドがゼロクリアされない問題がありました。ctnetlink_alloc_expect()はnf_ct_expect_alloc()を介して非ゼロ初期化のスラブキャッシュから期待値を割り当てます。netlinkメッセージにCTA_EXPECT_NATが存在しないと、saved_addrとsaved_protoは初期化されません。そのため、以前のスラブ使用者の古いデータがctnetlink_exp_dump_expect()によってユーザ空間に出力される可能性があります。この関数はCTA_EXPECT_NATを出力するかどうかをこれらのフィールドの値で判断します。パケットパスで使用される安全なnf_ct_expect_init()はこれらのフィールドを明示的にゼロクリアしています。NATが有効な場合にのみ存在するこれらのフィールド(saved_addr、saved_proto、dir)をIS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)で制御されたelseブランチ内でゼロクリアするように修正されました。脆弱性は、NATを含む期待値でexpectスラブを初期化し、それを解放後にCTA_EXPECT_NATなしの新しい期待値を作成し、ctnetlinkのダンプが以前の割り当てからの古いデータを含む誤ったCTA_EXPECT_NATを出力することを確認することで証明されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.4, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.134 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.81 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.22 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.12 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26625
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < a5a89db6981a1ddf2314bf50cb49db5a3146185f; 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < 1c2ebdeff8d088a2e47ae25d7b38447249adace2; 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < a64b7bf84b4d5ea54218c5d374ec87fff9000f43; 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < 2898080c054ea4d6ddfaaf21bbedbc229a9a8376; 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < fd002ff2ea030cbfb0188a11b3c60ce7f84485f4; 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < 929f7a9a7aad9404a5867216c3f8738232355b38; 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < bff0f4f06f12d6d9bc565a3e1378abd4f6f5ce36; 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < 35177c6877134a21315f37d57a5577846225623e · Fixed: < 3.4; 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.134 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.81 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.22 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19.12 ≤ 6.19.*
    After
    Linux: 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < a5a89db6981a1ddf2314bf50cb49db5a3146185f, 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < 1c2ebdeff8d088a2e47ae25d7b38447249adace2, 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < a64b7bf84b4d5ea54218c5d374ec87fff9000f43, 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < 2898080c054ea4d6ddfaaf21bbedbc229a9a8376, 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < fd002ff2ea030cbfb0188a11b3c60ce7f84485f4, 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < 929f7a9a7aad9404a5867216c3f8738232355b38, 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < bff0f4f06f12d6d9bc565a3e1378abd4f6f5ce36, 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb < 35177c6877134a21315f37d57a5577846225623e, 3.4 · Fixed: Linux: < 3.4, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.134 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.81 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.22 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.12 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-43026 · cve.blacktree.nl