BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-35188High confidence

Double-free When Checking OCSP Stapled Response

OpenSSL · OpenSSL

5.0MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs OpenSSL OpenSSL and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceopensslNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceopensslNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceopensslVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.6.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceopensslVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.6.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-35188 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityopenssl: Double-free When Checking OCSP Stapled Response
70 fixed

The vendor explicitly identifies these products or versions as containing the fix.

  • bootupd-0:0.3.2-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • bootupd-0:0.3.2-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • chunkah-0:0.6.0-3.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • chunkah-0:0.6.0-3.hum1@src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • chunkah-0:0.6.0-3.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • openssl-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • openssl-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • openssl-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • openssl-config-fips-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • openssl-config-fips-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • openssl-devel-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
  • openssl-devel-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
Summary
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A malicious server can exploit the TLS Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) stapling feature by sending a specially crafted response. This can trigger a double-free vulnerability in the client's certificate verification process, potentially leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or, with greater technical complexity, arbitrary code execution. This issue occurs when OCSP stapling is enabled, which is not the default configuration.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://images.redhat.com/
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-35480

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Issue summary: A malicious server can exploit TLS OCSP stapling by delivering a crafted response through the status_request extension, triggering a double-free in the client's certificate verification path. Impact summary: Successful exploitation allows an attacker to corrupt heap memory via a double-free, potentially leading to a Denial of Service or possibly an attacker controlled code execution or other undefined behavior. If OCSP stapling is enabled and the TLS client connects to a malicious server, a crafted OCSP stapled response can trigger a double free in the TLS client when the stapled response is checked. The OCSP stapling is not enabled by default. Reliable code execution through a double-free is technically complex and highly environment-dependent but the Denial of Service impact is straightforward to achieve, warranting Moderate severity. No FIPS modules are affected by this issue as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

What

Issue summary: A malicious server can exploit TLS OCSP stapling by delivering a crafted response through the status_request extension, triggering a double-free in the client's certificate verification path. Impact summary: Successful exploitation allows an attacker to corrupt heap memory via a double-free, potentially leading to a Denial of Service or possibly an attacker controlled code execution or other undefined behavior. If OCSP stapling is enabled and the TLS client connects to a malicious server, a crafted OCSP stapled response can trigger a double free in the TLS client when the stapled response is checked. The OCSP stapling is not enabled by default. Reliable code execution through a double-free is technically complex and highly environment-dependent but the Denial of Service impact is straightforward to achieve, warranting Moderate severity. No FIPS modules are affected by this issue as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

Issue summary: A malicious server can exploit TLS OCSP stapling by delivering a crafted response through the status_request extension, triggering a double-free in the client's certificate verification path. Impact summary: Successful exploitation allows an attacker to corrupt heap memory via a double-free, potentially leading to a Denial of Service or possibly an attacker controlled code execution or other undefined behavior. If OCSP stapling is enabled and the TLS client connects to a malicious server, a crafted OCSP stapled response can trigger a double free in the TLS client when the stapled response is checked. The OCSP stapling is not enabled by default. Reliable code execution through a double-free is technically complex and highly environment-dependent but the Denial of Service impact is straightforward to achieve, warranting Moderate severity. No FIPS modules are affected by this issue as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Double Free → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-415 ↗

CWE-415: Double Free. The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkDenial of serviceCWE-415
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2455Oracle Solaris Drittanbieterkomponenten: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in verschiedenen Komponenten von Drittanbietern in Oracle Solaris ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1852OpenSSL: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Daten zu manipulieren oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260610Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2026, published on 10 June 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0796Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Identity Exposure

d?id=CVE-2026-32177 Référence CVE CVE-2026-32178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32178 Référence CVE CVE-2026-32203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32203 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-34180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34180 Référence CVE CVE-2026-34181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34181 Référence CVE CVE-2026-34182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34182 Référence CVE CVE-2026-34183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34183 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35188 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35433 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3783 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3784 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3805 Référence CVE CVE-2026-40370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40370 Référence CVE CVE-2026-42764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42764 Référence CVE CVE-2026-42765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42765 Référence CVE CVE-2026-42766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans OpenSSL

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-019879OpenSSL ProjectのOpenSSLにおける二重解放に関する脆弱性

問題の概要: 悪意のあるサーバーがTLS OCSPステープリングを悪用し、status_request拡張を介して細工された応答を送信することで、クライアントの証明書検証パスにおいて二重解放を引き起こす可能性があります。影響の概要: 成功した悪用により、攻撃者は二重解放を通じてヒープメモリを破損させることができ、それによってサービス拒否(DoS)や攻撃者が制御するコードの実行、その他未定義の動作を引き起こす可能性があります。OCSPステープリングが有効で、TLSクライアントが悪意のあるサーバーに接続した場合、細工されたOCSPステープル応答がTLSクライアントの二重解放を引き起こします。OCSPステープリングはデフォルトで有効になっていません。二重解放を通じた信頼性の高いコード実行は技術的に複雑で環境依存性が高いですが、サービス拒否の影響は明確であり、中程度の深刻度と評価されています。本問題はOpenSSL FIPSモジュールの境界外のコードに影響を与えるため、FIPSモジュールには影響しません。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
OpenSSL: 4.0.0 < 4.0.1, 3.6.0 < 3.6.3
Fixed
Action
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://images.redhat.com/
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Jun 2026 · Last source change 10 Jun 2026, 20:02 UTC · CWE-415 · Double Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-35480
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    4.0.0 < 4.0.1; 3.6.0 < 3.6.3 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    4.0.0 < 4.0.1; 3.6.0 < 3.6.3 · Fixed: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://images.redhat.com/
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188 to remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188
    After
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  3. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Mitigation available to Patch available.
    Before
    Mitigation available
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  4. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    chunkah.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; python-cryptography.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby3.3.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby3.4.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby4.0.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; rust-bootupd.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
    After
    Fixed: bootupd-0:0.3.2-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; bootupd-0:0.3.2-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; chunkah-0:0.6.0-3.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; chunkah-0:0.6.0-3.hum1@src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; chunkah-0:0.6.0-3.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-config-fips-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-config-fips-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-devel-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-devel-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-devel-engine-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-devel-engine-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-fips-provider-upstream-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-fips-provider-upstream-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-libs-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-libs-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-perl-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl-perl-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3-devel-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3-devel-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3-devel-engine-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3-devel-engine-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3-libs-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3-libs-0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; python-cryptography-0:50.0.0-1.hum1@src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; python3-cryptography-0:50.0.0-1.hum1@aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; python3-cryptography-0:50.0.0-1.hum1@x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; and 40 more
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  5. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    chunkah.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; python-cryptography.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby3.3.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby3.4.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby4.0.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; rust-bootupd.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; unbound.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
    After
    chunkah.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; python-cryptography.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby3.3.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby3.4.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby4.0.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; rust-bootupd.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  6. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188 to remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188
    After
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  7. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  8. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    After
    chunkah.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; openssl3.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; python-cryptography.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby3.3.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby3.4.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; ruby4.0.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; rust-bootupd.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images; unbound.src as a component of Red Hat Hardened Images
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  9. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188 to remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188
    After
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  10. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Mitigation available to Awaiting fix.
    Before
    Mitigation available
    After
    Awaiting fix
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  11. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    jbcs-httpd24-openssl as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl-devel as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl-libs as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl-perl as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl-static as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl.src as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-openssl-win6-x86_64.zip as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services
    After
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  12. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed from remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188 to remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188.
    Before
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188
    After
    remediation: access.redhat.com/CVE-2026-35188
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  13. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  14. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    After
    jbcs-httpd24-openssl as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl-devel as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl-libs as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl-perl as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl-static as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-httpd24-openssl.src as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services; jbcs-openssl-win6-x86_64.zip as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-35188 · cve.blacktree.nl