BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31772High confidence

Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix stack buffer overflow in hci_le_big_create_sync

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-31772 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 6 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-31772
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build
  • SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix stack buffer overflow in hci_le_big_create_sync hci_le_big_create_sync() uses DEFINE_FLEX to allocate a struct hci_cp_le_big_create_sync on the stack with room for 0x11 (17) BIS entries. However, conn->num_bis can hold up to HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS (31) entries - validated against ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS (0x1f) in the caller hci_conn_big_create_sync(). When conn->num_bis is between 18 and 31, the memcpy that copies conn->bis into cp->bis writes up to 14 bytes past the stack buffer, corrupting adjacent stack memory. This is trivially reproducible: binding an ISO socket with bc_num_bis = ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS (31) and calling listen() will eventually trigger hci_le_big_create_sync() from the HCI command sync worker, causing a KASAN-detectable stack-out-of-bounds write: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hci_le_big_create_sync+0x256/0x3b0 Write of size 31 at addr ffffc90000487b48 by task kworker/u9:0/71 Fix this by changing the DEFINE_FLEX count from the incorrect 0x11 to HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS, which matches the maximum number of BIS entries that conn->bis can actually carry.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-26585

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix stack buffer overflow in hci_le_big_create_sync hci_le_big_create_sync() uses DEFINE_FLEX to allocate a struct hci_cp_le_big_create_sync on the stack with room for 0x11 (17) BIS entries. However, conn->num_bis can hold up to HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS (31) entries — validated against ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS (0x1f) in the caller hci_conn_big_create_sync(). When conn->num_bis is between 18 and 31, the memcpy that copies conn->bis into cp->bis writes up to 14 bytes past the stack buffer, corrupting adjacent stack memory. This is trivially reproducible: binding an ISO socket with bc_num_bis = ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS (31) and calling listen() will eventually trigger hci_le_big_create_sync() from the HCI command sync worker, causing a KASAN-detectable stack-out-of-bounds write: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hci_le_big_create_sync+0x256/0x3b0 Write of size 31 at addr ffffc90000487b48 by task kworker/u9:0/71 Fix this by changing the DEFINE_FLEX count from the incorrect 0x11 to HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS, which matches the maximum number of BIS entries that conn->bis can actually carry.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix stack buffer overflow in hci_le_big_create_sync hci_le_big_create_sync() uses DEFINE_FLEX to allocate a struct hci_cp_le_big_create_sync on the stack with room for 0x11 (17) BIS entries. However, conn->num_bis can hold up to HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS (31) entries — validated against ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS (0x1f) in the caller hci_conn_big_create_sync(). When conn->num_bis is between 18 and 31, the memcpy that copies conn->bis into cp->bis writes up to 14 bytes past the stack buffer, corrupting adjacent stack memory. This is trivially reproducible: binding an ISO socket with bc_num_bis = ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS (31) and calling listen() will eventually trigger hci_le_big_create_sync() from the HCI command sync worker, causing a KASAN-detectable stack-out-of-bounds write: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hci_le_big_create_sync+0x256/0x3b0 Write of size 31 at addr ffffc90000487b48 by task kworker/u9:0/71 Fix this by changing the DEFINE_FLEX count from the incorrect 0x11 to HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS, which matches the maximum number of BIS entries that conn->bis can actually carry.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: fix stack buffer overflow in hci_le_big_create_sync hci_le_big_create_sync() uses DEFINE_FLEX to allocate a struct hci_cp_le_big_create_sync on the stack with room for 0x11 (17) BIS entries. However, conn->num_bis can hold up to HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS (31) entries — validated against ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS (0x1f) in the caller hci_conn_big_create_sync(). When conn->num_bis is between 18 and 31, the memcpy that copies conn->bis into cp->bis writes up to 14 bytes past the stack buffer, corrupting adjacent stack memory. This is trivially reproducible: binding an ISO socket with bc_num_bis = ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS (31) and calling listen() will eventually trigger hci_le_big_create_sync() from the HCI command sync worker, causing a KASAN-detectable stack-out-of-bounds write: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hci_le_big_create_sync+0x256/0x3b0 Write of size 31 at addr ffffc90000487b48 by task kworker/u9:0/71 Fix this by changing the DEFINE_FLEX count from the incorrect 0x11 to HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS, which matches the maximum number of BIS entries that conn->bis can actually carry.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1346Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31756 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31761 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31762 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31763 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31768 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31770 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31772 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31773 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31779 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31761 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31762 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31763 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31765 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31768 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31770 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31772 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31773 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31776 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31779 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31756 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31761 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31762 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31763 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31768 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31770 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31772 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31773 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31779 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31756 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31761 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31762 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31763 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31768 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31770 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31772 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31773 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31779 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0808Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

u 25 juin 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26542 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:30129 du 25 juin 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31641 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31772 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31786 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35385 Référence CVE CVE-2026-39979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2026-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-015231LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。Bluetoothのhci_syncサブシステムにあるhci_le_big_create_sync関数内のスタックバッファオーバーフローの問題です。hci_le_big_create_sync()関数は、DEFINE_FLEXを使用してスタック上に0x11（17）個分のBISエントリを格納するstruct hci_cp_le_big_create_syncを割り当てています。しかし、conn-num_bisは最大HCI_MAX_ISO_BIS（31）個のエントリを保持可能であり、呼び出し元のhci_conn_big_create_sync()関数ではISO_MAX_NUM_BIS（0x1f）と照合されています。conn-num_bisが18から31の間の場合、conn-bisをcp-bisにコピーするmemcpyは、スタックバッファを最大14バイトも越えて書き込み、隣接するスタックメモリを破損します。この問題は簡単に再現可能であり、ISOソケットをbc_num_bis = ISO_MAX_NUM_BIS（31）でバインドし、listen()関数を呼び出すと、最終的にHCIコマンド同期ワーカーからhci_le_big_create_sync()がトリガーされ、KASANによって検出可能なスタック範囲外書き込みが発生します。バグの内容の例として、"BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hci_le_big_create_sync+0x256/0x3b0 Write of size 31 at addr ffffc90000487b48 by task kworker/u9:0/71"というエラーが報告されています。修正は、誤った0x11のDEFINE_FLEXのカウントを、conn-bisが実際に保持可能なBISエントリ最大数であるHCI_MAX_ISO_BISに変更することで行われました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.13, 6.12.81 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.22 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.12 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26585
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26585↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31772 · cve.blacktree.nl