BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31771High confidence

Bluetooth: hci_event: move wake reason storage into validated event handlers

Linux · Linux

8.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.31% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 22 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-31771 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 27 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-31771
17 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-obs-build
  • SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.2:kernel-syms
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Google
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_event: move wake reason storage into validated event handlers hci_store_wake_reason() is called from hci_event_packet() immediately after stripping the HCI event header but before hci_event_func() enforces the per-event minimum payload length from hci_ev_table. This means a short HCI event frame can reach bacpy() before any bounds check runs. Rather than duplicating skb parsing and per-event length checks inside hci_store_wake_reason(), move wake-address storage into the individual event handlers after their existing event-length validation has succeeded. Convert hci_store_wake_reason() into a small helper that only stores an already-validated bdaddr while the caller holds hci_dev_lock(). Use the same helper after hci_event_func() with a NULL address to preserve the existing unexpected-wake fallback semantics when no validated event handler records a wake address. Annotate the helper with __must_hold(&hdev->lock) and add lockdep_assert_held(&hdev->lock) so future call paths keep the lock contract explicit. Call the helper from hci_conn_request_evt(), hci_conn_complete_evt(), hci_sync_conn_complete_evt(), le_conn_complete_evt(), hci_le_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_ext_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_direct_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_pa_sync_established_evt(), and hci_le_past_received_evt().
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-26584

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_event: move wake reason storage into validated event handlers hci_store_wake_reason() is called from hci_event_packet() immediately after stripping the HCI event header but before hci_event_func() enforces the per-event minimum payload length from hci_ev_table. This means a short HCI event frame can reach bacpy() before any bounds check runs. Rather than duplicating skb parsing and per-event length checks inside hci_store_wake_reason(), move wake-address storage into the individual event handlers after their existing event-length validation has succeeded. Convert hci_store_wake_reason() into a small helper that only stores an already-validated bdaddr while the caller holds hci_dev_lock(). Use the same helper after hci_event_func() with a NULL address to preserve the existing unexpected-wake fallback semantics when no validated event handler records a wake address. Annotate the helper with __must_hold(&hdev->lock) and add lockdep_assert_held(&hdev->lock) so future call paths keep the lock contract explicit. Call the helper from hci_conn_request_evt(), hci_conn_complete_evt(), hci_sync_conn_complete_evt(), le_conn_complete_evt(), hci_le_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_ext_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_direct_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_pa_sync_established_evt(), and hci_le_past_received_evt().

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_event: move wake reason storage into validated event handlers hci_store_wake_reason() is called from hci_event_packet() immediately after stripping the HCI event header but before hci_event_func() enforces the per-event minimum payload length from hci_ev_table. This means a short HCI event frame can reach bacpy() before any bounds check runs. Rather than duplicating skb parsing and per-event length checks inside hci_store_wake_reason(), move wake-address storage into the individual event handlers after their existing event-length validation has succeeded. Convert hci_store_wake_reason() into a small helper that only stores an already-validated bdaddr while the caller holds hci_dev_lock(). Use the same helper after hci_event_func() with a NULL address to preserve the existing unexpected-wake fallback semantics when no validated event handler records a wake address. Annotate the helper with __must_hold(&hdev->lock) and add lockdep_assert_held(&hdev->lock) so future call paths keep the lock contract explicit. Call the helper from hci_conn_request_evt(), hci_conn_complete_evt(), hci_sync_conn_complete_evt(), le_conn_complete_evt(), hci_le_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_ext_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_direct_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_pa_sync_established_evt(), and hci_le_past_received_evt().

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_event: move wake reason storage into validated event handlers hci_store_wake_reason() is called from hci_event_packet() immediately after stripping the HCI event header but before hci_event_func() enforces the per-event minimum payload length from hci_ev_table. This means a short HCI event frame can reach bacpy() before any bounds check runs. Rather than duplicating skb parsing and per-event length checks inside hci_store_wake_reason(), move wake-address storage into the individual event handlers after their existing event-length validation has succeeded. Convert hci_store_wake_reason() into a small helper that only stores an already-validated bdaddr while the caller holds hci_dev_lock(). Use the same helper after hci_event_func() with a NULL address to preserve the existing unexpected-wake fallback semantics when no validated event handler records a wake address. Annotate the helper with __must_hold(&hdev->lock) and add lockdep_assert_held(&hdev->lock) so future call paths keep the lock contract explicit. Call the helper from hci_conn_request_evt(), hci_conn_complete_evt(), hci_sync_conn_complete_evt(), le_conn_complete_evt(), hci_le_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_ext_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_direct_adv_report_evt(), hci_le_pa_sync_established_evt(), and hci_le_past_received_evt().

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Unauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1346Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31486 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31568 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31663 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43048 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31673 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31674 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31680 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31693 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31738 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31743 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31752 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43010 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43014 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43015 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43019 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43022 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31755 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31756 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31761 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31762 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31763 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31765 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31768 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31770 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31773 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31776 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31778 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31779 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31780 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0900Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31580 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31592 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31677 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31680 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31773 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31781 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43036 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31694 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31752 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43010 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43022 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31694 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31752 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0807Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31678 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31694 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31759 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31767 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31774 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43023 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-015232LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。Bluetoothのhci_eventに関して、ウェイク理由の格納を検証済みイベントハンドラ内へ移動しました。hci_store_wake_reason()はHCIイベントヘッダの除去直後にhci_event_packet()から呼び出されますが、hci_event_func()がhci_ev_tableに基づくイベントごとの最小ペイロード長を強制する前に呼ばれます。このため、短いHCIイベントフレームが境界チェック前にbacpy()へ到達する可能性がありました。skb解析やイベントごとの長さチェックをhci_store_wake_reason()内で重複して行う代わりに、既存のイベント長検証後に各イベントハンドラ内でウェイクアドレスの格納を行うように変更しました。hci_store_wake_reason()は、hci_dev_lock()を保持している呼び出し側から既に検証済みのbdaddrを格納するだけの小さなヘルパー関数に変換しています。また、検証済みイベントハンドラがウェイクアドレスを記録しなかった場合の既存の予期しないウェイクのフォールバック動作を維持するために、hci_event_func()後にNULLアドレスで同じヘルパーを使用します。ヘルパー関数には__must_hold(&hdev-lock)注釈を付け、将来的な呼び出しパスでロック契約が明示されるようlockdep_assert_held(&hdev-lock)を追加しています。hci_conn_request_evt()、hci_conn_complete_evt()、hci_sync_conn_complete_evt()、le_conn_complete_evt()、hci_le_adv_report_evt()、hci_le_ext_adv_report_evt()、hci_le_direct_adv_report_evt()、hci_le_pa_sync_established_evt()、およびhci_le_past_received_evt()からこのヘルパーを呼び出します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.10, 6.19.12 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26584
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26584↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31771 · cve.blacktree.nl