BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31711High confidence

smb: server: fix active_num_conn leak on transport allocation failure

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 1.01% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-26520

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: server: fix active_num_conn leak on transport allocation failure Commit 77ffbcac4e56 ("smb: server: fix leak of active_num_conn in ksmbd_tcp_new_connection()") addressed the kthread_run() failure path. The earlier alloc_transport() == NULL path in the same function has the same leak, is reachable pre-authentication via any TCP connect to port 445, and was empirically reproduced on UML (ARCH=um, v7.0-rc7): a small number of forced allocation failures were sufficient to put ksmbd into a state where every subsequent connection attempt was rejected for the remainder of the boot. ksmbd_kthread_fn() increments active_num_conn before calling ksmbd_tcp_new_connection() and discards the return value, so when alloc_transport() returns NULL the socket is released and -ENOMEM returned without decrementing the counter. Each such failure permanently consumes one slot from the max_connections pool; once cumulative failures reach the cap, atomic_inc_return() hits the threshold on every subsequent accept and every new connection is rejected. The counter is only reset by module reload. An unauthenticated remote attacker can drive the server toward the memory pressure that makes alloc_transport() fail by holding open connections with large RFC1002 lengths up to MAX_STREAM_PROT_LEN (0x00FFFFFF); natural transient allocation failures on a loaded host produce the same drift more slowly. Mirror the existing rollback pattern in ksmbd_kthread_fn(): on the alloc_transport() failure path, decrement active_num_conn gated on server_conf.max_connections. Repro details: with the patch reverted, forced alloc_transport() NULL returns leaked counter slots and subsequent connection attempts -- including legitimate connects issued after the forced-fail window had closed -- were all rejected with "Limit the maximum number of connections". With this patch applied, the same connect sequence produces no rejections and the counter cycles cleanly between zero and one on every accept.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: server: fix active_num_conn leak on transport allocation failure Commit 77ffbcac4e56 ("smb: server: fix leak of active_num_conn in ksmbd_tcp_new_connection()") addressed the kthread_run() failure path. The earlier alloc_transport() == NULL path in the same function has the same leak, is reachable pre-authentication via any TCP connect to port 445, and was empirically reproduced on UML (ARCH=um, v7.0-rc7): a small number of forced allocation failures were sufficient to put ksmbd into a state where every subsequent connection attempt was rejected for the remainder of the boot. ksmbd_kthread_fn() increments active_num_conn before calling ksmbd_tcp_new_connection() and discards the return value, so when alloc_transport() returns NULL the socket is released and -ENOMEM returned without decrementing the counter. Each such failure permanently consumes one slot from the max_connections pool; once cumulative failures reach the cap, atomic_inc_return() hits the threshold on every subsequent accept and every new connection is rejected. The counter is only reset by module reload. An unauthenticated remote attacker can drive the server toward the memory pressure that makes alloc_transport() fail by holding open connections with large RFC1002 lengths up to MAX_STREAM_PROT_LEN (0x00FFFFFF); natural transient allocation failures on a loaded host produce the same drift more slowly. Mirror the existing rollback pattern in ksmbd_kthread_fn(): on the alloc_transport() failure path, decrement active_num_conn gated on server_conf.max_connections. Repro details: with the patch reverted, forced alloc_transport() NULL returns leaked counter slots and subsequent connection attempts -- including legitimate connects issued after the forced-fail window had closed -- were all rejected with "Limit the maximum number of connections". With this patch applied, the same connect sequence produces no rejections and the counter cycles cleanly between zero and one on every accept.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: server: fix active_num_conn leak on transport allocation failure Commit 77ffbcac4e56 ("smb: server: fix leak of active_num_conn in ksmbd_tcp_new_connection()") addressed the kthread_run() failure path. The earlier alloc_transport() == NULL path in the same function has the same leak, is reachable pre-authentication via any TCP connect to port 445, and was empirically reproduced on UML (ARCH=um, v7.0-rc7): a small number of forced allocation failures were sufficient to put ksmbd into a state where every subsequent connection attempt was rejected for the remainder of the boot. ksmbd_kthread_fn() increments active_num_conn before calling ksmbd_tcp_new_connection() and discards the return value, so when alloc_transport() returns NULL the socket is released and -ENOMEM returned without decrementing the counter. Each such failure permanently consumes one slot from the max_connections pool; once cumulative failures reach the cap, atomic_inc_return() hits the threshold on every subsequent accept and every new connection is rejected. The counter is only reset by module reload. An unauthenticated remote attacker can drive the server toward the memory pressure that makes alloc_transport() fail by holding open connections with large RFC1002 lengths up to MAX_STREAM_PROT_LEN (0x00FFFFFF); natural transient allocation failures on a loaded host produce the same drift more slowly. Mirror the existing rollback pattern in ksmbd_kthread_fn(): on the alloc_transport() failure path, decrement active_num_conn gated on server_conf.max_connections. Repro details: with the patch reverted, forced alloc_transport() NULL returns leaked counter slots and subsequent connection attempts -- including legitimate connects issued after the forced-fail window had closed -- were all rejected with "Limit the maximum number of connections". With this patch applied, the same connect sequence produces no rejections and the counter cycles cleanly between zero and one on every accept.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1346Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31720 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31721 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31722 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31717 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31717 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31732 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43010 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43052 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43058 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31717 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31717 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31694 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31696 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31697 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31698 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31699 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31700 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31702 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31704 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31705 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31708 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31711 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31721 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-43033 du 02 mai 2026 Une gestion de version détaillée se trouve à la fin de ce document. Risque Non spécifié par l'éditeur Systèmes affectés azl3 kernel versions antérieures à 6.6.137.1-1 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Microsoft. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014359LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:smbサーバのトランスポート割り当て失敗時に発生するactive_num_connのリークです。コミット77ffbcac4e56("smb: server: ksmbd_tcp_new_connection()内のactive_num_connリーク修正")はkthread_run()の失敗経路に対処しました。同じ関数内の以前のalloc_transport() == NULL経路にも同様のリークが存在し、これは認証前にTCPポート445への任意の接続で到達可能でした。UML(ARCH=um, v7.0-rc7)環境で経験的に再現されています。強制的な割り当て失敗が少数でも、ksmbdは起動後の残りの期間中に後続のすべての接続試行を拒否する状態になります。ksmbd_kthread_fn()はksmbd_tcp_new_connection()を呼び出す前にactive_num_connをインクリメントし、戻り値を破棄するため、alloc_transport()がNULLを返すとソケットは解放され-ENOMEMが返されますが、カウンタは減算されません。この失敗はそれぞれmax_connectionsプールからスロットを永続的に消費します。累積失敗がしきい値に達するとatomic_inc_return()は以降のすべてのacceptでしきい値に達し、新規接続はすべて拒否される状態になります。カウンタはモジュールの再読み込みによってのみリセットされます。未認証のリモート攻撃者は、大きなRFC1002長さ(MAX_STREAM_PROT_LEN(0x00FFFFFF)まで)の接続を保持することでalloc_transport()失敗を引き起こすメモリ圧力にサーバを追い込むことができます。負荷の高いホストでは自然な一時的割り当て失敗も同様の状態を遅れて引き起こす可能性があります。ksmbd_kthread_fn()内の既存のロールバックパターンに従い、alloc_transport()失敗経路ではserver_conf.max_connectionsにより制御される条件下でactive_num_connを減算します。再現詳細としては、パッチが戻された場合、強制的にalloc_transport()がNULLを返すことでカウンタースロットがリークし、強制失敗期間後に発行された正当な接続を含む後続の接続試行はすべて「接続数の最大制限」のため拒否されました。このパッチを適用すると同じ接続シーケンスで拒否は発生せず、カウンターはacceptごとにゼロと1の間できれいに循環します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 4210c3555db4b38bade92331b153e583261f05f9 < dc2e7d595d68cf1be1ba64e3d30ebf3266bf7242, d5d7847e57ac69fa99c18b363a34419bcdb5a281 < 60734c8bc3b4aa0672e251f08dda81977e4b5387, 0d0d4680db22eda1eea785c47bbf66a9b33a8b16 < 97f8d2648ef4871e4cd335e2d769cb40054a6772, 0d0d4680db22eda1eea785c47bbf66a9b33a8b16 < 295a9fc6789d1011c36ded9f0f2907bb34fa0de4, 0d0d4680db22eda1eea785c47bbf66a9b33a8b16 < 283027aa93380380a0994f35dde3ec95318f2654, 0d0d4680db22eda1eea785c47bbf66a9b33a8b16 < fb48185bcd946d42de7017cf27f912f8ab26acf0, 0d0d4680db22eda1eea785c47bbf66a9b33a8b16 < 6551300dc452ac16a855a83dbd1e74899542d3b3, 5.15.91 < 5.15.210, 6.1.9 < 6.1.175, 6.2
Fixed
Linux: < 6.2, 5.15.210 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.136 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.84 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.25 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.2 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26520
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31711 · cve.blacktree.nl