BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31707High confidence

ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg()

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-26516

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg() ipc_validate_msg() computes the expected message size for each response type by adding (or multiplying) attacker-controlled fields from the daemon response to a fixed struct size in unsigned int arithmetic. Three cases can overflow: KSMBD_EVENT_RPC_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_rpc_command) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config_response) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_login_response_ext) + resp->ngroups * sizeof(gid_t); resp->payload_sz is __u32 and resp->ngroups is __s32. Each addition can wrap in unsigned int; the multiplication by sizeof(gid_t) mixes signed and size_t, so a negative ngroups is converted to SIZE_MAX before the multiply. A wrapped value of msg_sz that happens to equal entry->msg_sz bypasses the size check on the next line, and downstream consumers (smb2pdu.c:6742 memcpy using rpc_resp->payload_sz, kmemdup in ksmbd_alloc_user using resp_ext->ngroups) then trust the unverified length. Use check_add_overflow() on the RPC_REQUEST and SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST paths to detect integer overflow without constraining functional payload size; userspace ksmbd-tools grows NDR responses in 4096-byte chunks for calls like NetShareEnumAll, so a hard transport cap is unworkable on the response side. For LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT, reject resp->ngroups outside the signed [0, NGROUPS_MAX] range up front and report the error from ipc_validate_msg() so it fires at the IPC boundary; with that bound the subsequent multiplication and addition stay well below UINT_MAX. The now-redundant ngroups check and pr_err in ksmbd_alloc_user() are removed. This is the response-side analogue of aab98e2dbd64 ("ksmbd: fix integer overflows on 32 bit systems"), which hardened the request side.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg() ipc_validate_msg() computes the expected message size for each response type by adding (or multiplying) attacker-controlled fields from the daemon response to a fixed struct size in unsigned int arithmetic. Three cases can overflow: KSMBD_EVENT_RPC_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_rpc_command) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config_response) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_login_response_ext) + resp->ngroups * sizeof(gid_t); resp->payload_sz is __u32 and resp->ngroups is __s32. Each addition can wrap in unsigned int; the multiplication by sizeof(gid_t) mixes signed and size_t, so a negative ngroups is converted to SIZE_MAX before the multiply. A wrapped value of msg_sz that happens to equal entry->msg_sz bypasses the size check on the next line, and downstream consumers (smb2pdu.c:6742 memcpy using rpc_resp->payload_sz, kmemdup in ksmbd_alloc_user using resp_ext->ngroups) then trust the unverified length. Use check_add_overflow() on the RPC_REQUEST and SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST paths to detect integer overflow without constraining functional payload size; userspace ksmbd-tools grows NDR responses in 4096-byte chunks for calls like NetShareEnumAll, so a hard transport cap is unworkable on the response side. For LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT, reject resp->ngroups outside the signed [0, NGROUPS_MAX] range up front and report the error from ipc_validate_msg() so it fires at the IPC boundary; with that bound the subsequent multiplication and addition stay well below UINT_MAX. The now-redundant ngroups check and pr_err in ksmbd_alloc_user() are removed. This is the response-side analogue of aab98e2dbd64 ("ksmbd: fix integer overflows on 32 bit systems"), which hardened the request side.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg() ipc_validate_msg() computes the expected message size for each response type by adding (or multiplying) attacker-controlled fields from the daemon response to a fixed struct size in unsigned int arithmetic. Three cases can overflow: KSMBD_EVENT_RPC_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_rpc_command) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config_response) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_login_response_ext) + resp->ngroups * sizeof(gid_t); resp->payload_sz is __u32 and resp->ngroups is __s32. Each addition can wrap in unsigned int; the multiplication by sizeof(gid_t) mixes signed and size_t, so a negative ngroups is converted to SIZE_MAX before the multiply. A wrapped value of msg_sz that happens to equal entry->msg_sz bypasses the size check on the next line, and downstream consumers (smb2pdu.c:6742 memcpy using rpc_resp->payload_sz, kmemdup in ksmbd_alloc_user using resp_ext->ngroups) then trust the unverified length. Use check_add_overflow() on the RPC_REQUEST and SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST paths to detect integer overflow without constraining functional payload size; userspace ksmbd-tools grows NDR responses in 4096-byte chunks for calls like NetShareEnumAll, so a hard transport cap is unworkable on the response side. For LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT, reject resp->ngroups outside the signed [0, NGROUPS_MAX] range up front and report the error from ipc_validate_msg() so it fires at the IPC boundary; with that bound the subsequent multiplication and addition stay well below UINT_MAX. The now-redundant ngroups check and pr_err in ksmbd_alloc_user() are removed. This is the response-side analogue of aab98e2dbd64 ("ksmbd: fix integer overflows on 32 bit systems"), which hardened the request side.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1346Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31716 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014363LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。ksmbdのipc_validate_msg()関数内でレスポンスサイズの検証を行います。ipc_validate_msg()は、攻撃者が制御可能なデーモンレスポンスのフィールドを固定構造体サイズに加算または乗算し、各レスポンスタイプの予想メッセージサイズを符号なし整数の算術で計算します。次の3つの場合にオーバーフローが発生する可能性があります。KSMBD_EVENT_RPC_REQUESTでは、msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_rpc_command) + resp-payload_szとなります。KSMBD_EVENT_SHARE_CONFIG_REQUESTでは、msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config_response) + resp-payload_szとなります。KSMBD_EVENT_LOGIN_REQUEST_EXTでは、msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_login_response_ext) + resp-ngroups * sizeof(gid_t)となります。resp-payload_szは__u32型、resp-ngroupsは__s32型です。各加算は符号なし整数でラップする可能性があり、sizeof(gid_t)との乗算は符号付きとsize_tの混用であるため、負のngroupsは乗算前にSIZE_MAXに変換されます。ラップしたmsg_szの値がたまたまentry-msg_szと等しい場合、次の行でのサイズチェックを回避し、下流の消費者(smb2pdu.c:6742のrpc_resp-payload_szを使うmemcpyやksmbd_alloc_userのkmemdupでresp_ext-ngroupsを使用)が未検証の長さを信用してしまいます。RPC_REQUESTおよびSHARE_CONFIG_REQUESTのパスにはcheck_add_overflow()を使用し、整数オーバーフローを検出しつつ機能的なペイロードサイズを制限しません。ユーザー空間のksmbd-toolsはNetShareEnumAllのような呼び出しでNDRレスポンスを4096バイト単位で増加させるため、レスポンス側でのハードな転送上限は不適切です。LOGIN_REQUEST_EXTについては、resp-ngroupsが符号付きの[0, NGROUPS_MAX]範囲外であれば受付けず、ipc_validate_msg()でエラーを報告してIPC境界で検出できるようにしています。この制限により乗算・加算はUINT_MAXを大幅に下回ります。今後は冗長となるngroupsチェックとksmbd_alloc_user()内のpr_errを削除します。これはリクエスト側を強化したaab98e2dbd64("ksmbd: 32ビットシステムでの整数オーバーフロー修正")のレスポンス側に対応した修正です。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf < bf396208418371174869baba9434535cd3288e80, 0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf < 7dd0c858e1909769a4c91842724315ee74f1a5f1, 0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf < 299db777ea0cfa5c407e41b045c24a14c034c27b, 0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf < 99c631d0366c1eab8fb188fe66425f4581ebdde4, 0626e6641f6b467447c81dd7678a69c66f7746cf < d6a6aa81eac2c9bff66dc6e191179cb69a14426b, 5.15
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 6.6.141 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.84 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.25 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.2 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26516
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31707 · cve.blacktree.nl