BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31706High confidence

ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl()

Linux · Linux

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.63% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.7.0.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-26515

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() smb_inherit_dacl() trusts the on-disk num_aces value from the parent directory's DACL xattr and uses it to size a heap allocation: aces_base = kmalloc(sizeof(struct smb_ace) * num_aces * 2, ...); num_aces is a u16 read from le16_to_cpu(parent_pdacl->num_aces) without checking that it is consistent with the declared pdacl_size. An authenticated client whose parent directory's security.NTACL is tampered (e.g. via offline xattr corruption or a concurrent path that bypasses parse_dacl()) can present num_aces = 65535 with minimal actual ACE data. This causes a ~8 MB allocation (not kzalloc, so uninitialized) that the subsequent loop only partially populates, and may also overflow the three-way size_t multiply on 32-bit kernels. Additionally, the ACE walk loop uses the weaker offsetof(struct smb_ace, access_req) minimum size check rather than the minimum valid on-wire ACE size, and does not reject ACEs whose declared size is below the minimum. Reproduced on UML + KASAN + LOCKDEP against the real ksmbd code path. A legitimate mount.cifs client creates a parent directory over SMB (ksmbd writes a valid security.NTACL xattr), then the NTACL blob on the backing filesystem is rewritten to set num_aces = 0xFFFF while keeping the posix_acl_hash bytes intact so ksmbd_vfs_get_sd_xattr()'s hash check still passes. A subsequent SMB2 CREATE of a child under that parent drives smb2_open() into smb_inherit_dacl() (share has "vfs objects = acl_xattr" set), which fails the page allocator: WARNING: mm/page_alloc.c:5226 at __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 ___kmalloc_large_node+0x68/0x130 __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x24/0x70 __kmalloc_noprof+0x4c9/0x690 smb_inherit_dacl+0x394/0x2430 smb2_open+0x595d/0xabe0 handle_ksmbd_work+0x3d3/0x1140 With the patch applied the added guard rejects the tampered value with -EINVAL before any large allocation runs, smb2_open() falls back to smb2_create_sd_buffer(), and the child is created with a default SD. No warning, no splat. Fix by: 1. Validating num_aces against pdacl_size using the same formula applied in parse_dacl(). 2. Replacing the raw kmalloc(sizeof * num_aces * 2) with kmalloc_array(num_aces * 2, sizeof(...)) for overflow-safe allocation. 3. Tightening the per-ACE loop guard to require the minimum valid ACE size (offsetof(smb_ace, sid) + CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE) and rejecting under-sized ACEs, matching the hardening in smb_check_perm_dacl() and parse_dacl(). v1 -> v2: - Replace the synthetic test-module splat in the changelog with a real-path UML + KASAN reproduction driven through mount.cifs and SMB2 CREATE; Namjae flagged the kcifs3_test_inherit_dacl_old name in v1 since it does not exist in ksmbd. - Drop the commit-hash citation from the code comment per Namjae's review; keep the parse_dacl() pointer.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() smb_inherit_dacl() trusts the on-disk num_aces value from the parent directory's DACL xattr and uses it to size a heap allocation: aces_base = kmalloc(sizeof(struct smb_ace) * num_aces * 2, ...); num_aces is a u16 read from le16_to_cpu(parent_pdacl->num_aces) without checking that it is consistent with the declared pdacl_size. An authenticated client whose parent directory's security.NTACL is tampered (e.g. via offline xattr corruption or a concurrent path that bypasses parse_dacl()) can present num_aces = 65535 with minimal actual ACE data. This causes a ~8 MB allocation (not kzalloc, so uninitialized) that the subsequent loop only partially populates, and may also overflow the three-way size_t multiply on 32-bit kernels. Additionally, the ACE walk loop uses the weaker offsetof(struct smb_ace, access_req) minimum size check rather than the minimum valid on-wire ACE size, and does not reject ACEs whose declared size is below the minimum. Reproduced on UML + KASAN + LOCKDEP against the real ksmbd code path. A legitimate mount.cifs client creates a parent directory over SMB (ksmbd writes a valid security.NTACL xattr), then the NTACL blob on the backing filesystem is rewritten to set num_aces = 0xFFFF while keeping the posix_acl_hash bytes intact so ksmbd_vfs_get_sd_xattr()'s hash check still passes. A subsequent SMB2 CREATE of a child under that parent drives smb2_open() into smb_inherit_dacl() (share has "vfs objects = acl_xattr" set), which fails the page allocator: WARNING: mm/page_alloc.c:5226 at __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 ___kmalloc_large_node+0x68/0x130 __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x24/0x70 __kmalloc_noprof+0x4c9/0x690 smb_inherit_dacl+0x394/0x2430 smb2_open+0x595d/0xabe0 handle_ksmbd_work+0x3d3/0x1140 With the patch applied the added guard rejects the tampered value with -EINVAL before any large allocation runs, smb2_open() falls back to smb2_create_sd_buffer(), and the child is created with a default SD. No warning, no splat. Fix by: 1. Validating num_aces against pdacl_size using the same formula applied in parse_dacl(). 2. Replacing the raw kmalloc(sizeof * num_aces * 2) with kmalloc_array(num_aces * 2, sizeof(...)) for overflow-safe allocation. 3. Tightening the per-ACE loop guard to require the minimum valid ACE size (offsetof(smb_ace, sid) + CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE) and rejecting under-sized ACEs, matching the hardening in smb_check_perm_dacl() and parse_dacl(). v1 -> v2: - Replace the synthetic test-module splat in the changelog with a real-path UML + KASAN reproduction driven through mount.cifs and SMB2 CREATE; Namjae flagged the kcifs3_test_inherit_dacl_old name in v1 since it does not exist in ksmbd. - Drop the commit-hash citation from the code comment per Namjae's review; keep the parse_dacl() pointer.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate num_aces and harden ACE walk in smb_inherit_dacl() smb_inherit_dacl() trusts the on-disk num_aces value from the parent directory's DACL xattr and uses it to size a heap allocation: aces_base = kmalloc(sizeof(struct smb_ace) * num_aces * 2, ...); num_aces is a u16 read from le16_to_cpu(parent_pdacl->num_aces) without checking that it is consistent with the declared pdacl_size. An authenticated client whose parent directory's security.NTACL is tampered (e.g. via offline xattr corruption or a concurrent path that bypasses parse_dacl()) can present num_aces = 65535 with minimal actual ACE data. This causes a ~8 MB allocation (not kzalloc, so uninitialized) that the subsequent loop only partially populates, and may also overflow the three-way size_t multiply on 32-bit kernels. Additionally, the ACE walk loop uses the weaker offsetof(struct smb_ace, access_req) minimum size check rather than the minimum valid on-wire ACE size, and does not reject ACEs whose declared size is below the minimum. Reproduced on UML + KASAN + LOCKDEP against the real ksmbd code path. A legitimate mount.cifs client creates a parent directory over SMB (ksmbd writes a valid security.NTACL xattr), then the NTACL blob on the backing filesystem is rewritten to set num_aces = 0xFFFF while keeping the posix_acl_hash bytes intact so ksmbd_vfs_get_sd_xattr()'s hash check still passes. A subsequent SMB2 CREATE of a child under that parent drives smb2_open() into smb_inherit_dacl() (share has "vfs objects = acl_xattr" set), which fails the page allocator: WARNING: mm/page_alloc.c:5226 at __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x46c/0x9c0 ___kmalloc_large_node+0x68/0x130 __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x24/0x70 __kmalloc_noprof+0x4c9/0x690 smb_inherit_dacl+0x394/0x2430 smb2_open+0x595d/0xabe0 handle_ksmbd_work+0x3d3/0x1140 With the patch applied the added guard rejects the tampered value with -EINVAL before any large allocation runs, smb2_open() falls back to smb2_create_sd_buffer(), and the child is created with a default SD. No warning, no splat. Fix by: 1. Validating num_aces against pdacl_size using the same formula applied in parse_dacl(). 2. Replacing the raw kmalloc(sizeof * num_aces * 2) with kmalloc_array(num_aces * 2, sizeof(...)) for overflow-safe allocation. 3. Tightening the per-ACE loop guard to require the minimum valid ACE size (offsetof(smb_ace, sid) + CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE) and rejecting under-sized ACEs, matching the hardening in smb_check_perm_dacl() and parse_dacl(). v1 -> v2: - Replace the synthetic test-module splat in the changelog with a real-path UML + KASAN reproduction driven through mount.cifs and SMB2 CREATE; Namjae flagged the kcifs3_test_inherit_dacl_old name in v1 since it does not exist in ksmbd. - Drop the commit-hash citation from the code comment per Namjae's review; keep the parse_dacl() pointer.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Network
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1346Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder Auswirkungen unbestimmter Art zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31696 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31715 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31697 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31698 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31699 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31701 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31702 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31703 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31704 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31706 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31707 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31710 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31711 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31713 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014364LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。ksmbdのsmb_inherit_dacl()関数内におけるnum_acesの検証とACEwalkの強化が行われました。smb_inherit_dacl()では、親ディレクトリのDACL xattrからオンディスクのnum_aces値を信用し、それを元にヒープ割り当てのサイズを決定していました。num_acesはle16_to_cpu(parent_pdacl-num_aces)からu16として読み取られますが、宣言されているpdacl_sizeとの整合性を検証していませんでした。認証されたクライアントは、親ディレクトリのsecurity.NTACLが改竄されている場合(例えば、オフラインでのxattr破損やparse_dacl()をバイパスするパスの同時操作により)、最小限の実際のACEデータしかない状態でnum_aces=65535を提示できます。これにより約8MBの割り当てが発生し(kzallocではないため初期化されていません)、後続のループは部分的にしかデータを埋めません。また、32ビットカーネルでは三方向のsize_t乗算オーバーフローを引き起こす可能性もありました。さらに、ACEの走査ループはoffsetof(struct smb_ace, access_req)という弱い最小サイズチェックを使用しており、ACEサイズが最小値未満の場合も拒否していませんでした。この問題はUML + KASAN + LOCKDEP環境にて実際のksmbdコード経路で再現されました。正規のmount.cifsクライアントがSMB経由で親ディレクトリを作成するとksmbdが有効なsecurity.NTACL xattrを書き込みますが、バックエンドファイルシステム上のNTACLバイナリが書き換えられ、num_acesが0xFFFFに設定されたもののposix_acl_hashが維持されているためksmbd_vfs_get_sd_xattr()のハッシュ検証は通過しました。その後のSMB2 CREATEで親の下に子が作成されると(シェアに"vfs objects = acl_xattr"が設定されている場合)、smb2_open()がsmb_inherit_dacl()を呼び出し、ページアロケータ失敗を引き起こします。パッチ適用後は、追加されたガードによって大きな割り当ての実行前に改竄された値を-EINVALで拒否し、smb2_open()はsmb2_create_sd_buffer()へフォールバックして子をデフォルトのSDで作成します。その結果、警告やクラッシュは発生しません。修正点は以下の通りです。1.num_acesをparse_dacl()で使用するのと同じ計算式でpdacl_sizeと照合して検証しました。2.オーバーフロー安全な割り当てのため、生のkmalloc(sizeof * num_aces * 2)をkmalloc_array(num_aces * 2, sizeof(...))に置き換えました。3.各ACEループのガードを強化し、有効な最小ACEサイズ(offsetof(smb_ace, sid) + CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE)を要求し、過小サイズのACEを拒否するようにしました。これによりsmb_check_perm_dacl()やparse_dacl()の強化と整合しました。v1からv2では、合成テストモジュールでの停止表示を実用的なUML + KASAN複製に置換し、mount.cifsとSMB2 CREATE経路での再現に変更しました。さらにNamjaeによるコードレビューに従い、コードコメントからコミットハッシュの記述を削除し、parse_dacl()の参照は保持しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < 063a7409b0de46d7c770b65bb0338e6fdb3b1f0a, e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < 3e5360b422dd741cb315654a191fa73869a37414, e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < 59c32abaaec9cdd6164811c7e864e72f7554b82d, e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < 3e4e2ea2a781018ed5d75f969e3e5606beb66e48, 5.15
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 6.12.84 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.25 ≤ 6.18.*, 7.0.2 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26515
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31706 · cve.blacktree.nl