BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31669High confidence

mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.82% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established The ehash table lookups are lockless and rely on SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to guarantee socket memory stability during RCU read-side critical sections. Both tcp_prot and tcpv6_prot have their slab caches created with this flag via proto_register(). However, MPTCP's mptcp_subflow_init() copies tcpv6_prot into tcpv6_prot_override during inet_init() (fs_initcall, level 5), before inet6_init() (module_init/device_initcall, level 6) has called proto_register(&tcpv6_prot). At that point, tcpv6_prot.slab is still NULL, so tcpv6_prot_override.slab remains NULL permanently. This causes MPTCP v6 subflow child sockets to be allocated via kmalloc (falling into kmalloc-4k) instead of the TCPv6 slab cache. The kmalloc-4k cache lacks SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so when these sockets are freed without SOCK_RCU_FREE (which is cleared for child sockets by design), the memory can be immediately reused. Concurrent ehash lookups under rcu_read_lock can then access freed memory, triggering a slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established. Fix this by splitting the IPv6-specific initialization out of mptcp_subflow_init() into a new mptcp_subflow_v6_init(), called from mptcp_proto_v6_init() before protocol registration. This ensures tcpv6_prot_override.slab correctly inherits the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established The ehash table lookups are lockless and rely on SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to guarantee socket memory stability during RCU read-side critical sections. Both tcp_prot and tcpv6_prot have their slab caches created with this flag via proto_register(). However, MPTCP's mptcp_subflow_init() copies tcpv6_prot into tcpv6_prot_override during inet_init() (fs_initcall, level 5), before inet6_init() (module_init/device_initcall, level 6) has called proto_register(&tcpv6_prot). At that point, tcpv6_prot.slab is still NULL, so tcpv6_prot_override.slab remains NULL permanently. This causes MPTCP v6 subflow child sockets to be allocated via kmalloc (falling into kmalloc-4k) instead of the TCPv6 slab cache. The kmalloc-4k cache lacks SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so when these sockets are freed without SOCK_RCU_FREE (which is cleared for child sockets by design), the memory can be immediately reused. Concurrent ehash lookups under rcu_read_lock can then access freed memory, triggering a slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established. Fix this by splitting the IPv6-specific initialization out of mptcp_subflow_init() into a new mptcp_subflow_v6_init(), called from mptcp_proto_v6_init() before protocol registration. This ensures tcpv6_prot_override.slab correctly inherits the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-25562

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established The ehash table lookups are lockless and rely on SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to guarantee socket memory stability during RCU read-side critical sections. Both tcp_prot and tcpv6_prot have their slab caches created with this flag via proto_register(). However, MPTCP's mptcp_subflow_init() copies tcpv6_prot into tcpv6_prot_override during inet_init() (fs_initcall, level 5), before inet6_init() (module_init/device_initcall, level 6) has called proto_register(&tcpv6_prot). At that point, tcpv6_prot.slab is still NULL, so tcpv6_prot_override.slab remains NULL permanently. This causes MPTCP v6 subflow child sockets to be allocated via kmalloc (falling into kmalloc-4k) instead of the TCPv6 slab cache. The kmalloc-4k cache lacks SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so when these sockets are freed without SOCK_RCU_FREE (which is cleared for child sockets by design), the memory can be immediately reused. Concurrent ehash lookups under rcu_read_lock can then access freed memory, triggering a slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established. Fix this by splitting the IPv6-specific initialization out of mptcp_subflow_init() into a new mptcp_subflow_v6_init(), called from mptcp_proto_v6_init() before protocol registration. This ensures tcpv6_prot_override.slab correctly inherits the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
9.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established The ehash table lookups are lockless and rely on SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to guarantee socket memory stability during RCU read-side critical sections. Both tcp_prot and tcpv6_prot have their slab caches created with this flag via proto_register(). However, MPTCP's mptcp_subflow_init() copies tcpv6_prot into tcpv6_prot_override during inet_init() (fs_initcall, level 5), before inet6_init() (module_init/device_initcall, level 6) has called proto_register(&tcpv6_prot). At that point, tcpv6_prot.slab is still NULL, so tcpv6_prot_override.slab remains NULL permanently. This causes MPTCP v6 subflow child sockets to be allocated via kmalloc (falling into kmalloc-4k) instead of the TCPv6 slab cache. The kmalloc-4k cache lacks SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so when these sockets are freed without SOCK_RCU_FREE (which is cleared for child sockets by design), the memory can be immediately reused. Concurrent ehash lookups under rcu_read_lock can then access freed memory, triggering a slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established. Fix this by splitting the IPv6-specific initialization out of mptcp_subflow_init() into a new mptcp_subflow_v6_init(), called from mptcp_proto_v6_init() before protocol registration. This ensures tcpv6_prot_override.slab correctly inherits the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established The ehash table lookups are lockless and rely on SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to guarantee socket memory stability during RCU read-side critical sections. Both tcp_prot and tcpv6_prot have their slab caches created with this flag via proto_register(). However, MPTCP's mptcp_subflow_init() copies tcpv6_prot into tcpv6_prot_override during inet_init() (fs_initcall, level 5), before inet6_init() (module_init/device_initcall, level 6) has called proto_register(&tcpv6_prot). At that point, tcpv6_prot.slab is still NULL, so tcpv6_prot_override.slab remains NULL permanently. This causes MPTCP v6 subflow child sockets to be allocated via kmalloc (falling into kmalloc-4k) instead of the TCPv6 slab cache. The kmalloc-4k cache lacks SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so when these sockets are freed without SOCK_RCU_FREE (which is cleared for child sockets by design), the memory can be immediately reused. Concurrent ehash lookups under rcu_read_lock can then access freed memory, triggering a slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established. Fix this by splitting the IPv6-specific initialization out of mptcp_subflow_init() into a new mptcp_subflow_v6_init(), called from mptcp_proto_v6_init() before protocol registration. This ensures tcpv6_prot_override.slab correctly inherits the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established The ehash table lookups are lockless and rely on SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to guarantee socket memory stability during RCU read-side critical sections. Both tcp_prot and tcpv6_prot have their slab caches created with this flag via proto_register(). However, MPTCP's mptcp_subflow_init() copies tcpv6_prot into tcpv6_prot_override during inet_init() (fs_initcall, level 5), before inet6_init() (module_init/device_initcall, level 6) has called proto_register(&tcpv6_prot). At that point, tcpv6_prot.slab is still NULL, so tcpv6_prot_override.slab remains NULL permanently. This causes MPTCP v6 subflow child sockets to be allocated via kmalloc (falling into kmalloc-4k) instead of the TCPv6 slab cache. The kmalloc-4k cache lacks SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so when these sockets are freed without SOCK_RCU_FREE (which is cleared for child sockets by design), the memory can be immediately reused. Concurrent ehash lookups under rcu_read_lock can then access freed memory, triggering a slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established. Fix this by splitting the IPv6-specific initialization out of mptcp_subflow_init() into a new mptcp_subflow_v6_init(), called from mptcp_proto_v6_init() before protocol registration. This ensures tcpv6_prot_override.slab correctly inherits the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25562Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established The ehash table lookups are lockless and rely on SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to guarantee socket memory stability during RCU read-side critical sections. Both tcp_prot and tcpv6_prot have their slab caches created with this flag via proto_register(). However, MPTCP's mptcp_subflow_init() copies tcpv6_prot into tcpv6_prot_override during inet_init() (fs_initcall, level 5), before inet6_init() (module_init/device_initcall, level 6) has called proto_register(&tcpv6_prot). At that point, tcpv6_prot.slab is still NULL, so tcpv6_prot_override.slab remains NULL permanently. This causes MPTCP v6 subflow child sockets to be allocated via kmalloc (falling into kmalloc-4k) instead of the TCPv6 slab cache. The kmalloc-4k cache lacks SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so when these sockets are freed without SOCK_RCU_FREE (which is cleared for child sockets by design), the memory can be immediately reused. Concurrent ehash lookups under rcu_read_lock can then access freed memory, triggering a slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established. Fix this by splitting the IPv6-specific initialization out of mptcp_subflow_init() into a new mptcp_subflow_v6_init(), called from mptcp_proto_v6_init() before protocol registration. This ensures tcpv6_prot_override.slab correctly inherits the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3623IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, erweiterte Berechtigungen zu erlangen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen oder Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1279Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0986Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

Record?id=CVE-2026-2482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-28390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28390 Référence CVE CVE-2026-29518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3012 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3039 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31581 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31684 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31786 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33870 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33871 Référence CVE CVE-2026-34477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31664 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31665 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31671 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31672 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31673 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31674 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31664 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31665 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31671 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31672 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31673 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31674 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0898Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43071 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

26-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31431, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31504, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31533, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-40355, CVE-2026-41989, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43033, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46300 et CVE-2026-46333. SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2026-54429 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0863Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23270 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31408 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35385 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35535 Référence CVE CVE-2026-39979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2026-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31686 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31687 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31693 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31694 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31696 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0832Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

ata/RHSA-2026:34927 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35385 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35535 Référence CVE CVE-2026-39979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2026-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31686 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31687 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31693 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31694 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0808Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

hat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26528 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:26542 du 25 juin 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26542 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:30129 du 25 juin 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31641 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31772 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31786 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35385 Référence CVE CVE-2026-39979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2026-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0781Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31786 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-35385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35385 Référence CVE CVE-2026-39979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2026-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2026-41326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31644 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31666 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31678 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31679 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31681 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31684 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31664 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31665 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31671 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31672 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31674 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31678 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31679 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31680 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31664 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31665 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31666 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31671 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31672 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31673 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31674 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31656 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31657 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31658 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31659 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31660 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31662 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31664 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31665 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31667 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31668 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31669 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31670 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31671 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31672 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31673 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31676 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31681 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31684 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31685 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31648 du 29 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31661 du 29 avril 2026 Bu

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013618LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。mptcpにおける__inet_lookup_establishedのslab-use-after-free問題が修正されました。ehashテーブルのルックアップはロックレスで行われ、RCUリードサイドクリティカルセクション中のソケットメモリの安定性を保証するためにSLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCUに依存しています。tcp_protおよびtcpv6_protはいずれもproto_register()を通じてこのフラグ付きでスラブキャッシュを作成します。しかし、MPTCPのmptcp_subflow_init()はinet_init()(fs_initcall、レベル5)中にtcpv6_protをtcpv6_prot_overrideにコピーしますが、inet6_init()(module_init/device_initcall、レベル6)がproto_register(&tcpv6_prot)を呼び出す前であるため、その時点でtcpv6_prot.slabはまだNULLであり、結果としてtcpv6_prot_override.slabは永続的にNULLのままになります。これにより、MPTCPのIPv6サブフロウの子ソケットはTCPv6スラブキャッシュではなくkmalloc(kmalloc-4kに該当)で割り当てられます。kmalloc-4kキャッシュはSLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCUを欠いているため、子ソケット用に設計上解除されているSOCK_RCU_FREEなしでこれらのソケットが解放されると、メモリが即座に再利用可能になります。その結果、rcu_read_lock下の同時ehashルックアップが解放済みメモリにアクセスし、__inet_lookup_establishedでslab-use-after-freeが発生します。この問題を修正するため、IPv6固有の初期化処理をmptcp_subflow_init()から新たなmptcp_subflow_v6_init()に分割し、プロトコル登録前にmptcp_proto_v6_init()から呼び出すようにしました。これによりtcpv6_prot_override.slabが正しくSLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCUスラブキャッシュを継承することが保証されます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.12, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Apr 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25562
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < f6e1f25fa5e733570f6d6fe37a4dfed2a0deba47; b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < fb1f54b7d16f393b8b65d328410f78b4beea8fcc; b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < 3fd6547f5b8ac99687be6d937a0321efda760597; b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < eb9c6aeb512f877cf397deb1e4526f646c70e4a7; b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < 15fa9ead4d5e6b6b9c794e84144146c917f2cb62; b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < b313e9037d98c13938740e5ebda7852929366dff; b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < 9b55b253907e7431210483519c5ad711a37dafa1; 5.12 · Fixed: < 5.12; 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*; 7.0 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < f6e1f25fa5e733570f6d6fe37a4dfed2a0deba47, b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < fb1f54b7d16f393b8b65d328410f78b4beea8fcc, b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < 3fd6547f5b8ac99687be6d937a0321efda760597, b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < eb9c6aeb512f877cf397deb1e4526f646c70e4a7, b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < 15fa9ead4d5e6b6b9c794e84144146c917f2cb62, b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < b313e9037d98c13938740e5ebda7852929366dff, b19bc2945b40b9fd38e835700907ffe8534ef0de < 9b55b253907e7431210483519c5ad711a37dafa1, 5.12 · Fixed: Linux: < 5.12, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31669 · cve.blacktree.nl