BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31649High confidence

net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.87% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes len = nopaged_len - bmax; where nopaged_len = skb_headlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUF_SIZE_8KiB or BUF_SIZE_2KiB. However, the caller stmmac_xmit() decides to invoke jumbo_frm() based on skb->len (total length including page fragments): is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb->len, enh_desc); When a packet has a small linear portion (nopaged_len len > bmax), the subtraction wraps as an unsigned integer, producing a huge len value (~0xFFFFxxxx). This causes the while (len != 0) loop to execute hundreds of thousands of iterations, passing skb->data + bmax * i pointers far beyond the skb buffer to dma_map_single(). On IOMMU-less SoCs (the typical deployment for stmmac), this maps arbitrary kernel memory to the DMA engine, constituting a kernel memory disclosure and potential memory corruption from hardware. Fix this by introducing a buf_len local variable clamped to min(nopaged_len, bmax). Computing len = nopaged_len - buf_len is then always safe: it is zero when the linear portion fits within a single descriptor, causing the while (len != 0) loop to be skipped naturally, and the fragment loop in stmmac_xmit() handles page fragments afterward.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes len = nopaged_len - bmax; where nopaged_len = skb_headlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUF_SIZE_8KiB or BUF_SIZE_2KiB. However, the caller stmmac_xmit() decides to invoke jumbo_frm() based on skb->len (total length including page fragments): is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb->len, enh_desc); When a packet has a small linear portion (nopaged_len len > bmax), the subtraction wraps as an unsigned integer, producing a huge len value (~0xFFFFxxxx). This causes the while (len != 0) loop to execute hundreds of thousands of iterations, passing skb->data + bmax * i pointers far beyond the skb buffer to dma_map_single(). On IOMMU-less SoCs (the typical deployment for stmmac), this maps arbitrary kernel memory to the DMA engine, constituting a kernel memory disclosure and potential memory corruption from hardware. Fix this by introducing a buf_len local variable clamped to min(nopaged_len, bmax). Computing len = nopaged_len - buf_len is then always safe: it is zero when the linear portion fits within a single descriptor, causing the while (len != 0) loop to be skipped naturally, and the fragment loop in stmmac_xmit() handles page fragments afterward.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-25542

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes len = nopaged_len - bmax; where nopaged_len = skb_headlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUF_SIZE_8KiB or BUF_SIZE_2KiB. However, the caller stmmac_xmit() decides to invoke jumbo_frm() based on skb->len (total length including page fragments): is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb->len, enh_desc); When a packet has a small linear portion (nopaged_len <= bmax) but a large total length due to page fragments (skb->len > bmax), the subtraction wraps as an unsigned integer, producing a huge len value (~0xFFFFxxxx). This causes the while (len != 0) loop to execute hundreds of thousands of iterations, passing skb->data + bmax * i pointers far beyond the skb buffer to dma_map_single(). On IOMMU-less SoCs (the typical deployment for stmmac), this maps arbitrary kernel memory to the DMA engine, constituting a kernel memory disclosure and potential memory corruption from hardware. Fix this by introducing a buf_len local variable clamped to min(nopaged_len, bmax). Computing len = nopaged_len - buf_len is then always safe: it is zero when the linear portion fits within a single descriptor, causing the while (len != 0) loop to be skipped naturally, and the fragment loop in stmmac_xmit() handles page fragments afterward.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
9.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes len = nopaged_len - bmax; where nopaged_len = skb_headlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUF_SIZE_8KiB or BUF_SIZE_2KiB. However, the caller stmmac_xmit() decides to invoke jumbo_frm() based on skb->len (total length including page fragments): is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb->len, enh_desc); When a packet has a small linear portion (nopaged_len <= bmax) but a large total length due to page fragments (skb->len > bmax), the subtraction wraps as an unsigned integer, producing a huge len value (~0xFFFFxxxx). This causes the while (len != 0) loop to execute hundreds of thousands of iterations, passing skb->data + bmax * i pointers far beyond the skb buffer to dma_map_single(). On IOMMU-less SoCs (the typical deployment for stmmac), this maps arbitrary kernel memory to the DMA engine, constituting a kernel memory disclosure and potential memory corruption from hardware. Fix this by introducing a buf_len local variable clamped to min(nopaged_len, bmax). Computing len = nopaged_len - buf_len is then always safe: it is zero when the linear portion fits within a single descriptor, causing the while (len != 0) loop to be skipped naturally, and the fragment loop in stmmac_xmit() handles page fragments afterward.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes len = nopaged_len - bmax; where nopaged_len = skb_headlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUF_SIZE_8KiB or BUF_SIZE_2KiB. However, the caller stmmac_xmit() decides to invoke jumbo_frm() based on skb->len (total length including page fragments): is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb->len, enh_desc); When a packet has a small linear portion (nopaged_len <= bmax) but a large total length due to page fragments (skb->len > bmax), the subtraction wraps as an unsigned integer, producing a huge len value (~0xFFFFxxxx). This causes the while (len != 0) loop to execute hundreds of thousands of iterations, passing skb->data + bmax * i pointers far beyond the skb buffer to dma_map_single(). On IOMMU-less SoCs (the typical deployment for stmmac), this maps arbitrary kernel memory to the DMA engine, constituting a kernel memory disclosure and potential memory corruption from hardware. Fix this by introducing a buf_len local variable clamped to min(nopaged_len, bmax). Computing len = nopaged_len - buf_len is then always safe: it is zero when the linear portion fits within a single descriptor, causing the while (len != 0) loop to be skipped naturally, and the fragment loop in stmmac_xmit() handles page fragments afterward.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes len = nopaged_len - bmax; where nopaged_len = skb_headlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUF_SIZE_8KiB or BUF_SIZE_2KiB. However, the caller stmmac_xmit() decides to invoke jumbo_frm() based on skb->len (total length including page fragments): is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb->len, enh_desc); When a packet has a small linear portion (nopaged_len <= bmax) but a large total length due to page fragments (skb->len > bmax), the subtraction wraps as an unsigned integer, producing a huge len value (~0xFFFFxxxx). This causes the while (len != 0) loop to execute hundreds of thousands of iterations, passing skb->data + bmax * i pointers far beyond the skb buffer to dma_map_single(). On IOMMU-less SoCs (the typical deployment for stmmac), this maps arbitrary kernel memory to the DMA engine, constituting a kernel memory disclosure and potential memory corruption from hardware. Fix this by introducing a buf_len local variable clamped to min(nopaged_len, bmax). Computing len = nopaged_len - buf_len is then always safe: it is zero when the linear portion fits within a single descriptor, causing the while (len != 0) loop to be skipped naturally, and the fragment loop in stmmac_xmit() handles page fragments afterward.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25542Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: fix integer underflow in chain mode The jumbo_frm() chain-mode implementation unconditionally computes len = nopaged_len - bmax; where nopaged_len = skb_headlen(skb) (linear bytes only) and bmax is BUF_SIZE_8KiB or BUF_SIZE_2KiB. However, the caller stmmac_xmit() decides to invoke jumbo_frm() based on skb->len (total length including page fragments): is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb->len, enh_desc); When a packet has a small linear portion (nopaged_len <= bmax) but a large total length due to page fragments (skb->len > bmax), the subtraction wraps as an unsigned integer, producing a huge len value (~0xFFFFxxxx). This causes the while (len != 0) loop to execute hundreds of thousands of iterations, passing skb->data + bmax * i pointers far beyond the skb buffer to dma_map_single(). On IOMMU-less SoCs (the typical deployment for stmmac), this maps arbitrary kernel memory to the DMA engine, constituting a kernel memory disclosure and potential memory corruption from hardware. Fix this by introducing a buf_len local variable clamped to min(nopaged_len, bmax). Computing len = nopaged_len - buf_len is then always safe: it is zero when the linear portion fits within a single descriptor, causing the while (len != 0) loop to be skipped naturally, and the fragment loop in stmmac_xmit() handles page fragments afterward.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1279Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31633 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31633 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31638 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31646 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31648 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31655 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1027Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31589 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31633 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31705 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43011 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31638 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31646 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31648 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31655 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31638 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31646 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31648 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31655 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0898Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

26-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31431, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31504, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31533, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-40355, CVE-2026-41989, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43033, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46300 et CVE-2026-46333. SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2026-54429 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31686 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31579 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31588 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31644 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31666 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31665 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0664Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31681 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31738 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31787 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31551 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31563 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31566 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31638 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31644 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31646 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31647 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31648 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31655 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31626 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31627 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31628 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31629 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31634 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31637 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31638 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31639 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31642 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31646 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31649 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31651 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31655 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31656 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31657 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31658 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31659 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31660 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31662 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31664 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31665 du 26 avril 2026 Bu

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013638LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:net: stmmac: チェーンモードにおける整数アンダーフローの修正です。jumbo_frm()のチェーンモード実装は無条件にlen = nopaged_len - bmax;を計算しています。ここで、nopaged_lenはskb_headlen(skb)(線形バイトのみ)を指し、bmaxはBUF_SIZE_8KiBまたはBUF_SIZE_2KiBです。しかし、呼び出し元のstmmac_xmit()はskb-len(ページフラグメントを含む全長)に基づきjumbo_frm()を呼び出すかどうかを決定しています:is_jumbo = stmmac_is_jumbo_frm(priv, skb-len, enh_desc); パケットの線形部分が小さい(nopaged_len = bmax)がページフラグメントにより全長が大きい場合(skb-len bmax)、引き算は符号なし整数でラップアラウンドし巨大なlen値(約0xFFFFxxxx)となります。これによりwhile (len != 0)ループが数十万回実行され、skb-data + bmax * iのポインタがskbバッファを大幅に超えてdma_map_single()に渡されます。IOMMU非搭載のSoC(stmmacの典型的な展開環境)では、これは任意のカーネルメモリをDMAエンジンにマップすることになり、カーネルメモリの情報漏洩およびハードウェアからの潜在的なメモリ破損を引き起こします。この問題はbuf_lenというローカル変数を導入し、min(nopaged_len, bmax)に制限することで修正しました。これによりlen = nopaged_len - buf_lenの計算は常に安全となります。線形部分が単一ディスクリプタに収まる場合はlenが0となり、while (len != 0)ループは自然にスキップされ、その後stmmac_xmit()内のフラグメントループがページフラグメントを処理します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.2, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Apr 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25542
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 513e06735f5be575b409d195822195348b164e48; 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 275bdf762e82082f064e60a92448fa2ac43cf95b; 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < a2b68a9a476b9544ff31f1fbcd5d80867a8a5e2f; 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < b7b8012193fd98236d7ae05d4b553f010a77b2ef; 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 2c91b39912278d0878f9ba60ba04d2518b18a08d; 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 6fca757c20396dc2e604dcc61922264e9e3dc803; 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 10d12b9240ebf96c785f0e2e4228318cd5f3a3eb; 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 51f4e090b9f87b40c21b6daadb5c06e6c0a07b67 · Fixed: < 3.2; 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*
    After
    Linux: 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 513e06735f5be575b409d195822195348b164e48, 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 275bdf762e82082f064e60a92448fa2ac43cf95b, 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < a2b68a9a476b9544ff31f1fbcd5d80867a8a5e2f, 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < b7b8012193fd98236d7ae05d4b553f010a77b2ef, 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 2c91b39912278d0878f9ba60ba04d2518b18a08d, 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 6fca757c20396dc2e604dcc61922264e9e3dc803, 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 10d12b9240ebf96c785f0e2e4228318cd5f3a3eb, 286a837217204b1ef105e3a554d0757e4fdfaac1 < 51f4e090b9f87b40c21b6daadb5c06e6c0a07b67, 3.2 · Fixed: Linux: < 3.2, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31649 · cve.blacktree.nl