BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31630High confidence

rxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-25523

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output The AF_RXRPC procfs helpers format local and remote socket addresses into fixed 50-byte stack buffers with "%pISpc". That is too small for the longest current-tree IPv6-with-port form the formatter can produce. In lib/vsprintf.c, the compressed IPv6 path uses a dotted-quad tail not only for v4mapped addresses, but also for ISATAP addresses via ipv6_addr_is_isatap(). As a result, a case such as [ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:0:5efe:255.255.255.255]:65535 is possible with the current formatter. That is 50 visible characters, so 51 bytes including the trailing NUL, which does not fit in the existing char[50] buffers used by net/rxrpc/proc.c. Size the buffers from the formatter's maximum textual form and switch the call sites to scnprintf(). Changes since v1: - correct the changelog to cite the actual maximum current-tree case explicitly - frame the proof around the ISATAP formatting path instead of the earlier mapped-v4 example

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output The AF_RXRPC procfs helpers format local and remote socket addresses into fixed 50-byte stack buffers with "%pISpc". That is too small for the longest current-tree IPv6-with-port form the formatter can produce. In lib/vsprintf.c, the compressed IPv6 path uses a dotted-quad tail not only for v4mapped addresses, but also for ISATAP addresses via ipv6_addr_is_isatap(). As a result, a case such as [ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:0:5efe:255.255.255.255]:65535 is possible with the current formatter. That is 50 visible characters, so 51 bytes including the trailing NUL, which does not fit in the existing char[50] buffers used by net/rxrpc/proc.c. Size the buffers from the formatter's maximum textual form and switch the call sites to scnprintf(). Changes since v1: - correct the changelog to cite the actual maximum current-tree case explicitly - frame the proof around the ISATAP formatting path instead of the earlier mapped-v4 example

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: proc: size address buffers for %pISpc output The AF_RXRPC procfs helpers format local and remote socket addresses into fixed 50-byte stack buffers with "%pISpc". That is too small for the longest current-tree IPv6-with-port form the formatter can produce. In lib/vsprintf.c, the compressed IPv6 path uses a dotted-quad tail not only for v4mapped addresses, but also for ISATAP addresses via ipv6_addr_is_isatap(). As a result, a case such as [ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:0:5efe:255.255.255.255]:65535 is possible with the current formatter. That is 50 visible characters, so 51 bytes including the trailing NUL, which does not fit in the existing char[50] buffers used by net/rxrpc/proc.c. Size the buffers from the formatter's maximum textual form and switch the call sites to scnprintf(). Changes since v1: - correct the changelog to cite the actual maximum current-tree case explicitly - frame the proof around the ISATAP formatting path instead of the earlier mapped-v4 example

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1279Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31619 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31486 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31568 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31663 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31771 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43009 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43042 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31619 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31633 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31619 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31660 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31661 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31621 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31638 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31621 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31638 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31618 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31619 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31624 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31625 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31626 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31627 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31630 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31642 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31664 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31673 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013657LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。rxrpcのprocfsでは、%pISpc出力用にサイズが指定されたアドレスバッファが使用されています。AF_RXRPCのprocfsヘルパーは、ローカルおよびリモートのソケットアドレスを"%pISpc"形式で固定の50バイトスタックバッファにフォーマットしていましたが、これは現在のツリーのIPv6+ポートの最長フォーマットに対して小さすぎました。lib/vsprintf.cでは、圧縮されたIPv6パスにおいて、v4マップドアドレスだけでなく、ipv6_addr_is_isatap()を介したISATAPアドレスにもドット四分割の末尾が使用されています。その結果、例えば[ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:0:5efe:255.255.255.255]:65535のようなケースが現在のフォーマッターで可能となっています。これは見た目で50文字であり、終端のNULを含めると51バイトになります。この長さはnet/rxrpc/proc.cで使用されている既存のchar[50]バッファには収まりません。フォーマッターの最大テキスト形式からバッファサイズを調整し、呼び出し元をscnprintf()に切り替えました。v1からの変更点は、実際の最大ケースを明示的に示す変更履歴の修正と、以前のv4マップド例ではなくISATAPフォーマットパス周辺での証明の枠組み化です。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 75b54cb57ca34cbe7a87c6ac757c55360a624590 < 386c86412608d3449006a318a662cbcd6ca1f668, 75b54cb57ca34cbe7a87c6ac757c55360a624590 < 235b2115de892eab2e107a42efa7a4347baaa80b, 75b54cb57ca34cbe7a87c6ac757c55360a624590 < 625af53a1564e31bb2df9adc3739df46137f46c1, 75b54cb57ca34cbe7a87c6ac757c55360a624590 < db297c78ce537c9ac96f0eda9b25ad72c8caefa9, 75b54cb57ca34cbe7a87c6ac757c55360a624590 < 10ebed83f9f6414af4e85bc85ffaeda7effdd874, 75b54cb57ca34cbe7a87c6ac757c55360a624590 < a44ce6aa2efb61fe44f2cfab72bb01544bbca272, 4.9
Fixed
Linux: < 4.9, 5.10.258 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Apr 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25523
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31630 · cve.blacktree.nl