BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31607High confidence

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit()

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.44% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.176-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-31607 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 20 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-31607
133 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() When a USB/IP client receives a RET_SUBMIT response, usbip_pack_ret_submit() unconditionally overwrites urb->number_of_packets from the network PDU. This value is subsequently used as the loop bound in usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() to iterate over urb->iso_frame_desc[], a flexible array whose size was fixed at URB allocation time based on the *original* number_of_packets from the CMD_SUBMIT. A malicious USB/IP server can set number_of_packets in the response to a value larger than what was originally submitted, causing a heap out-of-bounds write when usbip_recv_iso() writes to urb->iso_frame_desc[i] beyond the allocated region. KASAN confirmed this with kernel 7.0.0-rc5: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in usbip_recv_iso+0x46a/0x640 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888106351d40 by task vhci_rx/69 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 320-byte region [ffff888106351c00, ffff888106351d40) The server side (stub_rx.c) and gadget side (vudc_rx.c) already validate number_of_packets in the CMD_SUBMIT path since commits c6688ef9f297 ("usbip: fix stub_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input") and b78d830f0049 ("usbip: fix vudc_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input"). The server side validates against USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS because no URB exists yet at that point. On the client side we have the original URB, so we can use the tighter bound: the response must not exceed the original number_of_packets. This mirrors the existing validation of actual_length against transfer_buffer_length in usbip_recv_xbuff(), which checks the response value against the original allocation size. Kelvin Mbogo's series ("usb: usbip: fix integer overflow in usbip_recv_iso()", v2) hardens the receive-side functions themselves; this patch complements that work by catching the bad value at its source -- in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite -- and using the tighter per-URB allocation bound rather than the global USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS limit. Fix this by checking rpdu->number_of_packets against urb->number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite. On violation, clamp to zero so that usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() safely return early.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2026-31607 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit()
1,329 fixed

The vendor explicitly identifies these products or versions as containing the fix.

  • bpftool-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • bpftool-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • bpftool-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • bpftool-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • bpftool-debuginfo-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • bpftool-debuginfo-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • bpftool-debuginfo-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • bpftool-debuginfo-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • kernel-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • kernel-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • kernel-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
  • kernel-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el7.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's USB/IP subsystem. A malicious USB/IP server could exploit a vulnerability in the `usbip_pack_ret_submit()` function by sending a specially crafted `RET_SUBMIT` response. This response, containing an oversized `number_of_packets` value, could cause a heap out-of-bounds write. This issue may lead to a denial of service or potentially arbitrary code execution on the client system.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-25500

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() When a USB/IP client receives a RET_SUBMIT response, usbip_pack_ret_submit() unconditionally overwrites urb->number_of_packets from the network PDU. This value is subsequently used as the loop bound in usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() to iterate over urb->iso_frame_desc[], a flexible array whose size was fixed at URB allocation time based on the *original* number_of_packets from the CMD_SUBMIT. A malicious USB/IP server can set number_of_packets in the response to a value larger than what was originally submitted, causing a heap out-of-bounds write when usbip_recv_iso() writes to urb->iso_frame_desc[i] beyond the allocated region. KASAN confirmed this with kernel 7.0.0-rc5: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in usbip_recv_iso+0x46a/0x640 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888106351d40 by task vhci_rx/69 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 320-byte region [ffff888106351c00, ffff888106351d40) The server side (stub_rx.c) and gadget side (vudc_rx.c) already validate number_of_packets in the CMD_SUBMIT path since commits c6688ef9f297 ("usbip: fix stub_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input") and b78d830f0049 ("usbip: fix vudc_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input"). The server side validates against USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS because no URB exists yet at that point. On the client side we have the original URB, so we can use the tighter bound: the response must not exceed the original number_of_packets. This mirrors the existing validation of actual_length against transfer_buffer_length in usbip_recv_xbuff(), which checks the response value against the original allocation size. Kelvin Mbogo's series ("usb: usbip: fix integer overflow in usbip_recv_iso()", v2) hardens the receive-side functions themselves; this patch complements that work by catching the bad value at its source -- in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite -- and using the tighter per-URB allocation bound rather than the global USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS limit. Fix this by checking rpdu->number_of_packets against urb->number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite. On violation, clamp to zero so that usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() safely return early.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
9.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() When a USB/IP client receives a RET_SUBMIT response, usbip_pack_ret_submit() unconditionally overwrites urb->number_of_packets from the network PDU. This value is subsequently used as the loop bound in usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() to iterate over urb->iso_frame_desc[], a flexible array whose size was fixed at URB allocation time based on the *original* number_of_packets from the CMD_SUBMIT. A malicious USB/IP server can set number_of_packets in the response to a value larger than what was originally submitted, causing a heap out-of-bounds write when usbip_recv_iso() writes to urb->iso_frame_desc[i] beyond the allocated region. KASAN confirmed this with kernel 7.0.0-rc5: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in usbip_recv_iso+0x46a/0x640 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888106351d40 by task vhci_rx/69 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 320-byte region [ffff888106351c00, ffff888106351d40) The server side (stub_rx.c) and gadget side (vudc_rx.c) already validate number_of_packets in the CMD_SUBMIT path since commits c6688ef9f297 ("usbip: fix stub_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input") and b78d830f0049 ("usbip: fix vudc_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input"). The server side validates against USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS because no URB exists yet at that point. On the client side we have the original URB, so we can use the tighter bound: the response must not exceed the original number_of_packets. This mirrors the existing validation of actual_length against transfer_buffer_length in usbip_recv_xbuff(), which checks the response value against the original allocation size. Kelvin Mbogo's series ("usb: usbip: fix integer overflow in usbip_recv_iso()", v2) hardens the receive-side functions themselves; this patch complements that work by catching the bad value at its source -- in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite -- and using the tighter per-URB allocation bound rather than the global USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS limit. Fix this by checking rpdu->number_of_packets against urb->number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite. On violation, clamp to zero so that usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() safely return early.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() When a USB/IP client receives a RET_SUBMIT response, usbip_pack_ret_submit() unconditionally overwrites urb->number_of_packets from the network PDU. This value is subsequently used as the loop bound in usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() to iterate over urb->iso_frame_desc[], a flexible array whose size was fixed at URB allocation time based on the *original* number_of_packets from the CMD_SUBMIT. A malicious USB/IP server can set number_of_packets in the response to a value larger than what was originally submitted, causing a heap out-of-bounds write when usbip_recv_iso() writes to urb->iso_frame_desc[i] beyond the allocated region. KASAN confirmed this with kernel 7.0.0-rc5: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in usbip_recv_iso+0x46a/0x640 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888106351d40 by task vhci_rx/69 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 320-byte region [ffff888106351c00, ffff888106351d40) The server side (stub_rx.c) and gadget side (vudc_rx.c) already validate number_of_packets in the CMD_SUBMIT path since commits c6688ef9f297 ("usbip: fix stub_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input") and b78d830f0049 ("usbip: fix vudc_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input"). The server side validates against USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS because no URB exists yet at that point. On the client side we have the original URB, so we can use the tighter bound: the response must not exceed the original number_of_packets. This mirrors the existing validation of actual_length against transfer_buffer_length in usbip_recv_xbuff(), which checks the response value against the original allocation size. Kelvin Mbogo's series ("usb: usbip: fix integer overflow in usbip_recv_iso()", v2) hardens the receive-side functions themselves; this patch complements that work by catching the bad value at its source -- in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite -- and using the tighter per-URB allocation bound rather than the global USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS limit. Fix this by checking rpdu->number_of_packets against urb->number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite. On violation, clamp to zero so that usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() safely return early.

Why

The product uses a sequential operation to read or write a buffer, but it uses an incorrect length value that causes it to access memory that is outside of the bounds of the buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() When a USB/IP client receives a RET_SUBMIT response, usbip_pack_ret_submit() unconditionally overwrites urb->number_of_packets from the network PDU. This value is subsequently used as the loop bound in usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() to iterate over urb->iso_frame_desc[], a flexible array whose size was fixed at URB allocation time based on the *original* number_of_packets from the CMD_SUBMIT. A malicious USB/IP server can set number_of_packets in the response to a value larger than what was originally submitted, causing a heap out-of-bounds write when usbip_recv_iso() writes to urb->iso_frame_desc[i] beyond the allocated region. KASAN confirmed this with kernel 7.0.0-rc5: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in usbip_recv_iso+0x46a/0x640 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888106351d40 by task vhci_rx/69 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 320-byte region [ffff888106351c00, ffff888106351d40) The server side (stub_rx.c) and gadget side (vudc_rx.c) already validate number_of_packets in the CMD_SUBMIT path since commits c6688ef9f297 ("usbip: fix stub_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input") and b78d830f0049 ("usbip: fix vudc_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input"). The server side validates against USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS because no URB exists yet at that point. On the client side we have the original URB, so we can use the tighter bound: the response must not exceed the original number_of_packets. This mirrors the existing validation of actual_length against transfer_buffer_length in usbip_recv_xbuff(), which checks the response value against the original allocation size. Kelvin Mbogo's series ("usb: usbip: fix integer overflow in usbip_recv_iso()", v2) hardens the receive-side functions themselves; this patch complements that work by catching the bad value at its source -- in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite -- and using the tighter per-URB allocation bound rather than the global USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS limit. Fix this by checking rpdu->number_of_packets against urb->number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite. On violation, clamp to zero so that usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() safely return early.

Why

The product uses a sequential operation to read or write a buffer, but it uses an incorrect length value that causes it to access memory that is outside of the bounds of the buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-805 ↗

CWE-805: Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value. The product uses a sequential operation to read or write a buffer, but it uses an incorrect length value that causes it to access memory that is outside of the bounds of the buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-805
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25500Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() When a USB/IP client receives a RET_SUBMIT response, usbip_pack_ret_submit() unconditionally overwrites urb->number_of_packets from the network PDU. This value is subsequently used as the loop bound in usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() to iterate over urb->iso_frame_desc[], a flexible array whose size was fixed at URB allocation time based on the *original* number_of_packets from the CMD_SUBMIT. A malicious USB/IP server can set number_of_packets in the response to a value larger than what was originally submitted, causing a heap out-of-bounds write when usbip_recv_iso() writes to urb->iso_frame_desc[i] beyond the allocated region. KASAN confirmed this with kernel 7.0.0-rc5: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in usbip_recv_iso+0x46a/0x640 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888106351d40 by task vhci_rx/69 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 320-byte region [ffff888106351c00, ffff888106351d40) The server side (stub_rx.c) and gadget side (vudc_rx.c) already validate number_of_packets in the CMD_SUBMIT path since commits c6688ef9f297 ("usbip: fix stub_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input") and b78d830f0049 ("usbip: fix vudc_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input"). The server side validates against USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS because no URB exists yet at that point. On the client side we have the original URB, so we can use the tighter bound: the response must not exceed the original number_of_packets. This mirrors the existing validation of actual_length against transfer_buffer_length in usbip_recv_xbuff(), which checks the response value against the original allocation size. Kelvin Mbogo's series ("usb: usbip: fix integer overflow in usbip_recv_iso()", v2) hardens the receive-side functions themselves; this patch complements that work by catching the bad value at its source -- in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite -- and using the tighter per-URB allocation bound rather than the global USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS limit. Fix this by checking rpdu->number_of_packets against urb->number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite. On violation, clamp to zero so that usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() safely return early.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3623IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, erweiterte Berechtigungen zu erlangen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen oder Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1279Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31590 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31594 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31596 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31597 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31615 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31616 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31617 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31618 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31619 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31593 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31595 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31604 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31606 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31615 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31616 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31617 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31618 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31619 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31623 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1027Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-27558 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23272 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31589 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31633 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31636 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31600 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31601 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31604 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31606 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31608 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31609 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31610 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31611 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31612 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31614 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0928Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23168 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31684 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31600 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31601 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31604 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31606 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31608 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31609 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31610 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31611 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31612 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31614 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0898Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31635 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31637 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31657 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31659 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31668 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31594 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31595 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31596 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31597 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31611 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31612 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31615 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31616 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31617 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31618 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31600 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31601 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31604 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31606 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31608 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31609 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31610 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31611 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31612 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31614 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31600 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31601 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31604 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31606 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31608 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31609 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31610 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31611 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31612 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31614 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0747Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31581 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43037 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43056 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2026-31473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31568 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31575 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31614 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31629 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31729 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31736 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31758 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31547 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31579 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31588 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31622 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31644 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31656 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31662 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31666 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0664Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31681 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31685 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31700 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31738 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-31596 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31597 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31599 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31603 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31604 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31605 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31606 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31610 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31611 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31612 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31614 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31615 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31616 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31617 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31588 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31590 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31594 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31595 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31596 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31597 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31599 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31603 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31604 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31605 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31607 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31610 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31611 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31612 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31615 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31618 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31619 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31622 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31623 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31624 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31625 du 26 avril 2026 Bu

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013209LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、usbip_pack_ret_submit()でnumber_of_packetsの検証が不十分だったため、悪意のあるUSB/IPサーバが不正なnumber_of_packetsを送り、urb-iso_frame_desc配列にヒープバッファオーバーフローが発生する可能性がありました。この脆弱性は、usbip_pack_ret_submit()でレスポンスのnumber_of_packetsを元のURBのnumber_of_packetsと比較し、上限を制限することで修正されました。これにより、usbip_recv_iso()やusbip_pad_iso()での配列走査が安全になり、潜在的なバッファオーバーフローが防止されます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.39, 5.10.258 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.175 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.136 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.83 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.24 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.14 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0.1 ≤ 7.0.*, 7.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Apr 2026 · Last source change 21 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC · CWE-805 · Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25500
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceOther authority
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31607 · cve.blacktree.nl