BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31554High confidence

futex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-31554 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: futex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags
98 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. A local attacker could exploit a use-after-free vulnerability by calling the `sys_futex_requeue()` function with inconsistent flags. This could lead to a system crash, resulting in a denial of service, or potentially allow for privilege escalation.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect. Red Hat recommends treating all kernel errata as security-relevant. Given the kernel's fundamental role, any bug has a higher chance of impacting system security, even if that impact only becomes clear after a fix is published. Therefore, Red Hat prioritizes delivering fixes that improve our customers' overall security posture. Because of this proactive approach, a patch may be associated with a CVE assignment at a future date. Retroactive CVE assignments are always documented in the corresponding errata and on Red Hat's CVE pages. We strongly advise against delaying updates, as doing so may leave your system exposed when protections are already available.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-25447

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags Nicholas reported that his LLM found it was possible to create a UaF when sys_futex_requeue() is used with different flags. The initial motivation for allowing different flags was the variable sized futex, but since that hasn't been merged (yet), simply mandate the flags are identical, as is the case for the old style sys_futex() requeue operations.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags Nicholas reported that his LLM found it was possible to create a UaF when sys_futex_requeue() is used with different flags. The initial motivation for allowing different flags was the variable sized futex, but since that hasn't been merged (yet), simply mandate the flags are identical, as is the case for the old style sys_futex() requeue operations.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Require sys_futex_requeue() to have identical flags Nicholas reported that his LLM found it was possible to create a UaF when sys_futex_requeue() is used with different flags. The initial motivation for allowing different flags was the variable sized futex, but since that hasn't been merged (yet), simply mandate the flags are identical, as is the case for the old style sys_futex() requeue operations.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1279Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, welche zu einem Denial-of-Service-Zustand, einer Rechteausweitung, der Ausführung von Code oder einer Speicherbeschädigung führen könnten.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31551 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31556 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31557 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31563 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31566 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31551 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31556 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31557 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31563 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31566 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31551 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31556 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31557 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31563 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31566 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31590 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31592 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31593 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31596 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0833Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2026-31493 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-3150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31590 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31592 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31593 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31596 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31613 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31526 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31547 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31579 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31588 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31551 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31556 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31557 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31558 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31559 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31561 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31563 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013293LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。futex: sys_futex_requeue()が同一のフラグを持つことを要求します。Nicholasは、彼のLLMがsys_futex_requeue()が異なるフラグで使用された場合にUse-after-free(UaF)を引き起こす可能性があることを報告しました。異なるフラグを許容する初期の動機は可変サイズのfutexでしたが、それはまだマージされていないため、旧式のsys_futex()のrequeue操作と同様にフラグを同一にすることを単純に義務付けました。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6950Linux 제품 보안 업데이트 권고

Linux 커널에서 발생하는 Use After Free 취약점(CVE-2026-31554) [1][2]

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Apr 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25447
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31554 · cve.blacktree.nl