BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31533High confidence

net/tls: fix use-after-free in -EBUSY error path of tls_do_encryption

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.71% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: fix use-after-free in -EBUSY error path of tls_do_encryption The -EBUSY handling in tls_do_encryption(), introduced by commit 859054147318 ("net: tls: handle backlogging of crypto requests"), has a use-after-free due to double cleanup of encrypt_pending and the scatterlist entry. When crypto_aead_encrypt() returns -EBUSY, the request is enqueued to the cryptd backlog and the async callback tls_encrypt_done() will be invoked upon completion. That callback unconditionally restores the scatterlist entry (sge->offset, sge->length) and decrements ctx->encrypt_pending. However, if tls_encrypt_async_wait() returns an error, the synchronous error path in tls_do_encryption() performs the same cleanup again, double-decrementing encrypt_pending and double-restoring the scatterlist. The double-decrement corrupts the encrypt_pending sentinel (initialized to 1), making tls_encrypt_async_wait() permanently skip the wait for pending async callbacks. A subsequent sendmsg can then free the tls_rec via bpf_exec_tx_verdict() while a cryptd callback is still pending, resulting in a use-after-free when the callback fires on the freed record. Fix this by skipping the synchronous cleanup when the -EBUSY async wait returns an error, since the callback has already handled encrypt_pending and sge restoration.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: fix use-after-free in -EBUSY error path of tls_do_encryption The -EBUSY handling in tls_do_encryption(), introduced by commit 859054147318 ("net: tls: handle backlogging of crypto requests"), has a use-after-free due to double cleanup of encrypt_pending and the scatterlist entry. When crypto_aead_encrypt() returns -EBUSY, the request is enqueued to the cryptd backlog and the async callback tls_encrypt_done() will be invoked upon completion. That callback unconditionally restores the scatterlist entry (sge->offset, sge->length) and decrements ctx->encrypt_pending. However, if tls_encrypt_async_wait() returns an error, the synchronous error path in tls_do_encryption() performs the same cleanup again, double-decrementing encrypt_pending and double-restoring the scatterlist. The double-decrement corrupts the encrypt_pending sentinel (initialized to 1), making tls_encrypt_async_wait() permanently skip the wait for pending async callbacks. A subsequent sendmsg can then free the tls_rec via bpf_exec_tx_verdict() while a cryptd callback is still pending, resulting in a use-after-free when the callback fires on the freed record. Fix this by skipping the synchronous cleanup when the -EBUSY async wait returns an error, since the callback has already handled encrypt_pending and sge restoration.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-25249

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: fix use-after-free in -EBUSY error path of tls_do_encryption The -EBUSY handling in tls_do_encryption(), introduced by commit 859054147318 ("net: tls: handle backlogging of crypto requests"), has a use-after-free due to double cleanup of encrypt_pending and the scatterlist entry. When crypto_aead_encrypt() returns -EBUSY, the request is enqueued to the cryptd backlog and the async callback tls_encrypt_done() will be invoked upon completion. That callback unconditionally restores the scatterlist entry (sge->offset, sge->length) and decrements ctx->encrypt_pending. However, if tls_encrypt_async_wait() returns an error, the synchronous error path in tls_do_encryption() performs the same cleanup again, double-decrementing encrypt_pending and double-restoring the scatterlist. The double-decrement corrupts the encrypt_pending sentinel (initialized to 1), making tls_encrypt_async_wait() permanently skip the wait for pending async callbacks. A subsequent sendmsg can then free the tls_rec via bpf_exec_tx_verdict() while a cryptd callback is still pending, resulting in a use-after-free when the callback fires on the freed record. Fix this by skipping the synchronous cleanup when the -EBUSY async wait returns an error, since the callback has already handled encrypt_pending and sge restoration.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
9.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: fix use-after-free in -EBUSY error path of tls_do_encryption The -EBUSY handling in tls_do_encryption(), introduced by commit 859054147318 ("net: tls: handle backlogging of crypto requests"), has a use-after-free due to double cleanup of encrypt_pending and the scatterlist entry. When crypto_aead_encrypt() returns -EBUSY, the request is enqueued to the cryptd backlog and the async callback tls_encrypt_done() will be invoked upon completion. That callback unconditionally restores the scatterlist entry (sge->offset, sge->length) and decrements ctx->encrypt_pending. However, if tls_encrypt_async_wait() returns an error, the synchronous error path in tls_do_encryption() performs the same cleanup again, double-decrementing encrypt_pending and double-restoring the scatterlist. The double-decrement corrupts the encrypt_pending sentinel (initialized to 1), making tls_encrypt_async_wait() permanently skip the wait for pending async callbacks. A subsequent sendmsg can then free the tls_rec via bpf_exec_tx_verdict() while a cryptd callback is still pending, resulting in a use-after-free when the callback fires on the freed record. Fix this by skipping the synchronous cleanup when the -EBUSY async wait returns an error, since the callback has already handled encrypt_pending and sge restoration.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: fix use-after-free in -EBUSY error path of tls_do_encryption The -EBUSY handling in tls_do_encryption(), introduced by commit 859054147318 ("net: tls: handle backlogging of crypto requests"), has a use-after-free due to double cleanup of encrypt_pending and the scatterlist entry. When crypto_aead_encrypt() returns -EBUSY, the request is enqueued to the cryptd backlog and the async callback tls_encrypt_done() will be invoked upon completion. That callback unconditionally restores the scatterlist entry (sge->offset, sge->length) and decrements ctx->encrypt_pending. However, if tls_encrypt_async_wait() returns an error, the synchronous error path in tls_do_encryption() performs the same cleanup again, double-decrementing encrypt_pending and double-restoring the scatterlist. The double-decrement corrupts the encrypt_pending sentinel (initialized to 1), making tls_encrypt_async_wait() permanently skip the wait for pending async callbacks. A subsequent sendmsg can then free the tls_rec via bpf_exec_tx_verdict() while a cryptd callback is still pending, resulting in a use-after-free when the callback fires on the freed record. Fix this by skipping the synchronous cleanup when the -EBUSY async wait returns an error, since the callback has already handled encrypt_pending and sge restoration.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: fix use-after-free in -EBUSY error path of tls_do_encryption The -EBUSY handling in tls_do_encryption(), introduced by commit 859054147318 ("net: tls: handle backlogging of crypto requests"), has a use-after-free due to double cleanup of encrypt_pending and the scatterlist entry. When crypto_aead_encrypt() returns -EBUSY, the request is enqueued to the cryptd backlog and the async callback tls_encrypt_done() will be invoked upon completion. That callback unconditionally restores the scatterlist entry (sge->offset, sge->length) and decrements ctx->encrypt_pending. However, if tls_encrypt_async_wait() returns an error, the synchronous error path in tls_do_encryption() performs the same cleanup again, double-decrementing encrypt_pending and double-restoring the scatterlist. The double-decrement corrupts the encrypt_pending sentinel (initialized to 1), making tls_encrypt_async_wait() permanently skip the wait for pending async callbacks. A subsequent sendmsg can then free the tls_rec via bpf_exec_tx_verdict() while a cryptd callback is still pending, resulting in a use-after-free when the callback fires on the freed record. Fix this by skipping the synchronous cleanup when the -EBUSY async wait returns an error, since the callback has already handled encrypt_pending and sge restoration.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25249Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/tls: fix use-after-free in -EBUSY error path of tls_do_encryption The -EBUSY handling in tls_do_encryption(), introduced by commit 859054147318 ("net: tls: handle backlogging of crypto requests"), has a use-after-free due to double cleanup of encrypt_pending and the scatterlist entry. When crypto_aead_encrypt() returns -EBUSY, the request is enqueued to the cryptd backlog and the async callback tls_encrypt_done() will be invoked upon completion. That callback unconditionally restores the scatterlist entry (sge->offset, sge->length) and decrements ctx->encrypt_pending. However, if tls_encrypt_async_wait() returns an error, the synchronous error path in tls_do_encryption() performs the same cleanup again, double-decrementing encrypt_pending and double-restoring the scatterlist. The double-decrement corrupts the encrypt_pending sentinel (initialized to 1), making tls_encrypt_async_wait() permanently skip the wait for pending async callbacks. A subsequent sendmsg can then free the tls_rec via bpf_exec_tx_verdict() while a cryptd callback is still pending, resulting in a use-after-free when the callback fires on the freed record. Fix this by skipping the synchronous cleanup when the -EBUSY async wait returns an error, since the callback has already handled encrypt_pending and sge restoration.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1265Linux Kernel: Schwachstelle ermöglicht nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, einschließlich der Ausführung von beliebigem Code, der Manipulation von Speicherinhalten oder der Verursachung eines Denial-of-Service-Zustands.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31560 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31580 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31596 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31646 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31511 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31513 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31520 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31522 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31551 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31552 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0900Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68324 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31462 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31580 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31592 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31677 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31680 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

26-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-27135, CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31431, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31504, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31533, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-40355, CVE-2026-41989, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43033, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46300 et CVE-2026-46333. SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Adva

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31574 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31575 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31576 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31577 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31578 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31579 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31580 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31411 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31436 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31574 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31575 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31576 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31577 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31578 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31579 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31580 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0806Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

e sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-8388-2 du 22 juin 2026 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8388-2 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-8461-1 du 22 juin 2026 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8461-1 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-8462-1 du 22 juin 2026 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8462-1 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-45998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0746Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31526 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31547 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31579 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31586 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0695Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23454 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43078 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43276 Gestion détaillée du document le 29 mai 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43078 Gestion détaillée du document le 22 mai 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des sys

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31520 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31522 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31551 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-31522 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31527 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31531 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31549 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31672 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31673 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31676 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31681 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31684 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31685 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31648 du 29 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31661 du 29 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31689 du 29 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31508 du 30 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31533 du 01 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31694 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31696 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31697 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31698 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31699 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31700 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31702 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31704 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31705 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31708 du 02 mai 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Mic

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013235LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルのnet/tlsにおいて、tls_do_encryptionの-EBUSYエラーパスで発生するuse-after-freeの脆弱性が修正されました。この問題は、crypto_aead_encrypt()が-EBUSYを返した際に、非同期コールバックtls_encrypt_done()と同期的なクリーンアップ処理がencrypt_pendingを二重にデクリメントし、scatterlistの復元が二重に行われることで発生しました。その結果、encrypt_pendingの管理が破損し、後続の処理で解放済みのリソースにアクセスするuse-after-freeが引き起こされました。本問題は、-EBUSYの非同期待機がエラーを返した場合に同期的なクリーンアップ処理をスキップすることで修正されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.8, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 23 Apr 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-25249
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    3ade391adc584f17b5570fd205de3ad029090368 < 414fc5e5a5aff776c150f1b86770e0a25a35df3a; cd1bbca03f3c1d845ce274c0d0a66de8e5929f72 < 02f3ecadb23558bbe068e6504118f1b712d4ece0; 13eca403876bbea3716e82cdfe6f1e6febb38754 < 0e43e0a3c94044acc74b8e0927c27972eb5a59e8; 8590541473188741055d27b955db0777569438e3 < aa9facde6c5005205874c37db3fd25799d741baf; 8590541473188741055d27b955db0777569438e3 < 5d70eb25b41e9b010828cd12818b06a0c3b04412; 8590541473188741055d27b955db0777569438e3 < 2694d408b0e595024e0fc1d64ff9db0358580f74; 8590541473188741055d27b955db0777569438e3 < a9b8b18364fffce4c451e6f6fd218fa4ab646705; ab6397f072e5097f267abf5cb08a8004e6b17694 · Fixed: < 6.8; 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*; 7.0 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 3ade391adc584f17b5570fd205de3ad029090368 < 414fc5e5a5aff776c150f1b86770e0a25a35df3a, cd1bbca03f3c1d845ce274c0d0a66de8e5929f72 < 02f3ecadb23558bbe068e6504118f1b712d4ece0, 13eca403876bbea3716e82cdfe6f1e6febb38754 < 0e43e0a3c94044acc74b8e0927c27972eb5a59e8, 8590541473188741055d27b955db0777569438e3 < aa9facde6c5005205874c37db3fd25799d741baf, 8590541473188741055d27b955db0777569438e3 < 5d70eb25b41e9b010828cd12818b06a0c3b04412, 8590541473188741055d27b955db0777569438e3 < 2694d408b0e595024e0fc1d64ff9db0358580f74, 8590541473188741055d27b955db0777569438e3 < a9b8b18364fffce4c451e6f6fd218fa4ab646705, ab6397f072e5097f267abf5cb08a8004e6b17694, 5.15.160 < 5.15.203, 6.1.84 < 6.1.169, 6.6.18 < 6.6.135, 6.7.6 < 6.8, 6.8 · Fixed: Linux: < 6.8, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.169 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.135 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.82 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.23 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.13 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31533 · cve.blacktree.nl