BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31528High confidence

perf: Make sure to use pmu_ctx->pmu for groups

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-24921

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Make sure to use pmu_ctx->pmu for groups Oliver reported that x86_pmu_del() ended up doing an out-of-bound memory access when group_sched_in() fails and needs to roll back. This *should* be handled by the transaction callbacks, but he found that when the group leader is a software event, the transaction handlers of the wrong PMU are used. Despite the move_group case in perf_event_open() and group_sched_in() using pmu_ctx->pmu. Turns out, inherit uses event->pmu to clone the events, effectively undoing the move_group case for all inherited contexts. Fix this by also making inherit use pmu_ctx->pmu, ensuring all inherited counters end up in the same pmu context. Similarly, __perf_event_read() should use equally use pmu_ctx->pmu for the group case.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Make sure to use pmu_ctx->pmu for groups Oliver reported that x86_pmu_del() ended up doing an out-of-bound memory access when group_sched_in() fails and needs to roll back. This *should* be handled by the transaction callbacks, but he found that when the group leader is a software event, the transaction handlers of the wrong PMU are used. Despite the move_group case in perf_event_open() and group_sched_in() using pmu_ctx->pmu. Turns out, inherit uses event->pmu to clone the events, effectively undoing the move_group case for all inherited contexts. Fix this by also making inherit use pmu_ctx->pmu, ensuring all inherited counters end up in the same pmu context. Similarly, __perf_event_read() should use equally use pmu_ctx->pmu for the group case.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Make sure to use pmu_ctx->pmu for groups Oliver reported that x86_pmu_del() ended up doing an out-of-bound memory access when group_sched_in() fails and needs to roll back. This *should* be handled by the transaction callbacks, but he found that when the group leader is a software event, the transaction handlers of the wrong PMU are used. Despite the move_group case in perf_event_open() and group_sched_in() using pmu_ctx->pmu. Turns out, inherit uses event->pmu to clone the events, effectively undoing the move_group case for all inherited contexts. Fix this by also making inherit use pmu_ctx->pmu, ensuring all inherited counters end up in the same pmu context. Similarly, __perf_event_read() should use equally use pmu_ctx->pmu for the group case.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1252Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und möglicherweise Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31520 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31522 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31527 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31520 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31522 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31527 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31520 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31522 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31527 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31548 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31526 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31547 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31550 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31554 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31579 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31520 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31522 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31527 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31531 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31532 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31542 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31545 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0519Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Linux

sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31510 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31515 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31518 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31519 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31520 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31521 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31522 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31523 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31524 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31525 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31528 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-41989 du 24 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23360 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23414 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31555 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31565 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31566 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31570 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31589 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31591 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31593 du 26 avril 2026 Bu

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013240LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。perfでは、グループに対してpmu_ctx-pmuを確実に使用するようにしました。Oliverは、group_sched_in()が失敗してロールバックが必要な場合にx86_pmu_del()が境界外のメモリアクセスを行ってしまうことを報告しました。この問題はトランザクションコールバックで処理されるべきですが、グループリーダーがソフトウェアイベントの場合に誤ったPMUのトランザクションハンドラが使用されていることが判明しました。perf_event_open()のmove_groupケースやgroup_sched_in()がpmu_ctx-pmuを使用しているにもかかわらず問題が発生していました。実際には、inheritがイベントをクローンする際にevent-pmuを使用していたため、継承されたすべてのコンテキストに対してmove_groupケースが無効になっていました。これを修正するために、inheritもpmu_ctx-pmuを使用し、すべての継承カウンタが同じpmuコンテキストに属するようにしました。これと同様に、__perf_event_read()もグループの場合にpmu_ctx-pmuを使用するようにしました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b < 656f35b463995bee024d948440128230aacd81e1, bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b < 3a696e84a8b1fafdd774bb30d62919faf844d9e4, bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b < 35f7914e54fe7f13654c22ee045b05e4b6d8062b, bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b < 4c759446046500a1a6785b25725725c3ff087ace, bd27568117664b8b3e259721393df420ed51f57b < 4b9ce671960627b2505b3f64742544ae9801df97, 6.2
Fixed
Linux: < 6.2, 6.6.131 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.21 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.11 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Apr 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-24921
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31528 · cve.blacktree.nl