BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31507High confidence

net/smc: fix double-free of smc_spd_priv when tee() duplicates splice pipe buffer

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix double-free of smc_spd_priv when tee() duplicates splice pipe buffer smc_rx_splice() allocates one smc_spd_priv per pipe_buffer and stores the pointer in pipe_buffer.private. The pipe_buf_operations for these buffers used .get = generic_pipe_buf_get, which only increments the page reference count when tee(2) duplicates a pipe buffer. The smc_spd_priv pointer itself was not handled, so after tee() both the original and the cloned pipe_buffer share the same smc_spd_priv *. When both pipes are subsequently released, smc_rx_pipe_buf_release() is called twice against the same object: 1st call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [correct] 2nd call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [UAF] KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release(), which then escalates to a NULL-pointer dereference and kernel panic via smc_rx_update_consumer() when it chases the freed priv->smc pointer: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004a45740 by task smc_splice_tee_/74 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 print_report+0xce/0x650 kasan_report+0xc6/0x100 smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 RIP: 0010:smc_rx_update_consumer+0x8d/0x350 Call Trace: smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x121/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Beyond the memory-safety problem, duplicating an SMC splice buffer is semantically questionable: smc_rx_update_cons() would advance the consumer cursor twice for the same data, corrupting receive-window accounting. A refcount on smc_spd_priv could fix the double-free, but the cursor-accounting issue would still need to be addressed separately. The .get callback is invoked by both tee(2) and splice_pipe_to_pipe() for partial transfers; both will now return -EFAULT. Users who need to duplicate SMC socket data must use a copy-based read path.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix double-free of smc_spd_priv when tee() duplicates splice pipe buffer smc_rx_splice() allocates one smc_spd_priv per pipe_buffer and stores the pointer in pipe_buffer.private. The pipe_buf_operations for these buffers used .get = generic_pipe_buf_get, which only increments the page reference count when tee(2) duplicates a pipe buffer. The smc_spd_priv pointer itself was not handled, so after tee() both the original and the cloned pipe_buffer share the same smc_spd_priv *. When both pipes are subsequently released, smc_rx_pipe_buf_release() is called twice against the same object: 1st call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [correct] 2nd call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [UAF] KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release(), which then escalates to a NULL-pointer dereference and kernel panic via smc_rx_update_consumer() when it chases the freed priv->smc pointer: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004a45740 by task smc_splice_tee_/74 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 print_report+0xce/0x650 kasan_report+0xc6/0x100 smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 RIP: 0010:smc_rx_update_consumer+0x8d/0x350 Call Trace: smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x121/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Beyond the memory-safety problem, duplicating an SMC splice buffer is semantically questionable: smc_rx_update_cons() would advance the consumer cursor twice for the same data, corrupting receive-window accounting. A refcount on smc_spd_priv could fix the double-free, but the cursor-accounting issue would still need to be addressed separately. The .get callback is invoked by both tee(2) and splice_pipe_to_pipe() for partial transfers; both will now return -EFAULT. Users who need to duplicate SMC socket data must use a copy-based read path.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-24885

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix double-free of smc_spd_priv when tee() duplicates splice pipe buffer smc_rx_splice() allocates one smc_spd_priv per pipe_buffer and stores the pointer in pipe_buffer.private. The pipe_buf_operations for these buffers used .get = generic_pipe_buf_get, which only increments the page reference count when tee(2) duplicates a pipe buffer. The smc_spd_priv pointer itself was not handled, so after tee() both the original and the cloned pipe_buffer share the same smc_spd_priv *. When both pipes are subsequently released, smc_rx_pipe_buf_release() is called twice against the same object: 1st call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [correct] 2nd call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [UAF] KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release(), which then escalates to a NULL-pointer dereference and kernel panic via smc_rx_update_consumer() when it chases the freed priv->smc pointer: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004a45740 by task smc_splice_tee_/74 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 print_report+0xce/0x650 kasan_report+0xc6/0x100 smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 RIP: 0010:smc_rx_update_consumer+0x8d/0x350 Call Trace: <TASK> smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x121/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Beyond the memory-safety problem, duplicating an SMC splice buffer is semantically questionable: smc_rx_update_cons() would advance the consumer cursor twice for the same data, corrupting receive-window accounting. A refcount on smc_spd_priv could fix the double-free, but the cursor-accounting issue would still need to be addressed separately. The .get callback is invoked by both tee(2) and splice_pipe_to_pipe() for partial transfers; both will now return -EFAULT. Users who need to duplicate SMC socket data must use a copy-based read path.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix double-free of smc_spd_priv when tee() duplicates splice pipe buffer smc_rx_splice() allocates one smc_spd_priv per pipe_buffer and stores the pointer in pipe_buffer.private. The pipe_buf_operations for these buffers used .get = generic_pipe_buf_get, which only increments the page reference count when tee(2) duplicates a pipe buffer. The smc_spd_priv pointer itself was not handled, so after tee() both the original and the cloned pipe_buffer share the same smc_spd_priv *. When both pipes are subsequently released, smc_rx_pipe_buf_release() is called twice against the same object: 1st call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [correct] 2nd call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [UAF] KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release(), which then escalates to a NULL-pointer dereference and kernel panic via smc_rx_update_consumer() when it chases the freed priv->smc pointer: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004a45740 by task smc_splice_tee_/74 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 print_report+0xce/0x650 kasan_report+0xc6/0x100 smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 RIP: 0010:smc_rx_update_consumer+0x8d/0x350 Call Trace: <TASK> smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x121/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Beyond the memory-safety problem, duplicating an SMC splice buffer is semantically questionable: smc_rx_update_cons() would advance the consumer cursor twice for the same data, corrupting receive-window accounting. A refcount on smc_spd_priv could fix the double-free, but the cursor-accounting issue would still need to be addressed separately. The .get callback is invoked by both tee(2) and splice_pipe_to_pipe() for partial transfers; both will now return -EFAULT. Users who need to duplicate SMC socket data must use a copy-based read path.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix double-free of smc_spd_priv when tee() duplicates splice pipe buffer smc_rx_splice() allocates one smc_spd_priv per pipe_buffer and stores the pointer in pipe_buffer.private. The pipe_buf_operations for these buffers used .get = generic_pipe_buf_get, which only increments the page reference count when tee(2) duplicates a pipe buffer. The smc_spd_priv pointer itself was not handled, so after tee() both the original and the cloned pipe_buffer share the same smc_spd_priv *. When both pipes are subsequently released, smc_rx_pipe_buf_release() is called twice against the same object: 1st call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [correct] 2nd call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [UAF] KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release(), which then escalates to a NULL-pointer dereference and kernel panic via smc_rx_update_consumer() when it chases the freed priv->smc pointer: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004a45740 by task smc_splice_tee_/74 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 print_report+0xce/0x650 kasan_report+0xc6/0x100 smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 RIP: 0010:smc_rx_update_consumer+0x8d/0x350 Call Trace: <TASK> smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x121/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Beyond the memory-safety problem, duplicating an SMC splice buffer is semantically questionable: smc_rx_update_cons() would advance the consumer cursor twice for the same data, corrupting receive-window accounting. A refcount on smc_spd_priv could fix the double-free, but the cursor-accounting issue would still need to be addressed separately. The .get callback is invoked by both tee(2) and splice_pipe_to_pipe() for partial transfers; both will now return -EFAULT. Users who need to duplicate SMC socket data must use a copy-based read path.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix double-free of smc_spd_priv when tee() duplicates splice pipe buffer smc_rx_splice() allocates one smc_spd_priv per pipe_buffer and stores the pointer in pipe_buffer.private. The pipe_buf_operations for these buffers used .get = generic_pipe_buf_get, which only increments the page reference count when tee(2) duplicates a pipe buffer. The smc_spd_priv pointer itself was not handled, so after tee() both the original and the cloned pipe_buffer share the same smc_spd_priv *. When both pipes are subsequently released, smc_rx_pipe_buf_release() is called twice against the same object: 1st call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [correct] 2nd call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [UAF] KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release(), which then escalates to a NULL-pointer dereference and kernel panic via smc_rx_update_consumer() when it chases the freed priv->smc pointer: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004a45740 by task smc_splice_tee_/74 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 print_report+0xce/0x650 kasan_report+0xc6/0x100 smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 RIP: 0010:smc_rx_update_consumer+0x8d/0x350 Call Trace: <TASK> smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x121/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Beyond the memory-safety problem, duplicating an SMC splice buffer is semantically questionable: smc_rx_update_cons() would advance the consumer cursor twice for the same data, corrupting receive-window accounting. A refcount on smc_spd_priv could fix the double-free, but the cursor-accounting issue would still need to be addressed separately. The .get callback is invoked by both tee(2) and splice_pipe_to_pipe() for partial transfers; both will now return -EFAULT. Users who need to duplicate SMC socket data must use a copy-based read path.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Double Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-415 ↗

CWE-415: Double Free. The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-415
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-24885Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix double-free of smc_spd_priv when tee() duplicates splice pipe buffer smc_rx_splice() allocates one smc_spd_priv per pipe_buffer and stores the pointer in pipe_buffer.private. The pipe_buf_operations for these buffers used .get = generic_pipe_buf_get, which only increments the page reference count when tee(2) duplicates a pipe buffer. The smc_spd_priv pointer itself was not handled, so after tee() both the original and the cloned pipe_buffer share the same smc_spd_priv *. When both pipes are subsequently released, smc_rx_pipe_buf_release() is called twice against the same object: 1st call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [correct] 2nd call: kfree(priv) sock_put(sk) smc_rx_update_cons() [UAF] KASAN reports a slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release(), which then escalates to a NULL-pointer dereference and kernel panic via smc_rx_update_consumer() when it chases the freed priv->smc pointer: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004a45740 by task smc_splice_tee_/74 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 print_report+0xce/0x650 kasan_report+0xc6/0x100 smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x78/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 RIP: 0010:smc_rx_update_consumer+0x8d/0x350 Call Trace: <TASK> smc_rx_pipe_buf_release+0x121/0x2a0 free_pipe_info+0xd4/0x130 pipe_release+0x142/0x160 __fput+0x1c6/0x490 __x64_sys_close+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xa6/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Beyond the memory-safety problem, duplicating an SMC splice buffer is semantically questionable: smc_rx_update_cons() would advance the consumer cursor twice for the same data, corrupting receive-window accounting. A refcount on smc_spd_priv could fix the double-free, but the cursor-accounting issue would still need to be addressed separately. The .get callback is invoked by both tee(2) and splice_pipe_to_pipe() for partial transfers; both will now return -EFAULT. Users who need to duplicate SMC socket data must use a copy-based read path.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1252Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und möglicherweise Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31486 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31489 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31506 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31489 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31511 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31489 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31506 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31511 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31506 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31511 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

26-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-27135, CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31431, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31504, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31533, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-40355, CVE-2026-41989, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43033, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31453 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31456 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31526 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31528 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0664Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-31416 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31423 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31424 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31524 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31602 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31607 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31675 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31519 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-31496 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31497 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31498 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31500 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31506 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31509 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31510 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31511 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31512 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31516 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0519Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Linux

sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31476 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31483 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31485 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31494 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31495 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31496 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31497 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31500 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31503 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31504 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31507 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31509 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31510 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31515 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31518 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31519 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31520 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31521 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31522 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31523 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31524 du 23 avril 2026 Bu

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013399LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける二重解放に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。net/smc: tee()がspliceパイプバッファを複製するときにsmc_spd_privの二重解放を修正しました。smc_rx_splice()はパイプバッファごとに1つのsmc_spd_privを割り当て、そのポインタをpipe_buffer.privateに格納しています。これらのバッファのpipe_buf_operationsは.get=generic_pipe_buf_getを使用しており、tee(2)がパイプバッファを複製した際にはページ参照カウントのみを増加させました。しかし、smc_spd_privポインタ自体は適切に扱われなかったため、tee()後に元のパイプバッファと複製されたパイプバッファが同じsmc_spd_priv *を共有してしまいます。両方のパイプが後で解放される際、smc_rx_pipe_buf_release()が同じオブジェクトに対して2回呼び出されます。1回目ではkfree(priv)、sock_put(sk)、smc_rx_update_cons()が正常に処理され、2回目ではkfree(priv)、sock_put(sk)、smc_rx_update_cons()が使用後の解放(UAF)を引き起こします。KASANはsmc_rx_pipe_buf_release()内でslab-use-after-freeを報告し、その後解放済みのpriv-smcポインタを参照してNULLポインタデリファレンスとカーネルパニックが発生しました。メモリ安全性の問題だけでなく、SMCスプライスバッファを複製することは意味論的にも問題があります。smc_rx_update_cons()は同じデータに対して2回コンシューマカーソルを進めてしまい、受信ウィンドウの管理が破綻します。smc_spd_privの参照カウントは二重解放を防げますが、カーソルの管理問題は別途対応が必要です。.getコールバックはtee(2)とsplice_pipe_to_pipe()の両方で部分転送に対して呼ばれるため、両者とも現在は-EFAULTを返します。SMCソケットデータを複製する必要があるユーザーは、コピーに基づく読み取りパスを使用する必要があります。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.18, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.131 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.21 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.11 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Apr 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC · CWE-415 · Double Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-24885
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 7e8916f46c2f48607f907fd401590093753a6bc5; 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < ae5575e660410c8d2c5d38fb28a0f37aea945676; 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 98ba5cb274768146e25ffbfde47753652c1c20d3; 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 81acbd345d405994875d419d43b319fee0b9ad62; 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 7bcb974c771c863e8588cea0012ac204443a7126; 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 54c87a730157868543ebdfa0ecb21b4590ed23a5; 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 3cc76380fea749280c026f410af56a28aaac388a; 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 24dd586bb4cbba1889a50abe74143817a095c1c9 · Fixed: < 4.18; 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.131 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.21 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19.11 ≤ 6.19.*
    After
    Linux: 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 7e8916f46c2f48607f907fd401590093753a6bc5, 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < ae5575e660410c8d2c5d38fb28a0f37aea945676, 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 98ba5cb274768146e25ffbfde47753652c1c20d3, 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 81acbd345d405994875d419d43b319fee0b9ad62, 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 7bcb974c771c863e8588cea0012ac204443a7126, 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 54c87a730157868543ebdfa0ecb21b4590ed23a5, 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 3cc76380fea749280c026f410af56a28aaac388a, 9014db202cb764b8e14c53e7bacc81f9a1a2ba7f < 24dd586bb4cbba1889a50abe74143817a095c1c9, 4.18 · Fixed: Linux: < 4.18, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.131 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.21 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.11 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31507 · cve.blacktree.nl