BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-31477High confidence

ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock()

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.68% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-24833

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock() smb2_lock() has three error handling issues after list_del() detaches smb_lock from lock_list at no_check_cl: 1) If vfs_lock_file() returns an unexpected error in the non-UNLOCK path, goto out leaks smb_lock and its flock because the out: handler only iterates lock_list and rollback_list, neither of which contains the detached smb_lock. 2) If vfs_lock_file() returns -ENOENT in the UNLOCK path, goto out leaks smb_lock and flock for the same reason. The error code returned to the dispatcher is also stale. 3) In the rollback path, smb_flock_init() can return NULL on allocation failure. The result is dereferenced unconditionally, causing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check to prevent the crash and clean up the bookkeeping; the VFS lock itself cannot be rolled back without the allocation and will be released at file or connection teardown. Fix cases 1 and 2 by hoisting the locks_free_lock()/kfree() to before the if(!rc) check in the UNLOCK branch so all exit paths share one free site, and by freeing smb_lock and flock before goto out in the non-UNLOCK branch. Propagate the correct error code in both cases. Fix case 3 by wrapping the VFS unlock in an if(rlock) guard and adding a NULL check for locks_free_lock(rlock) in the shared cleanup. Found via call-graph analysis using sqry.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock() smb2_lock() has three error handling issues after list_del() detaches smb_lock from lock_list at no_check_cl: 1) If vfs_lock_file() returns an unexpected error in the non-UNLOCK path, goto out leaks smb_lock and its flock because the out: handler only iterates lock_list and rollback_list, neither of which contains the detached smb_lock. 2) If vfs_lock_file() returns -ENOENT in the UNLOCK path, goto out leaks smb_lock and flock for the same reason. The error code returned to the dispatcher is also stale. 3) In the rollback path, smb_flock_init() can return NULL on allocation failure. The result is dereferenced unconditionally, causing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check to prevent the crash and clean up the bookkeeping; the VFS lock itself cannot be rolled back without the allocation and will be released at file or connection teardown. Fix cases 1 and 2 by hoisting the locks_free_lock()/kfree() to before the if(!rc) check in the UNLOCK branch so all exit paths share one free site, and by freeing smb_lock and flock before goto out in the non-UNLOCK branch. Propagate the correct error code in both cases. Fix case 3 by wrapping the VFS unlock in an if(rlock) guard and adding a NULL check for locks_free_lock(rlock) in the shared cleanup. Found via call-graph analysis using sqry.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix memory leaks and NULL deref in smb2_lock() smb2_lock() has three error handling issues after list_del() detaches smb_lock from lock_list at no_check_cl: 1) If vfs_lock_file() returns an unexpected error in the non-UNLOCK path, goto out leaks smb_lock and its flock because the out: handler only iterates lock_list and rollback_list, neither of which contains the detached smb_lock. 2) If vfs_lock_file() returns -ENOENT in the UNLOCK path, goto out leaks smb_lock and flock for the same reason. The error code returned to the dispatcher is also stale. 3) In the rollback path, smb_flock_init() can return NULL on allocation failure. The result is dereferenced unconditionally, causing a kernel NULL pointer dereference. Add a NULL check to prevent the crash and clean up the bookkeeping; the VFS lock itself cannot be rolled back without the allocation and will be released at file or connection teardown. Fix cases 1 and 2 by hoisting the locks_free_lock()/kfree() to before the if(!rc) check in the UNLOCK branch so all exit paths share one free site, and by freeing smb_lock and flock before goto out in the non-UNLOCK branch. Propagate the correct error code in both cases. Fix case 3 by wrapping the VFS unlock in an if(rlock) guard and adding a NULL check for locks_free_lock(rlock) in the shared cleanup. Found via call-graph analysis using sqry.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1252Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und möglicherweise Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260429Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Apr 2026, published on 29 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31487 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31489 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31487 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-31458 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31487 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31488 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-31453 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31454 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31492 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-31462 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31464 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31466 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31467 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31470 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31473 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31474 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31477 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31478 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31480 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31487 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-013304LinuxのLinux KernelにおけるNULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。ksmbdのsmb2_lock()関数におけるメモリリークおよびNULL参照の問題を修正しました。smb2_lock()では、no_check_clでlist_del()がsmb_lockをlock_listから切り離した後に、3つのエラー処理問題が存在していました。まず、非UNLOCKパスにおいてvfs_lock_file()が予期しないエラーを返した場合、goto outによってsmb_lockおよびそのflockがリークしていました。これはout:ハンドラがlock_listとrollback_listのみをイテレートし、切り離されたsmb_lockを含んでいなかったためです。次に、UNLOCKパスでvfs_lock_file()が-ENOENTを返した場合も同様に、goto outによってsmb_lockとflockがリークし、ディスパッチャに返されるエラーコードも古いままでした。最後に、ロールバックパスでsmb_flock_init()が割り当て失敗によりNULLを返すことがあり、その戻り値が無条件に参照されたため、カーネルのNULLポインタ参照が発生していました。クラッシュを防ぐためにNULLチェックを追加し、管理情報を適切にクリーンアップしています。割り当てがない場合、VFSロック自体はロールバックできず、ファイルまたは接続の終了時に解放されます。ケース1および2については、UNLOCKブランチのif(!rc)チェックの前にlocks_free_lock()やkfree()を移動させ、すべての終了パスが1つの解放箇所を共有するように修正しました。また、非UNLOCKブランチではgoto outの前にsmb_lockとflockを解放するようにしています。さらに、両ケースで正しいエラーコードを伝播させるようにしています。ケース3は、VFSアンロックをif(rlock)でガードし、共通のクリーンアップ処理内でlocks_free_lock(rlock)のNULLチェックを追加して修正しました。この脆弱性はsqryを用いたコールグラフ解析で発見されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < cdac6f7e7e428dc70e3b5898ac6999a72ed13993, e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < c9b95ef6f5039f19e46c3a521a4fe1752d91dfe9, e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < 91aeaa7256006d79a37298f5a1df23325db91599, e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < 3cdacd11b41569ce75b3162142240f2355e04900, e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < aab42f0795620cf0d3955a520f571f697d0f9a2a, e2f34481b24db2fd634b5edb0a5bd0e4d38cc6e9 < 309b44ed684496ed3f9c5715d10b899338623512, 5.15
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.131 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.21 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.11 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Apr 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-24833
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-31477 · cve.blacktree.nl