BlackTreeIndependent security intelligenceLinux · Linux
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
| Ubuntu release | Source package | Vendor state | Fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-aws-6.14 | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-azure-6.11 | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-gcp-6.11 | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-hwe-6.11 | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11 | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-nvidia-6.11 | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-oem-6.11 | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-oracle-6.14 | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-raspi-realtime | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-realtime | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
| Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archive | linux-riscv | Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition. | Not published in this feed | Canonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026 |
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Patch availableIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/rmap: fix incorrect pte restoration for lazyfree folios We batch unmap anonymous lazyfree folios by folio_unmap_pte_batch. If the batch has a mix of writable and non-writable bits, we may end up setting the entire batch writable. Fix this by respecting writable bit during batching. Although on a successful unmap of a lazyfree folio, the soft-dirty bit is lost, preserve it on pte restoration by respecting the bit during batching, to make the fix consistent w.r.t both writable bit and soft-dirty bit. I was able to write the below reproducer and crash the kernel. Explanation of reproducer (set 64K mTHP to always): Fault in a 64K large folio. Split the VMA at mid-point with MADV_DONTFORK. fork() - parent points to the folio with 8 writable ptes and 8 non-writable ptes. Merge the VMAs with MADV_DOFORK so that folio_unmap_pte_batch() can determine all the 16 ptes as a batch. Do MADV_FREE on the range to mark the folio as lazyfree. Write to the memory to dirty the pte, eventually rmap will dirty the folio. Then trigger reclaim, we will hit the pte restoration path, and the kernel will crash with the trace given below. The BUG happens at: BUG_ON(atomic_inc_return(&ptc->anon_map_count) > 1 && rw); The code path is asking for anonymous page to be mapped writable into the pagetable. The BUG_ON() firing implies that such a writable page has been mapped into the pagetables of more than one process, which breaks anonymous memory/CoW semantics. [ 21.134473] kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:118! [ 21.134497] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP [ 21.135917] Modules linked in: [ 21.136085] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1735 Comm: dup-lazyfree Not tainted 7.0.0-rc1-00116-g018018a17770 #1028 PREEMPT [ 21.136858] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 21.137019] pstate: 21400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 21.137308] pc : page_table_check_set+0x28c/0x2a8 [ 21.137607] lr : page_table_check_set+0x134/0x2a8 [ 21.137885] sp : ffff80008a3b3340 [ 21.138124] x29: ffff80008a3b3340 x28: fffffdffc3d14400 x27: ffffd1a55e03d000 [ 21.138623] x26: 0040000000000040 x25: ffffd1a55f7dd000 x24: 0000000000000001 [ 21.139045] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000001 x21: ffffd1a55f217f30 [ 21.139629] x20: 0000000000134521 x19: 0000000000134519 x18: 005c43e000040000 [ 21.140027] x17: 0001400000000000 x16: 0001700000000000 x15: 000000000000ffff [ 21.140578] x14: 000000000000000c x13: 005c006000000000 x12: 0000000000000020 [ 21.140828] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 005c000000000000 x9 : ffffd1a55c079ee0 [ 21.141077] x8 : 0000000000000001 x7 : 005c03e000040000 x6 : 000000004000ffff [ 21.141490] x5 : ffff00017fffce00 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000002 [ 21.141741] x2 : 0000000000134510 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0000c08228c0 [ 21.141991] Call trace: [ 21.142093] page_table_check_set+0x28c/0x2a8 (P) [ 21.142265] __page_table_check_ptes_set+0x144/0x1e8 [ 21.142441] __set_ptes_anysz.constprop.0+0x160/0x1a8 [ 21.142766] contpte_set_ptes+0xe8/0x140 [ 21.142907] try_to_unmap_one+0x10c4/0x10d0 [ 21.143177] rmap_walk_anon+0x100/0x250 [ 21.143315] try_to_unmap+0xa0/0xc8 [ 21.143441] shrink_folio_list+0x59c/0x18a8 [ 21.143759] shrink_lruvec+0x664/0xbf0 [ 21.144043] shrink_node+0x218/0x878 [ 21.144285] __node_reclaim.constprop.0+0x98/0x338 [ 21.144763] user_proactive_reclaim+0x2a4/0x340 [ 21.145056] reclaim_store+0x3c/0x60 [ 21.145216] dev_attr_store+0x20/0x40 [ 21.145585] sysfs_kf_write+0x84/0xa8 [ 21.145835] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x130/0x1c8 [ 21.145994] vfs_write+0x2b8/0x368 [ 21.146119] ksys_write+0x70/0x110 [ 21.146240] __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x38 [ 21.146380] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 [ 21.146513] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf8 [ 21.146679] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40 [ 21.146798] el0_svc+0x34/0x110 [ 21.146926] el0t ---truncated---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/rmap: fix incorrect pte restoration for lazyfree folios We batch unmap anonymous lazyfree folios by folio_unmap_pte_batch. If the batch has a mix of writable and non-writable bits, we may end up setting the entire batch writable. Fix this by respecting writable bit during batching. Although on a successful unmap of a lazyfree folio, the soft-dirty bit is lost, preserve it on pte restoration by respecting the bit during batching, to make the fix consistent w.r.t both writable bit and soft-dirty bit. I was able to write the below reproducer and crash the kernel. Explanation of reproducer (set 64K mTHP to always): Fault in a 64K large folio. Split the VMA at mid-point with MADV_DONTFORK. fork() - parent points to the folio with 8 writable ptes and 8 non-writable ptes. Merge the VMAs with MADV_DOFORK so that folio_unmap_pte_batch() can determine all the 16 ptes as a batch. Do MADV_FREE on the range to mark the folio as lazyfree. Write to the memory to dirty the pte, eventually rmap will dirty the folio. Then trigger reclaim, we will hit the pte restoration path, and the kernel will crash with the trace given below. The BUG happens at: BUG_ON(atomic_inc_return(&ptc->anon_map_count) > 1 && rw); The code path is asking for anonymous page to be mapped writable into the pagetable. The BUG_ON() firing implies that such a writable page has been mapped into the pagetables of more than one process, which breaks anonymous memory/CoW semantics. [ 21.134473] kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:118! [ 21.134497] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP [ 21.135917] Modules linked in: [ 21.136085] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1735 Comm: dup-lazyfree Not tainted 7.0.0-rc1-00116-g018018a17770 #1028 PREEMPT [ 21.136858] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 21.137019] pstate: 21400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 21.137308] pc : page_table_check_set+0x28c/0x2a8 [ 21.137607] lr : page_table_check_set+0x134/0x2a8 [ 21.137885] sp : ffff80008a3b3340 [ 21.138124] x29: ffff80008a3b3340 x28: fffffdffc3d14400 x27: ffffd1a55e03d000 [ 21.138623] x26: 0040000000000040 x25: ffffd1a55f7dd000 x24: 0000000000000001 [ 21.139045] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000001 x21: ffffd1a55f217f30 [ 21.139629] x20: 0000000000134521 x19: 0000000000134519 x18: 005c43e000040000 [ 21.140027] x17: 0001400000000000 x16: 0001700000000000 x15: 000000000000ffff [ 21.140578] x14: 000000000000000c x13: 005c006000000000 x12: 0000000000000020 [ 21.140828] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 005c000000000000 x9 : ffffd1a55c079ee0 [ 21.141077] x8 : 0000000000000001 x7 : 005c03e000040000 x6 : 000000004000ffff [ 21.141490] x5 : ffff00017fffce00 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000002 [ 21.141741] x2 : 0000000000134510 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0000c08228c0 [ 21.141991] Call trace: [ 21.142093] page_table_check_set+0x28c/0x2a8 (P) [ 21.142265] __page_table_check_ptes_set+0x144/0x1e8 [ 21.142441] __set_ptes_anysz.constprop.0+0x160/0x1a8 [ 21.142766] contpte_set_ptes+0xe8/0x140 [ 21.142907] try_to_unmap_one+0x10c4/0x10d0 [ 21.143177] rmap_walk_anon+0x100/0x250 [ 21.143315] try_to_unmap+0xa0/0xc8 [ 21.143441] shrink_folio_list+0x59c/0x18a8 [ 21.143759] shrink_lruvec+0x664/0xbf0 [ 21.144043] shrink_node+0x218/0x878 [ 21.144285] __node_reclaim.constprop.0+0x98/0x338 [ 21.144763] user_proactive_reclaim+0x2a4/0x340 [ 21.145056] reclaim_store+0x3c/0x60 [ 21.145216] dev_attr_store+0x20/0x40 [ 21.145585] sysfs_kf_write+0x84/0xa8 [ 21.145835] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x130/0x1c8 [ 21.145994] vfs_write+0x2b8/0x368 [ 21.146119] ksys_write+0x70/0x110 [ 21.146240] __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x38 [ 21.146380] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 [ 21.146513] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf8 [ 21.146679] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40 [ 21.146798] el0_svc+0x34/0x110 [ 21.146926] el0t ---truncated---
The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/rmap: fix incorrect pte restoration for lazyfree folios We batch unmap anonymous lazyfree folios by folio_unmap_pte_batch. If the batch has a mix of writable and non-writable bits, we may end up setting the entire batch writable. Fix this by respecting writable bit during batching. Although on a successful unmap of a lazyfree folio, the soft-dirty bit is lost, preserve it on pte restoration by respecting the bit during batching, to make the fix consistent w.r.t both writable bit and soft-dirty bit. I was able to write the below reproducer and crash the kernel. Explanation of reproducer (set 64K mTHP to always): Fault in a 64K large folio. Split the VMA at mid-point with MADV_DONTFORK. fork() - parent points to the folio with 8 writable ptes and 8 non-writable ptes. Merge the VMAs with MADV_DOFORK so that folio_unmap_pte_batch() can determine all the 16 ptes as a batch. Do MADV_FREE on the range to mark the folio as lazyfree. Write to the memory to dirty the pte, eventually rmap will dirty the folio. Then trigger reclaim, we will hit the pte restoration path, and the kernel will crash with the trace given below. The BUG happens at: BUG_ON(atomic_inc_return(&ptc->anon_map_count) > 1 && rw); The code path is asking for anonymous page to be mapped writable into the pagetable. The BUG_ON() firing implies that such a writable page has been mapped into the pagetables of more than one process, which breaks anonymous memory/CoW semantics. [ 21.134473] kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:118! [ 21.134497] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP [ 21.135917] Modules linked in: [ 21.136085] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1735 Comm: dup-lazyfree Not tainted 7.0.0-rc1-00116-g018018a17770 #1028 PREEMPT [ 21.136858] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 21.137019] pstate: 21400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 21.137308] pc : page_table_check_set+0x28c/0x2a8 [ 21.137607] lr : page_table_check_set+0x134/0x2a8 [ 21.137885] sp : ffff80008a3b3340 [ 21.138124] x29: ffff80008a3b3340 x28: fffffdffc3d14400 x27: ffffd1a55e03d000 [ 21.138623] x26: 0040000000000040 x25: ffffd1a55f7dd000 x24: 0000000000000001 [ 21.139045] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000001 x21: ffffd1a55f217f30 [ 21.139629] x20: 0000000000134521 x19: 0000000000134519 x18: 005c43e000040000 [ 21.140027] x17: 0001400000000000 x16: 0001700000000000 x15: 000000000000ffff [ 21.140578] x14: 000000000000000c x13: 005c006000000000 x12: 0000000000000020 [ 21.140828] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 005c000000000000 x9 : ffffd1a55c079ee0 [ 21.141077] x8 : 0000000000000001 x7 : 005c03e000040000 x6 : 000000004000ffff [ 21.141490] x5 : ffff00017fffce00 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000002 [ 21.141741] x2 : 0000000000134510 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0000c08228c0 [ 21.141991] Call trace: [ 21.142093] page_table_check_set+0x28c/0x2a8 (P) [ 21.142265] __page_table_check_ptes_set+0x144/0x1e8 [ 21.142441] __set_ptes_anysz.constprop.0+0x160/0x1a8 [ 21.142766] contpte_set_ptes+0xe8/0x140 [ 21.142907] try_to_unmap_one+0x10c4/0x10d0 [ 21.143177] rmap_walk_anon+0x100/0x250 [ 21.143315] try_to_unmap+0xa0/0xc8 [ 21.143441] shrink_folio_list+0x59c/0x18a8 [ 21.143759] shrink_lruvec+0x664/0xbf0 [ 21.144043] shrink_node+0x218/0x878 [ 21.144285] __node_reclaim.constprop.0+0x98/0x338 [ 21.144763] user_proactive_reclaim+0x2a4/0x340 [ 21.145056] reclaim_store+0x3c/0x60 [ 21.145216] dev_attr_store+0x20/0x40 [ 21.145585] sysfs_kf_write+0x84/0xa8 [ 21.145835] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x130/0x1c8 [ 21.145994] vfs_write+0x2b8/0x368 [ 21.146119] ksys_write+0x70/0x110 [ 21.146240] __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x38 [ 21.146380] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 [ 21.146513] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf8 [ 21.146679] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40 [ 21.146798] el0_svc+0x34/0x110 [ 21.146926] el0t ---truncated---
The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-617: Reachable Assertion. The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 3 Apr 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC · CWE-617 · Reachable Assertion
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.