BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-24281High confidence

Apache ZooKeeper: Reverse-DNS fallback enables hostname verification bypass in ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager

Apache Software Foundation · Apache ZooKeeper

7.4HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.65% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Apache Software Foundation Apache ZooKeeper and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcezookeeperAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcezookeeperAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcezookeeperVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.9.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcezookeeperVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.9.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivezookeeperUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges4 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
Mavenorg.apache.zookeeper:zookeeperECOSYSTEM: introduced 3.8.0; fixed 3.8.63.8.6OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.apache.zookeeper:zookeeperECOSYSTEM: introduced 3.9.0; fixed 3.9.53.9.5OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
mavenorg.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper>= 3.8.0, < 3.8.63.8.6GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 10 Mar 2026
mavenorg.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper>= 3.9.0, < 3.9.53.9.5GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 10 Mar 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-24281 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product SecurityApache ZooKeeper: Apache ZooKeeper: Impersonation of servers or clients via reverse DNS spoofing
7 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • zookeeper as a component of Red Hat build of Debezium 2
  • zookeeper as a component of Red Hat build of Debezium 3
  • zookeeper as a component of Red Hat Fuse 7
  • zookeeper as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack
  • offline-knowledge-portal/rhokp-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Offline Knowledge Portal
  • rhoai/odh-modelmesh-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
  • zookeeper as a component of streams for Apache Kafka 3
Summary
A flaw was found in Apache ZooKeeper. The ZKTrustManager component's hostname verification process can fall back to reverse DNS (PTR) lookup when IP Subject Alternative Name (SAN) validation fails. This vulnerability allows an attacker who can control or spoof PTR records to impersonate ZooKeeper servers or clients, provided they possess a valid certificate for the PTR name. This could lead to unauthorized access or manipulation of ZooKeeper services.
Remediation
Before applying the update, back up your existing installation, including all applications, configuration files, databases and database settings. The References section of this erratum contains a download link (you must log in to download the update).
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-10139

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

Hostname verification in Apache ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager falls back to reverse DNS (PTR) when IP SAN validation fails, allowing attackers who control or spoof PTR records to impersonate ZooKeeper servers or clients with a valid certificate for the PTR name. It's important to note that attacker must present a certificate which is trusted by ZKTrustManager which makes the attack vector harder to exploit. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.6 or 3.9.5, which fixes this issue by introducing a new configuration option to disable reverse DNS lookup in client and quorum protocols.

What

Hostname verification in Apache ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager falls back to reverse DNS (PTR) when IP SAN validation fails, allowing attackers who control or spoof PTR records to impersonate ZooKeeper servers or clients with a valid certificate for the PTR name. It's important to note that attacker must present a certificate which is trusted by ZKTrustManager which makes the attack vector harder to exploit. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.6 or 3.9.5, which fixes this issue by introducing a new configuration option to disable reverse DNS lookup in client and quorum protocols.

Why

The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Hostname verification in Apache ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager falls back to reverse DNS (PTR) when IP SAN validation fails, allowing attackers who control or spoof PTR records to impersonate ZooKeeper servers or clients with a valid certificate for the PTR name. It's important to note that attacker must present a certificate which is trusted by ZKTrustManager which makes the attack vector harder to exploit. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.6 or 3.9.5, which fixes this issue by introducing a new configuration option to disable reverse DNS lookup in client and quorum protocols.

Why

The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-350 ↗

CWE-350: Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action. The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-350
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1032IBM Tivoli Network Manager: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Tivoli Network Manager ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260311Security Bulletin 11 Mar 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 11 Mar 2026, published on 11 March 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0933Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ERecord?id=CVE-2026-11897 Référence CVE CVE-2026-12143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-15057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15057 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22731 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22732 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22733 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24880 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25854 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27727 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27830 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27970 Référence CVE CVE-2026-29145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0641Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2026-21945 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22008 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23865 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679 Référence CVE CVE-2026-26007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-26996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27142 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27903 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27904 Référence CVE CVE-2026-29045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0556Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2026-22733 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22735 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22737 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22815 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2297 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23949 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24049 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24281 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24308 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24880 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25645 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25854 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0251Multiples vulnérabilités dans Apache Zookeeper

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Apache Zookeeper. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-006792Apache Software FoundationのApache ZooKeeperにおける複数の脆弱性

Apache ZooKeeper の ZKTrustManager におけるホスト名検証は、IP SAN 検証に失敗した場合にリバース DNS(PTR)にフォールバックします。これにより、PTR レコードを制御または偽装できる攻撃者が、PTR 名に対して有効な証明書を持つ ZooKeeper サーバーまたはクライアントをなりすますことが可能になります。ただし、攻撃者は ZKTrustManager によって信頼される証明書を提示する必要があり、この点が攻撃の困難さを増しています。ユーザーはクライアントおよびクオーラムプロトコルでのリバース DNS ルックアップを無効にする新しい設定オプションを導入し、この問題を修正したバージョン 3.8.6 または 3.9.5 へアップグレードすることを推奨します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 7 Mar 2026 · Last source change 15 Jul 2026, 01:17 UTC · CWE-350 · Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-10139
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    zookeeper as a component of Red Hat build of Debezium 2; zookeeper as a component of Red Hat build of Debezium 3; zookeeper as a component of Red Hat Fuse 7; zookeeper as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack; offline-knowledge-portal/rhokp-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Offline Knowledge Portal; rhoai/odh-modelmesh-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); zookeeper as a component of streams for Apache Kafka 3 · Fixed: Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.12.7; Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.5; Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.0; org.apache.zookeeper.zookeeper-3.8.4.redhat-00018.jar as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.0.7.GA; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-modelmesh-rhel9@sha256:ef9eae46fb64606e5d943c1dbc30eddbad35e50a2e67062f4c1a98bea48da038_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-modelmesh-rhel9@sha256:f3a60cbfd7a3674fcacb56f9a7cfe6e10c6d24a690d107cb5b258986e154f3d3_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25; Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4
    After
    zookeeper as a component of Red Hat build of Debezium 2; zookeeper as a component of Red Hat build of Debezium 3; zookeeper as a component of Red Hat Fuse 7; zookeeper as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack; offline-knowledge-portal/rhokp-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Offline Knowledge Portal; rhoai/odh-modelmesh-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); zookeeper as a component of streams for Apache Kafka 3 · Fixed: Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.12.7; org.apache.zookeeper.zookeeper-3.8.4.redhat-00018.jar as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.0.7.GA; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-modelmesh-rhel9@sha256:ef9eae46fb64606e5d943c1dbc30eddbad35e50a2e67062f4c1a98bea48da038_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-modelmesh-rhel9@sha256:f3a60cbfd7a3674fcacb56f9a7cfe6e10c6d24a690d107cb5b258986e154f3d3_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25; Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    3.9.0 ≤ 3.9.4; 3.8.0 ≤ 3.8.5 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    3.9.0 ≤ 3.9.4; 3.8.0 ≤ 3.8.5 · Fixed: Before applying the update, back up your existing installation, including all applications, configuration files, databases and database settings. The References section of this erratum contains a download link (you must log in to download the update).
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  3. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-24281 · cve.blacktree.nl