BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-23479High confidence

redis-server use-after-free in unblock client flow may allow remote code execution

redis · redis

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-93M2-935M-8RJ3 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.7HighCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 1.51% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs redis redis and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 3 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainvalkeyVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.0.4-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainvalkeyVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.8.1.7-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainvalkeyVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.7.2.13-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceredisVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5:8.0.2-3+deb13u3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcevalkeyAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceredisNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceredictAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceredisVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5:8.0.6-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcevalkeyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.1.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceredictAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceredisVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5:8.0.6-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcevalkeyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.1.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveredisUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-27396

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

Redis is an in-memory data structure store. In redis-server from 7.2.0 until 8.6.3, the unblock client flow does not handle an error return from `processCommandAndResetClient` when re-executing a blocked command. If a blocked client is evicted during this flow, an authenticated attacker can trigger a use-after-free that may lead to remote code execution. This has been patched in version 8.6.3.

What

Redis is an in-memory data structure store. In redis-server from 7.2.0 until 8.6.3, the unblock client flow does not handle an error return from `processCommandAndResetClient` when re-executing a blocked command. If a blocked client is evicted during this flow, an authenticated attacker can trigger a use-after-free that may lead to remote code execution. This has been patched in version 8.6.3.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

Redis is an in-memory data structure store. In redis-server from 7.2.0 until 8.6.3, the unblock client flow does not handle an error return from `processCommandAndResetClient` when re-executing a blocked command. If a blocked client is evicted during this flow, an authenticated attacker can trigger a use-after-free that may lead to remote code execution. This has been patched in version 8.6.3.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use After Free → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCHighVulnerable-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a major loss.VIHighVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a major loss.VAHighVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkRemote code executionCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1370Redis: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Ausführen von beliebigem Programmcode

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Redis ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0962Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Tenable

CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18667 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2003 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23631 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23918 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25588 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25589 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0905Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Security Center

CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2003 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23631 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23918 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24072 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25588 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25589 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33523 Référence CVE CVE-2026-33857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0901Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2026-21860 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22008 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22029 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23631 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23865 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0536Multiples vulnérabilités dans Redis

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Redis. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014417Redis Ltd.のRedisにおける解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Redisはインメモリデータ構造ストアです。redis-serverのバージョン7.2.0から8.6.3までにおいて、ブロックされたクライアントのフロー解除時に、ブロックされたコマンドを再実行する際に`processCommandAndResetClient`からのエラー返却が適切に処理されません。このフロー中にブロックされたクライアントがエビクトされると、認証済み攻撃者がuse-after-freeを引き起こし、リモートコード実行につながる可能性があります。この問題はバージョン8.6.3で修正されました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
redis: >= 7.2.0, < 8.6.3
Fixed
RHSA-2026:26540: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v. 10.0)
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 5 May 2026 · Last source change 16 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-27396
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-23479 · cve.blacktree.nl