BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-23414High confidence

tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait()

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait() The async_hold queue pins encrypted input skbs while the AEAD engine references their scatterlist data. Once tls_decrypt_async_wait() returns, every AEAD operation has completed and the engine no longer references those skbs, so they can be freed unconditionally. A subsequent patch adds batch async decryption to tls_sw_read_sock(), introducing a new call site that must drain pending AEAD operations and release held skbs. Move __skb_queue_purge(&ctx->async_hold) into tls_decrypt_async_wait() so the purge is centralized and every caller -- recvmsg's drain path, the -EBUSY fallback in tls_do_decryption(), and the new read_sock batch path -- releases held skbs on synchronization without each site managing the purge independently. This fixes a leak when tls_strp_msg_hold() fails part-way through, after having added some cloned skbs to the async_hold queue. tls_decrypt_sg() will then call tls_decrypt_async_wait() to process all pending decrypts, and drop back to synchronous mode, but tls_sw_recvmsg() only flushes the async_hold queue when one record has been processed in "fully-async" mode, which may not be the case here. [pabeni@redhat.com: added leak comment]
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait() The async_hold queue pins encrypted input skbs while the AEAD engine references their scatterlist data. Once tls_decrypt_async_wait() returns, every AEAD operation has completed and the engine no longer references those skbs, so they can be freed unconditionally. A subsequent patch adds batch async decryption to tls_sw_read_sock(), introducing a new call site that must drain pending AEAD operations and release held skbs. Move __skb_queue_purge(&ctx->async_hold) into tls_decrypt_async_wait() so the purge is centralized and every caller -- recvmsg's drain path, the -EBUSY fallback in tls_do_decryption(), and the new read_sock batch path -- releases held skbs on synchronization without each site managing the purge independently. This fixes a leak when tls_strp_msg_hold() fails part-way through, after having added some cloned skbs to the async_hold queue. tls_decrypt_sg() will then call tls_decrypt_async_wait() to process all pending decrypts, and drop back to synchronous mode, but tls_sw_recvmsg() only flushes the async_hold queue when one record has been processed in "fully-async" mode, which may not be the case here. [pabeni@redhat.com: added leak comment]
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-18195

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait() The async_hold queue pins encrypted input skbs while the AEAD engine references their scatterlist data. Once tls_decrypt_async_wait() returns, every AEAD operation has completed and the engine no longer references those skbs, so they can be freed unconditionally. A subsequent patch adds batch async decryption to tls_sw_read_sock(), introducing a new call site that must drain pending AEAD operations and release held skbs. Move __skb_queue_purge(&ctx->async_hold) into tls_decrypt_async_wait() so the purge is centralized and every caller -- recvmsg's drain path, the -EBUSY fallback in tls_do_decryption(), and the new read_sock batch path -- releases held skbs on synchronization without each site managing the purge independently. This fixes a leak when tls_strp_msg_hold() fails part-way through, after having added some cloned skbs to the async_hold queue. tls_decrypt_sg() will then call tls_decrypt_async_wait() to process all pending decrypts, and drop back to synchronous mode, but tls_sw_recvmsg() only flushes the async_hold queue when one record has been processed in "fully-async" mode, which may not be the case here. [pabeni@redhat.com: added leak comment]

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.5 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait() The async_hold queue pins encrypted input skbs while the AEAD engine references their scatterlist data. Once tls_decrypt_async_wait() returns, every AEAD operation has completed and the engine no longer references those skbs, so they can be freed unconditionally. A subsequent patch adds batch async decryption to tls_sw_read_sock(), introducing a new call site that must drain pending AEAD operations and release held skbs. Move __skb_queue_purge(&ctx->async_hold) into tls_decrypt_async_wait() so the purge is centralized and every caller -- recvmsg's drain path, the -EBUSY fallback in tls_do_decryption(), and the new read_sock batch path -- releases held skbs on synchronization without each site managing the purge independently. This fixes a leak when tls_strp_msg_hold() fails part-way through, after having added some cloned skbs to the async_hold queue. tls_decrypt_sg() will then call tls_decrypt_async_wait() to process all pending decrypts, and drop back to synchronous mode, but tls_sw_recvmsg() only flushes the async_hold queue when one record has been processed in "fully-async" mode, which may not be the case here. [pabeni@redhat.com: added leak comment]

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait() The async_hold queue pins encrypted input skbs while the AEAD engine references their scatterlist data. Once tls_decrypt_async_wait() returns, every AEAD operation has completed and the engine no longer references those skbs, so they can be freed unconditionally. A subsequent patch adds batch async decryption to tls_sw_read_sock(), introducing a new call site that must drain pending AEAD operations and release held skbs. Move __skb_queue_purge(&ctx->async_hold) into tls_decrypt_async_wait() so the purge is centralized and every caller -- recvmsg's drain path, the -EBUSY fallback in tls_do_decryption(), and the new read_sock batch path -- releases held skbs on synchronization without each site managing the purge independently. This fixes a leak when tls_strp_msg_hold() fails part-way through, after having added some cloned skbs to the async_hold queue. tls_decrypt_sg() will then call tls_decrypt_async_wait() to process all pending decrypts, and drop back to synchronous mode, but tls_sw_recvmsg() only flushes the async_hold queue when one record has been processed in "fully-async" mode, which may not be the case here. [pabeni@redhat.com: added leak comment]

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait() The async_hold queue pins encrypted input skbs while the AEAD engine references their scatterlist data. Once tls_decrypt_async_wait() returns, every AEAD operation has completed and the engine no longer references those skbs, so they can be freed unconditionally. A subsequent patch adds batch async decryption to tls_sw_read_sock(), introducing a new call site that must drain pending AEAD operations and release held skbs. Move __skb_queue_purge(&ctx->async_hold) into tls_decrypt_async_wait() so the purge is centralized and every caller -- recvmsg's drain path, the -EBUSY fallback in tls_do_decryption(), and the new read_sock batch path -- releases held skbs on synchronization without each site managing the purge independently. This fixes a leak when tls_strp_msg_hold() fails part-way through, after having added some cloned skbs to the async_hold queue. tls_decrypt_sg() will then call tls_decrypt_async_wait() to process all pending decrypts, and drop back to synchronous mode, but tls_sw_recvmsg() only flushes the async_hold queue when one record has been processed in "fully-async" mode, which may not be the case here. [pabeni@redhat.com: added leak comment]

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-18195Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait() The async_hold queue pins encrypted input skbs while the AEAD engine references their scatterlist data. Once tls_decrypt_async_wait() returns, every AEAD operation has completed and the engine no longer references those skbs, so they can be freed unconditionally. A subsequent patch adds batch async decryption to tls_sw_read_sock(), introducing a new call site that must drain pending AEAD operations and release held skbs. Move __skb_queue_purge(&ctx->async_hold) into tls_decrypt_async_wait() so the purge is centralized and every caller -- recvmsg's drain path, the -EBUSY fallback in tls_do_decryption(), and the new read_sock batch path -- releases held skbs on synchronization without each site managing the purge independently. This fixes a leak when tls_strp_msg_hold() fails part-way through, after having added some cloned skbs to the async_hold queue. tls_decrypt_sg() will then call tls_decrypt_async_wait() to process all pending decrypts, and drop back to synchronous mode, but tls_sw_recvmsg() only flushes the async_hold queue when one record has been processed in "fully-async" mode, which may not be the case here. [pabeni@redhat.com: added leak comment]

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0985Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um unter anderem einen Denial of Service-Angriff auszuführen oder um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

26-23087, CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23110, CVE-2026-23111, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23231, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23273, CVE-2026-23274, CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23351, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23422, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-27135, CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31431, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-23382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23388 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23434 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23417 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23422 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23426 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0546Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23379 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Gestion détaillée du document le 07 mai 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0519Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Linux

sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31519 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31520 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31521 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31522 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31523 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31524 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31525 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31528 du 23 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-41989 du 24 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23360 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23414 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31555 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31565 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31566 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31570 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31589 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31591 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31593 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31600 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31601 du 26 avril 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-31608 du 26 avril 2026 Bu

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0497Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23379 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31788 Référence CVE CVE-2026-5201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5201 Gestion détaillée du document le 24 avril 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-012684LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。tls_decrypt_async_wait()内のasync_holdのパージに関する問題です。async_holdキューは、AEADエンジンが散乱リストデータを参照している間、暗号化された入力skbを保持します。tls_decrypt_async_wait()が戻ると、すべてのAEAD操作が完了し、エンジンはもはやそれらのskbを参照しないため、無条件に解放できます。後続のパッチでtls_sw_read_sock()にバッチ非同期復号が追加され、新たに保留中のAEAD操作を排水し、保持されているskbを解放する必要がある呼び出し箇所が導入されました。__skb_queue_purge(&ctx-async_hold)をtls_decrypt_async_wait()に移動し、パージ処理を集中管理することで、すべての呼び出し元(recvmsgの排水パス、tls_do_decryption()の-EBUSYフォールバック、および新しいread_sockバッチパス)が同期時にそれぞれパージを管理することなく保持されたskbを解放できるようになりました。これにより、tls_strp_msg_hold()が一部の処理途中で失敗し、複製されたskbがasync_holdキューに追加された後に発生していたリークを修正しました。tls_decrypt_sg()はすべての保留中復号を処理するためにtls_decrypt_async_wait()を呼び出し、その後同期モードに戻りますが、tls_sw_recvmsg()は「完全非同期」モードで1つのレコードが処理されたときにのみasync_holdキューをフラッシュするため、ここではその動作が適用されていませんでした。[pabeni@redhat.com: リークに関するコメント追加]。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.18, 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.131 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.21 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.11 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Apr 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-18195
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    9f83fd0c179e0f458e824e417f9d5ad53443f685 < ac435be7c7613eb13a5a8ceb5182e10b50c9ce87; c61d4368197d65c4809d9271f3b85325a600586a < 2dcf324855c34e7f934ce978aa19b645a8f3ee71; 39dec4ea3daf77f684308576baf483b55ca7f160 < 6dc11e0bd0a5466bcc76d275c09e5537bd0597dd; b8a6ff84abbcbbc445463de58704686011edc8e1 < 9f557c7eae127b44d2e863917dc986a4b6cb1269; b8a6ff84abbcbbc445463de58704686011edc8e1 < fd8037e1f18ca5336934d0e0e7e1a4fe097e749d; b8a6ff84abbcbbc445463de58704686011edc8e1 < 84a8335d8300576f1b377ae24abca1d9f197807f; 4fc109d0ab196bd943b7451276690fb6bb48c2e0; 6.1.158 < 6.1.168 · Fixed: < 6.18; 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.131 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.21 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19.11 ≤ 6.19.*; 7.0 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 9f83fd0c179e0f458e824e417f9d5ad53443f685 < ac435be7c7613eb13a5a8ceb5182e10b50c9ce87, c61d4368197d65c4809d9271f3b85325a600586a < 2dcf324855c34e7f934ce978aa19b645a8f3ee71, 39dec4ea3daf77f684308576baf483b55ca7f160 < 6dc11e0bd0a5466bcc76d275c09e5537bd0597dd, b8a6ff84abbcbbc445463de58704686011edc8e1 < 9f557c7eae127b44d2e863917dc986a4b6cb1269, b8a6ff84abbcbbc445463de58704686011edc8e1 < fd8037e1f18ca5336934d0e0e7e1a4fe097e749d, b8a6ff84abbcbbc445463de58704686011edc8e1 < 84a8335d8300576f1b377ae24abca1d9f197807f, 4fc109d0ab196bd943b7451276690fb6bb48c2e0, 6.1.158 < 6.1.168, 6.6.114 < 6.6.131, 6.12.55 < 6.12.80, 6.17.5 < 6.18, 6.18 · Fixed: Linux: < 6.18, 6.1.168 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.131 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.21 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.11 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-23414 · cve.blacktree.nl