BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-23393High confidence

bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.10% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-15394

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion When a peer MEP is being deleted, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is called on ccm_rx_dwork before freeing. However, br_cfm_frame_rx() runs in softirq context under rcu_read_lock (without RTNL) and can re-schedule ccm_rx_dwork via ccm_rx_timer_start() between cancel_delayed_work_sync() returning and kfree_rcu() being called. The following is a simple race scenario: cpu0 cpu1 mep_delete_implementation() cancel_delayed_work_sync(ccm_rx_dwork); br_cfm_frame_rx() // peer_mep still in hlist if (peer_mep->ccm_defect) ccm_rx_timer_start() queue_delayed_work(ccm_rx_dwork) hlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep->head); kfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu); ccm_rx_work_expired() // on freed peer_mep To prevent this, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is replaced with disable_delayed_work_sync() in both peer MEP deletion paths, so that subsequent queue_delayed_work() calls from br_cfm_frame_rx() are silently rejected. The cc_peer_disable() helper retains cancel_delayed_work_sync() because it is also used for the CC enable/disable toggle path where the work must remain re-schedulable.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion When a peer MEP is being deleted, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is called on ccm_rx_dwork before freeing. However, br_cfm_frame_rx() runs in softirq context under rcu_read_lock (without RTNL) and can re-schedule ccm_rx_dwork via ccm_rx_timer_start() between cancel_delayed_work_sync() returning and kfree_rcu() being called. The following is a simple race scenario: cpu0 cpu1 mep_delete_implementation() cancel_delayed_work_sync(ccm_rx_dwork); br_cfm_frame_rx() // peer_mep still in hlist if (peer_mep->ccm_defect) ccm_rx_timer_start() queue_delayed_work(ccm_rx_dwork) hlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep->head); kfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu); ccm_rx_work_expired() // on freed peer_mep To prevent this, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is replaced with disable_delayed_work_sync() in both peer MEP deletion paths, so that subsequent queue_delayed_work() calls from br_cfm_frame_rx() are silently rejected. The cc_peer_disable() helper retains cancel_delayed_work_sync() because it is also used for the CC enable/disable toggle path where the work must remain re-schedulable.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion When a peer MEP is being deleted, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is called on ccm_rx_dwork before freeing. However, br_cfm_frame_rx() runs in softirq context under rcu_read_lock (without RTNL) and can re-schedule ccm_rx_dwork via ccm_rx_timer_start() between cancel_delayed_work_sync() returning and kfree_rcu() being called. The following is a simple race scenario: cpu0 cpu1 mep_delete_implementation() cancel_delayed_work_sync(ccm_rx_dwork); br_cfm_frame_rx() // peer_mep still in hlist if (peer_mep->ccm_defect) ccm_rx_timer_start() queue_delayed_work(ccm_rx_dwork) hlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep->head); kfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu); ccm_rx_work_expired() // on freed peer_mep To prevent this, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is replaced with disable_delayed_work_sync() in both peer MEP deletion paths, so that subsequent queue_delayed_work() calls from br_cfm_frame_rx() are silently rejected. The cc_peer_disable() helper retains cancel_delayed_work_sync() because it is also used for the CC enable/disable toggle path where the work must remain re-schedulable.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0861Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, weitere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und potentiell Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260401Security Bulletin 01 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 01 Apr 2026, published on 1 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23208 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23239 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23327 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23469 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31405 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31420 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31479 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31486 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

93-1 du 28 juillet 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20263393-1 Référence CVE CVE-2023-20585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39894 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23248 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31452 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0927Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-71274 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71286 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71297 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71302 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71305 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71314 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23248 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23276 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31429 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31430 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31438 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0900Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20263067-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:3075-1 du 16 juillet 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20263075-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:3083-1 du 16 juillet 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20263083-1 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23451 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31462 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31502 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31505 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31570 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23373 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23374 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23375 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23378 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23403 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23404 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-23381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23382 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23387 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23388 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23389 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23391 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23396 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0497Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23326 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23335 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23379 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23381 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23383 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23386 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23393 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23395 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23412 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23413 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23425 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-012705LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。bridge: cfm: peer_mep削除時の競合状態を修正しました。peer MEPが削除される際、解放前にcancel_delayed_work_sync()がccm_rx_dworkに対して呼び出されます。しかし、br_cfm_frame_rx()はsoftirqコンテキスト下でrcu_read_lock(RTNLなし)で動作し、cancel_delayed_work_sync()の戻りとkfree_rcu()の呼び出しの間にccm_rx_timer_start()を通じてccm_rx_dworkを再スケジュールすることがあります。単純な競合シナリオは以下の通りです。cpu0ではmep_delete_implementation()内でcancel_delayed_work_sync(ccm_rx_dwork)が呼ばれ、その間にcpu1のbr_cfm_frame_rx()がpeer_mepがまだhlistに存在する状態でpeer_mep-ccm_defectをチェックし、ccm_rx_timer_start()を呼び、queue_delayed_work(ccm_rx_dwork)を実行します。その後cpu0はhlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep-head)とkfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu)を実行し、cpu1のccm_rx_work_expired()は既に解放されたpeer_mepにアクセスしてしまいます。これを防ぐため、cancel_delayed_work_sync()はpeer MEP削除の両パスでdisable_delayed_work_sync()に置き換えられました。また、br_cfm_frame_rx()からの後続のqueue_delayed_work()呼び出しは黙って拒否されるようになりました。cc_peer_disable()ヘルパーは、CCの有効/無効切り替えパスで再スケジュール可能な作業が必要なため、引き続きcancel_delayed_work_sync()を保持しています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: dc32cbb3dbd7da38c700d6e0fc6354df24920525 < e89dbd2736a45f0507949af4748cbbf3ff793146, dc32cbb3dbd7da38c700d6e0fc6354df24920525 < d8f35767bacb3c7769d470a41cf161e3f3c07e70, dc32cbb3dbd7da38c700d6e0fc6354df24920525 < 1fd81151f65927fd9edb8ecd12ad45527dbbe5ab, dc32cbb3dbd7da38c700d6e0fc6354df24920525 < 3715a00855316066cdda69d43648336367422127, 5.11
Fixed
Linux: < 5.11, 6.12.78 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.20 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.10 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Mar 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-15394
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-23393 · cve.blacktree.nl