BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-23351High confidence

netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: split gc into unlink and reclaim phase

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.19.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: split gc into unlink and reclaim phase Yiming Qian reports Use-after-free in the pipapo set type: Under a large number of expired elements, commit-time GC can run for a very long time in a non-preemptible context, triggering soft lockup warnings and RCU stall reports (local denial of service). We must split GC in an unlink and a reclaim phase. We cannot queue elements for freeing until pointers have been swapped. Expired elements are still exposed to both the packet path and userspace dumpers via the live copy of the data structure. call_rcu() does not protect us: dump operations or element lookups starting after call_rcu has fired can still observe the free'd element, unless the commit phase has made enough progress to swap the clone and live pointers before any new reader has picked up the old version. This a similar approach as done recently for the rbtree backend in commit 35f83a75529a ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert").
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: split gc into unlink and reclaim phase Yiming Qian reports Use-after-free in the pipapo set type: Under a large number of expired elements, commit-time GC can run for a very long time in a non-preemptible context, triggering soft lockup warnings and RCU stall reports (local denial of service). We must split GC in an unlink and a reclaim phase. We cannot queue elements for freeing until pointers have been swapped. Expired elements are still exposed to both the packet path and userspace dumpers via the live copy of the data structure. call_rcu() does not protect us: dump operations or element lookups starting after call_rcu has fired can still observe the free'd element, unless the commit phase has made enough progress to swap the clone and live pointers before any new reader has picked up the old version. This a similar approach as done recently for the rbtree backend in commit 35f83a75529a ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert").
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-15323

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: split gc into unlink and reclaim phase Yiming Qian reports Use-after-free in the pipapo set type: Under a large number of expired elements, commit-time GC can run for a very long time in a non-preemptible context, triggering soft lockup warnings and RCU stall reports (local denial of service). We must split GC in an unlink and a reclaim phase. We cannot queue elements for freeing until pointers have been swapped. Expired elements are still exposed to both the packet path and userspace dumpers via the live copy of the data structure. call_rcu() does not protect us: dump operations or element lookups starting after call_rcu has fired can still observe the free'd element, unless the commit phase has made enough progress to swap the clone and live pointers before any new reader has picked up the old version. This a similar approach as done recently for the rbtree backend in commit 35f83a75529a ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert").

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: split gc into unlink and reclaim phase Yiming Qian reports Use-after-free in the pipapo set type: Under a large number of expired elements, commit-time GC can run for a very long time in a non-preemptible context, triggering soft lockup warnings and RCU stall reports (local denial of service). We must split GC in an unlink and a reclaim phase. We cannot queue elements for freeing until pointers have been swapped. Expired elements are still exposed to both the packet path and userspace dumpers via the live copy of the data structure. call_rcu() does not protect us: dump operations or element lookups starting after call_rcu has fired can still observe the free'd element, unless the commit phase has made enough progress to swap the clone and live pointers before any new reader has picked up the old version. This a similar approach as done recently for the rbtree backend in commit 35f83a75529a ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert").

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: split gc into unlink and reclaim phase Yiming Qian reports Use-after-free in the pipapo set type: Under a large number of expired elements, commit-time GC can run for a very long time in a non-preemptible context, triggering soft lockup warnings and RCU stall reports (local denial of service). We must split GC in an unlink and a reclaim phase. We cannot queue elements for freeing until pointers have been swapped. Expired elements are still exposed to both the packet path and userspace dumpers via the live copy of the data structure. call_rcu() does not protect us: dump operations or element lookups starting after call_rcu has fired can still observe the free'd element, unless the commit phase has made enough progress to swap the clone and live pointers before any new reader has picked up the old version. This a similar approach as done recently for the rbtree backend in commit 35f83a75529a ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert").

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: split gc into unlink and reclaim phase Yiming Qian reports Use-after-free in the pipapo set type: Under a large number of expired elements, commit-time GC can run for a very long time in a non-preemptible context, triggering soft lockup warnings and RCU stall reports (local denial of service). We must split GC in an unlink and a reclaim phase. We cannot queue elements for freeing until pointers have been swapped. Expired elements are still exposed to both the packet path and userspace dumpers via the live copy of the data structure. call_rcu() does not protect us: dump operations or element lookups starting after call_rcu has fired can still observe the free'd element, unless the commit phase has made enough progress to swap the clone and live pointers before any new reader has picked up the old version. This a similar approach as done recently for the rbtree backend in commit 35f83a75529a ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert").

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-15323Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: split gc into unlink and reclaim phase Yiming Qian reports Use-after-free in the pipapo set type: Under a large number of expired elements, commit-time GC can run for a very long time in a non-preemptible context, triggering soft lockup warnings and RCU stall reports (local denial of service). We must split GC in an unlink and a reclaim phase. We cannot queue elements for freeing until pointers have been swapped. Expired elements are still exposed to both the packet path and userspace dumpers via the live copy of the data structure. call_rcu() does not protect us: dump operations or element lookups starting after call_rcu has fired can still observe the free'd element, unless the commit phase has made enough progress to swap the clone and live pointers before any new reader has picked up the old version. This a similar approach as done recently for the rbtree backend in commit 35f83a75529a ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert").

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0861Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, weitere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen und potentiell Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260401Security Bulletin 01 Apr 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 01 Apr 2026, published on 1 April 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

26-23003, CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23060, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23110, CVE-2026-23111, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23231, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23273, CVE-2026-23274, CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23351, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23422, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-27135, CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23272 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23266 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23267 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23272 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23278 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23427 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23428 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23450 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31411 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0746Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23254 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0697Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23335 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23340 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23346 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23347 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23363 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-23298 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23300 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23303 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23307 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23312 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23368 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0695Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31676 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23254 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23454 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23256 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23257 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23258 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23260 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23261 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23262 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23264 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43077 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-23318 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23319 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23321 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23324 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23335 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23340 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23362 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23364 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23365 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-23325 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23330 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23334 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23335 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23336 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23340 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23343 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23347 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23352 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23354 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23356 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23357 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23359 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23360 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23361 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0376Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

ulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23315 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23317 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23318 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23319 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23324 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23334 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23336 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23340 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23343 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23347 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23351 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23352 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23356 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23357 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23359 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23364 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23365 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23367 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23368 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23370 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2026-23379 du 26 mars 2026 Bulletin de s

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-012962LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。netfilterのnft_set_pipapoに関して、ガベージコレクションをunlinkフェーズとreclaimフェーズに分割しました。Yiming QianがpipapoセットタイプにおけるUse-after-freeの脆弱性を報告しています。多数の期限切れ要素が存在する場合、コミット時のGCが非プリエンプティブルなコンテキストで非常に長時間実行され、ソフトロックアップ警告やRCUスタールレポート(ローカルサービス拒否)を引き起こす可能性があります。そのため、GCをunlinkフェーズとreclaimフェーズに分割する必要があります。ポインタがスワップされるまで、要素の解放をキューに入れることはできません。期限切れ要素は、データ構造のライブコピーを介してパケットパスおよびユーザースペースのダンプ操作の両方から依然としてアクセス可能です。call_rcu()は保護にならず、call_rcuが発火した後に開始されたダンプ操作や要素の検索は、コミットフェーズがクローンとライブポインタのスワップを行うまで、解放された要素を観察する可能性があります。これは、最近のrbtreeバックエンドのコミット35f83a75529a("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert")で採用されたアプローチと類似しています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.6, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.77 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.17 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.7 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 25 Mar 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-15323
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 65ca51b9fb85477ab92a04295aed34b38f7c062e; 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < c0f1f85097ac2b6e7d750fe4d05807985cd3fd3a; 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 16f3595c0441d87dfa005c47d8f95be213afaa9e; 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 7864c667aed01a58b87ca518a631322cd0ac34c0; 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < c12d570d71920903a1a0468b7d13b085203d0c93; 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 500a50a301ce962b019ab95053ac70264fec2c21; 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < aff13667708dfa0dce136b8efd81baa9fa6ef261; 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 9df95785d3d8302f7c066050117b04cd3c2048c2 · Fixed: < 5.6; 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.77 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.17 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19.7 ≤ 6.19.*
    After
    Linux: 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 65ca51b9fb85477ab92a04295aed34b38f7c062e, 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < c0f1f85097ac2b6e7d750fe4d05807985cd3fd3a, 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 16f3595c0441d87dfa005c47d8f95be213afaa9e, 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 7864c667aed01a58b87ca518a631322cd0ac34c0, 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < c12d570d71920903a1a0468b7d13b085203d0c93, 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 500a50a301ce962b019ab95053ac70264fec2c21, 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < aff13667708dfa0dce136b8efd81baa9fa6ef261, 3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da < 9df95785d3d8302f7c066050117b04cd3c2048c2, 5.6 · Fixed: Linux: < 5.6, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.77 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.17 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19.7 ≤ 6.19.*, 7.0 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-23351 · cve.blacktree.nl